Mercury uptake by Silene vulgaris grown on contaminated spiked soils

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 95, Issue SUPPL., 2012, Pages

  Pérez Sanz, Araceli ^a   Millán, Rocío ^b   Sierra, M José ^b   Alarcón, Remedios ^a   García, Pilar ^a   Gil Díaz, Mar ^a   Vazquez, Saúl ^c   Lobo, M Carmen ^a  

^a IMIDRA Finca El Encin   (Spain)

^b CIEMAT   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Mercury; Polluted soil; Silene vulgaris

Indexed keywords

MERCURY;

BIOACCUMULATION; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; DICOTYLEDON; MERCURY (ELEMENT); PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PHYTOMASS; SOIL POLLUTION; TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

ARTICLE; ASTERACEAE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; DRUG DETERMINATION; PLANT GROWTH; SILENE VULGARIS; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SOIL POLLUTION; VOLATILIZATION;

SILENE VULGARIS;

EID: 84856208766     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adriano D.C. Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment: Biogeochemistry, Bioavailability and Risk of Metals 2001, Springer, New York.
2. Atwood D.A., Zaman M.K. Mercury removal from water. Struct. Bond. 2006, 120:163-182. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/430_013.
3. Carpena R.O., Pérez-Sanz A., Vázquez S., Moreno E., Peñalosa J., Hernández L.E., Alarcón R., García P., Lobo M.C. Respuesta de Silene vulgaris en suelos contaminados con Arsénico y metales pesados. Capacidad fitorremediadora. Presente y futuro de la Nutrición Mineral de las Plantas 2008, 485-501. Grupo Nutrición Mineral de Plantas-SEFV, Granada. L.M. Romero y col (Ed.).
4. Chardonnens A.N., ten Bookum W.M., Kuijper L.D.J., Verkleij J.A.C., Ernst W.H.O. Distribution of cadmium in leaves of cadmium tolerant and sensitive ecotypes of Silene vulgaris. Physiol. Plant. 1998, 104(1):75-80.
5. Crowder A. Acidification, metals and macrophytes. Environ. Pollut. 1991, 71:171-203.
6. Day P.R. Particle fraction and particle-size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis 1965, Amer. Soc. Agr. Inc. Publ., Wisconsin. C.A. Black (Ed.).
7. Dowling D.N., Doty S.L. Improving phytoremediation through biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:204-209.
8. Jocelyn P.C. Biochemeistry of the -SH Group 1987, Academic Press, London, UK.
9. Kärelampi S., Schat H., Vangronsveld J., Verkleij J.A.C., van de Lelie D., Mergeay M., Tervahauta A.I. Genetic engineering in the improvement of plants for phytoremediation of metal polluted soils. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 107:225-231.
10. Lag J., Steinnes E. Regional distribution of mercury in humus layers of Norwegian forest soils. Acta Agric. Scand. 1978, 28:393-396.
11. Lindberg S.E., Jackson D.R., Huckabee J.W., Janzen S.A., Levin M.J., Lund J.R. Atmospheric emission and plant uptake of mercury from agricultural soil near Almadén mercury mine. J. Environ. Qual. 1979, 8:572-578.
12. Maggio A., Joly A. Effects of mercuric chloride on the hydraulic conductivity of tomato root systems'. Evidence for a channel-mediated water pathway. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109:331-335.
13. Martinez-Iñigo M.J., Pérez-Sanz A., Ortiz I., Alonso J., Alarcón R., García P., Lobo M.C. Bulk soil and rhizosphere bacterial community PCR-DGGE profiles and b-galactosidase activity as indicators of biological quality in soils contaminated by heavy metals and cultivated with Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke. Chemosphere 2009, 75:1376-1381.
14. McGrath S.P. Phytoextraction for soil remediation. Plants that Hyperaccumulate Heavy Metals 1998, 261-287. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. R.R. Brooks (Ed.).
15. McGrath S.P., Zhao F.J. Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14:277-282.
16. Millán R., Gamarra R., Schmid T., Sierra M.J., Quejido A.J., Sánchez D.M., Cardona A.I., Fernández M., Vera R. Mercury content in vegetation and soils of the Almadén mining area (Spain). Sci. Tot. Environ. 2006, 368(1):79-87.
17. Ministerio de Agricultura Métodos Oficiales de Análisis 1994, vol. III. Spain.
18. Molina J.A., Oyarzun R., Esbrí J.M., Higueras P. Mercury accumulation in soils and plants in the Almadén mining district, Spain: one of the most contaminated sites on Earth. Environ. Geochem. Health 2006, 28:487-498.
19. Moreno-Jimenez E., Peñalosa J.M., Esteban E., Carpena-Ruiz R. Mercury accumulation and resistance to mercury stress in Rumex induratus and Marrubium vulgare grown in perlite. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170:485-494.
20. Patra M., Sharma A. Mercury toxicity in plants. Bot. Rev. 2000, 66(3):379-422.
21. Pawloska T.E., Chaney R.L., Chin M., Charnat I. Effects of metal phytoextraction practices on the indigenous community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at a metal-contaminated landfill. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2000, 66:2526-2530.
22. Pérez-Sanz A., Alonso J., Alarcón R., García-Gonzalo P., Lobo M.C. Preliminary test to evaluate metal accumulation in Silene vulgaris grown in polluted soils treated previously with electrokinetic technologies. Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements: Environmental Protection, Remediation and Human Health 2007, 219-220. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing. Y. Zhu, N. Lepp, R. Naidu (Eds.).
23. Prasad M.N.V. Biomarkers. Heavy Metal Stress in Plants. From Molecules to Ecosystem 2003, 445-448. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. second ed. M.N.V. Prasad, J. Hagemeyer (Eds.).
24. Quinton J.N., Catt J.A., Hess T.M. The selective removal of phosphorus from soil: is event size important?. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30:538-545.
25. Rinklebe J., Duringa A., Overeschb M., Du Laingd G., Wennriche R., Stärke H.J., Mothese S. Dynamics of mercury fluxes and their controlling factors in large Hg-polluted floodplain areas. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:308-318.
26. Rogers R.D., Mc Farlane J.C. Factors influencing the volatilization of mercury from soil. J. Environ. Qual. 1979, 8:255-260.
27. Schat H., Voojijs R. Multiple tolerance and co-tolerance to heavy metals in Silene vulgaris: a co-segregation analysis. New Phytol. 1997, 136:489-496.
28. Schlüter K. Review: evaporation of mercury from soils. An intergration and synthesis of current knowledge. Environ. Geol. 2000, 39:249-271.
29. Sierra M.J., Millán R., Esteban E. Mercury uptake and distribution in Lavandula stoechas plants grown in soil from Almadén mining district (Spain). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47(11):2761-2767.
30. Smagin A.V., Azovtseva N.A., Smagina M.V., Stepanov A.L., Myagkova A.D., Kurbatova A.S. Criteria and methods to assess the ecological status of soils in relation to the landscaping of urban territories. Eur. Soil Sci. 2006, 39(5):539-551.
31. Sneller F.E.C., Van Heerwaarden L.M., Kraaijeveld-Smit F.J.L., Ten Bookum W.M., Koevoets L.M., Schat H., Verkleij J.A.C. Toxicity of arsenate in Silene vulgaris, accumulation and degradation of arsenate-induced phytochelatins. New Phytol. 1999, 144:223-232.
32. Van Heeswijk M.P.E., van Os C.H. Osmotic water permeabilities of brush border and basolateral membrane vesicles from rat renal cortex and small intestine. J. Membr. Biol. 1986, 92:183-193.
33. Vazquez S., Goldsbroughb P., Carpena R. Assessing the relative contributions of phytochelatins and the cell wall to cadmium resistance in white lupin. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 128:487-495.
34. Verkleij J.A.C., Koevoets P.L.M., Blake-Kalff M.M.A., Chardonnens A.N. Evidence for an important role of the tonoplast in the mechanism of naturally selected Zn tolerance in Silene vulgaris. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 153:188-191.
35. Wierzbicka M., Panufnik D. The adaptation of Silene vulgaris to growth on a calamine waste heap (S. Poland). Environ. Pollut. 1998, 101:415-426.
36. Ye R., Verkman A.S. Simultaneous optical measurement of osmotic and diffusional water permeability in cells and liposomes. Biochemistry 1989, 28:824-829.