Development of a complex intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care using the UK Medical Research Council framework

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 261-266

  Byrne, Molly ^a   Cupples, Margaret E ^b   Smith, Susan M ^c   Leathem, Claire ^b   Corrigan, Mairéad ^b   Byrne, Mary C ^a   Murphy, Andrew W ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPLEX INTERVENTION; EVALUATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LIFESTYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT INFORMATION; PILOT STUDY; PRESCRIPTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; REVIEW; SECONDARY PREVENTION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STAFF;

EID: 33646484973     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Medical Research Council. A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London, England: Medical Research Council; 2000.
2. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J. 2000;321:694-696.
3. Rowlands G, Sims J, Kerry S. A lesson learnt: the importance of modeling in randomized controlled trials for complex interventions in primary care. Fam Pract. 2005;22:132-139.
4. Pill R, Stott NCH, Rollnick SR, Rees ME. A randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve the care given in general practice to type II diabetic patients: patient outcomes and professional ability to change behavior. Fam Pract. 1998;15:229-235.
5. Wong I. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate complex healthcare interventions-a case study. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:247-252.
6. Power R, Langhaug LF, Nyamurera T, Wilson D, Bassett MT, Cowan FM. Developing complex interventions for rigorous evaluation-a case study from rural Zimbabwe. Health Educ Res. 2004;19:570-575.
7. Murphy AW, Cupples ME, Smith SM, Byrne M, Leathem C, Byrne MC. The SPHERE study. Secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: protocol of a randomised controlled trial of tailored practice and patient care plans with parallel qualitative, economic and policy analyses. [ISRCTN24081411]. Curr Controlled Trials Cardiovasc Med. July 29, 2005;6:11. Available at: http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/6/1/11. Accessed March 10, 2006.
8. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey-Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, Mass: Nimrod Press; 1993.
9. Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Thain J, Deans HG, Rawles JM, Squair JL. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care. Heart. 1998;80:447-452.
10. Cupples ME, McKnight A. Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk. Br Med J. 1994;309:993-996.
11. Murchie P, Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Simpson JA, Thain J. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Br Med J. 2003;326:84.
12. Moher M, Yudkin P, Wright L, et al. Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care. Br Med J. 2001;322:1338.
13. Jolly K, Bradley F, Sharp S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group. Br Med J. 1999;318:706-711.
14. Langham J, Tucker H, Sloan D, Pettifer J, Thom S, Hemingway H. Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a randomised controlled trial of training in information management, evidence-based medicine, both or neither: the PIER trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:818-824.
15. Bruce N, Burnett S. Prevention of lifestyle-related disease: general practitioners' views about their role, effectiveness and resources. Fam Pract. 1991;8:373-377.
16. Hunt P. Dietary counselling: theory into practice. J Inst Health Educ. 1995;33:4-8.
17. Ebrahim S, Smith GD. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple risk factor interventions for preventing coronary heart disease. Br Med J. 1997;314:1666-1674.
18. Wiles R. Patients' perceptions of their heart attack and recovery: the influence of epidemiological "evidence" and personal experience. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1477-1486.
19. Hulscher MEJL, Wensing M, van der Weiden T, Grol R. Interventions to Implement Prevention in Primary Care. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 2. Art No:CD00032. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000362.pub2. Available at: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cohrane/elsysrev/articles/ CD00362/frame.html. Accessed April 10, 2006.
20. Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423-1433.
21. Kelley K, Abraham C. RCT of a theory-based intervention promoting healthy eating and physical activity amongst out-patients older than 65 years. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:787-797.
22. McAlister FA, Lawson FME, Teo KK, Armstrong PW. Randomised trials of secondary prevention programmes in coronary heart disease: systematic review. Br Med J. 2001;323:957-962.
23. Feder G, Griffiths C, Eldridge S, Spence M. Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 1999;318:1522-1526.
24. Wright FL, Wiles RA, Moher M. Patients' and practice nurses' perceptions of secondary preventive care for established ischaemic heart disease: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:180-188.
25. Tod A, Read C, Lacey A, Abbott J. Barriers to uptake of services for coronary heart disease: qualitative study. Br Med J. 2001;323:1-6.
26. Wright L, Griffin S, Bradley F. Factors affecting practice nurse involvement in follow-up care of patients following myocardial infarction. Fam Pract. 1998;15:426-430.
27. Summerskill W, Pope C. "I saw panic rise in her eyes, and evidence-based medicine went out the door." An exploratory qualitative study of the barriers to secondary prevention in the management of coronary heart disease. Fam Pract. 2002;19:605-611.
28. Kanfer FHE, Goldstein APE. Helping People Change: a Textbook of Methods. New York, NY: Pergamon; 1986.
29. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
30. Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: theoretical approaches and a new model. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992:217-243.
31. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney B, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient Centred Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. London, England: Sage; 1995.
32. Byrne M, Walsh J, Murphy A. Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: patient beliefs and health-related behavior. J Psychosom Res. 2005;58:403-415.
33. Ononeze V. Qualitative Study of the Individual Experience of Heart Disease [dissertation]. Galway, Ireland: National University of Ireland; 2004.
34. Byrne M, Corrigan M, Cupples M, Smith S, Leathem C, Murphy A. The SPHERE study: using psychological theory to inform the development of behavior change training for primary care staff to increase secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Ir J Psychol. 2005;26:53-64.
35. Bradley F, Wiles R, Kinmonth AL, Mant D, Gantley M. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group. Br Med J. 1999;318:711-715.
36. Michie S, Abraham C. Interventions to change health behaviors: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychol Health. 2004;19:29-49.