An appraisal of the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-17

  Polaschek, Devon L L ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COPING BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; ETHICS; EVALUATION; EXPLANATORY VARIABLE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; HUMAN NEEDS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MOOD; OFFENDER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISON; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS MODEL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOPATHY; PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK NEED RESPONSIVITY MODEL; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIAL LEARNING; VALIDITY;

EID: 84856202746     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: 20448333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Andrews, D. A., (1980). Some experimental investigations of the principles of differential association through deliberate manipulations of the structure of service systems. American Sociological Review, 45, 448-462.
2. Andrews, D. A., (1982a). A personal, interpersonal and community-reinfircement perspective on deviant behaviour (PIC-R). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
3. Andrews, D. A., (1982b). The supervision of offenders: Identifying and gaining control over the factors which make a difference. (Report no. 1984-65). Research Division of the Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada, unpublished report.
4. Andrews, D. A., (2001). Principles of effective correctional programs. In, L. L. Motiuk, &, R. C. Serin, (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on effective correctional treatment (pp. 9-17). Ottawa, Ontario: Research Branch: Correctional Service of Canada.
5. Andrews, D. A., (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-need-responsivity: Making quality matter of policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 595-602. doi
6. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (1995). The Level of Service Inventory - Revised (LSI-R). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
8. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
9. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
10. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: Matthew Bender.
11. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (2010a). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th ed.). Newark, NJ: Matthew Bender.
12. Andrews, D. A., &, Bonta, J., (2010b). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-55. doi
13. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., &, Hoge, R. D., (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
14. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., &, Wormith, J. S., (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
15. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., &, Wormith, J. S., (2011). The Risk-Need Responsivity model: Does the Good Lives Model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735-755. doi
16. Andrews, D. A., &, Kiessling, J. J., (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVIC research. In, R. R. Ross, &, P. Gendreau, (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 439-463). Toronto, Ontario: Butterworth.
17. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., &, Cullen, F. T., (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
18. Beyko, M. J., &, Wong, S. C. P., (2005). Predictors of treatment attrition as indicators for program improvement not offender shortcomings: A study of sex offender treatment attrition. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 375-389. doi (Pubitemid 41772324)
19. Blanchette, K., &, Brown, S. L., (2006). The assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20. Bonta, J., &, Andrews, D. A., (2003). A commentary on Ward and Stewart's model of human needs. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 215-218. doi (Pubitemid 36931531)
21. Bonta, J., &, Andrews, D. A., (2007). Risk-Need-Responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. (Report no. 2007-06). Ottawa, Canada: Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. Retrieved from
22. Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., &, Li, J., (2010). The strategic training initiative in community supervision: Risk-need-responsivity in the real world. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from
23. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G., &, Yessine, A., (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248-270. doi
24. Bourgon, G., Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., &, Yessine, A. K., (2009). Translating "what works" into sustainable everyday practice: Program design, implementation and evaluation. (Report no. 2009-05). Ottawa: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from
25. Bowen, E., (2011). The rehabilitation of partner-violent men. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26. Coebergh, B., Bakker, L., Anstiss, B., Maynard, K., &, Percy, S., (1999). A seein'"I" to the future: The Criminogenic Needs Inventory (CNI). Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Corrections Psychological Service unpublished report.
27. Colbert, S., (Producer). (2005. October 17). The Colbert Report [Television series episode]. New York: Comedy Central. Retrieved from
28. Cortoni, F., Nunes, &, Latendresse,. (2006). An examination of the effectiveness of the Violence Prevention Program (R-178). Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada unpublished report. Retrieved from.
29. Cullen, F. T., (in press). Taking rehabilitation seriously: Creativity, science, and the challenge of offender change. Punishment and Society.
30. Day, A., Casey, S., Ward, T., Howells, K., &, Vess, J., (2010). Transitions to better lives: Offender readiness and rehabilitation. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
31. Dowden, C., &, Andrews, D. A., (2003). Does family intervention work for delinquents? Results of a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45, 327-342. (Pubitemid 37374360)
32. Dowden, C., &, Andrews, D. A., (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 203-214. doi (Pubitemid 38352318)
33. Gendreau, P., &, Andrews, D. A., (2001). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory-2000 (CPAI-2000). Saint John, New Brunswick: University of New Brunswick.
34. Gendreau, P., Smith, P., &, French, S., (2006). The theory of effective correctional intervention: Empirical status and future directions. In, F. Cullen, J. Wright, &, M. Coleman, (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminology theory (pp. 419-446). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
35. Goggin, C., &, Gendreau, P., (2006). The implementation and maintenance of quality services in offender rehabilitation programmes. In, C. R. Hollin, &, E. J. Palmer, (Eds.), Offending behaviour programmes: Development, application, and controversies (pp. 209-246). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Gordon, A., &, Wong, S. C. P., (2010). Offence analogue behaviours as indicators of criminogenic need and treatment progress in custodial settings. In, M. Daffern, L. Jones, &, J. Shine, (Eds.), Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention (pp. 171-183). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
37. Hanson, R. K., (2005). Accreditation standards for correctional programs. Research summary 10 (1). Retrieved from
38. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., &, Hodgson, S., (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-892. doi
39. Hubbard, D. J., &, Pealer, J., (2009). The importance of responsivity factors in predicting reductions in antisocial attitudes and cognitive distortions among adult male offenders. The Prison Journal, 89, 79-98. doi
40. Kemshall, H., (2010). The role of risk, needs and strengths assessment in improving the supervision of offenders. In, F. McNeill, P. Raynor, &, C. Trotter, (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 155-171). Abingdon, UK: Willan.
41. Kirsch, L. G., &, Becker, J. V., (2006). Sexual offending: Theory of problem, theory of change, and implications for treatment effectiveness. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 208-224. doi
42. Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T., &, Gendreau, P., (2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66, 43-49.
43. Latessa, E. J., Lemke, R., Makarios, M., Smith, P., &, Lowenkamp, C. T., (2010). The creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS). Federal Probation, 74, 16-22.
44. Lipton, D. S., Thornton, D., McGuire, J., Porporino, F. J., &, Hollin, C. R., (2000). Program accreditation and correctional treatment. Substance Use and Misuse, 35, 1705-1734. (Pubitemid 32004725)
45. Listwan, S. J., Cullen, F. T., &, Latessa, E. J., (2006). How to prevent prisoner re-entry programs from failing: Insights from evidence-based corrections. Federal Probation, 70, 19-25.
46. Lösel, F., (2010). What works in reducing reoffending: A global perspective. Paper presented at the 12th Annual conference of the International Corrections and Prisons Association, Gent, Belgium.
47. Lowenkamp, C. T., Flores, A. W., Holsinger, A. M., Makarios, M. D., &, Latessa, E. J., (2010). Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 368-375. doi
48. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., &, Smith, P., (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575-594. doi
49. Maguire, M., Grubin, D., Lösel, F., &, Raynor, P., (2010). "What works" and the Correctional Services Accreditation Panel: Taking stock from an insider perspective. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10, 37-58. doi
50. Mann, R. E., (2009). Sex offender treatment: The case for manualization. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 121-131. doi
51. Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., &, Thornton, D., (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 22, 191-217. doi
52. Marshall, W. L., (2009). Manualization: A blessing or a curse? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 109-120. doi
53. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Serran, G. A., &, O'Brien, M. D., (2011). Rehabilitating sexual offenders: A strength-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi
54. McMurran, M., (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 83-100. doi
55. Miltenberger, R. G., (2004). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomason Learning.
56. Ogloff, J. R. P., &, Davis, M. R., (2004). Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk-needs-responsivity approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 229-242. doi (Pubitemid 38846334)
57. Paparozzi, M. A., &, Gendreau, P., (2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85, 445-466. doi (Pubitemid 41765968)
58. Pearson, D. A. S., McDougall, C., Kanaan, M., Bowles, R. A., &, Torgerson, D. J., (2006). Reducting criminal recidivism: Evaluation of citizenship: An evidence-based probation supervision process. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 73-102. doi
59. Polaschek, D. L. L., (2011). Many sizes fit all: A preliminary framework for conceptualizing the development and provision of cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation programs for offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 20-35. doi
60. Polaschek, D. L. L., &, Dixon, B. G., (2001). The violence prevention project: The development and evaluation of a treatment programme for violent offenders. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 7, 1-23. (Pubitemid 33707945)
61. Porporino, F. J., (2010). Bringing sense and sensitivity to corrections: From programmes to fix offenders to services support desistance. In, J. Brayford, F. Cowe, &, J. Deering, (Eds.), What else works? Creative work with offenders (pp. 61-85). Uffculme, Devon, UK: Willan.
62. Song, H., &, Schwarz, N., (2008). If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986-988. doi
63. Song, H., &, Schwarz, N., (2009). If it's difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135-138. doi
64. Sternberg, R. J., (2006). Reviewing theory articles. In, R. J. Sternberg, (Ed.), Reviewing scientific works in psychology (pp. 43-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65. Taxman, F., (2006). Assessment with a flair: Offender accountability in supervision plans. Federal Probation, 70, 2-7.
66. Ward, T., &, Hudson, S. M., (1998). The construction and development of theory in the sexual offending area: A metatheoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 47-63.
67. Ward, T., &, Maruna, S., (2007). Rehabilitation. London: Routledge.
68. Ward, T., Melser, J., &, Yates, P. M., (2007). Reconstructing the risk, need, responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208-228. doi
69. Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. L., &, Beech, A. R., (2006). Theories of sexual offending. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
70. Ward, T., Yates, P. M., &, Willis, G. M., (in press). The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2011). Criminal Justice and Behavior.
71. Ware, J., &, Coebergh,. (2004). CNI severity project: A methodology for assessing offender relapse prevention knowledge /skills and offender motivation. Christchurch, NZ: Department of Corrections Psychological Service, unpublished report.
72. Wong, S., Gordon, A., &, Gu, D., (2007). Assessment and treatment of violence-prone forensic clients: An integrated approach. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190 (suppl. 49), S66-S74. doi (Pubitemid 46706945)
73. Wormith, J. S., (2011). The legacy of D. A. Andrews in the field of criminal justice: How theory and research can change policy and practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 78-82. doi
74. Wormith, J. S., Gendreau, P., &, Bonta, J., (in press). Deferring to clarity, parsimony, and evidence in reply to Ward, Yates, and Willis (2011). Criminal Justice and Behavior.
75. Yates, P. M., Prescott, D., &, Ward, T., (2010). Applying the Good Lives and Self-regulation models to sex offender treatment: A practical guide for clinicians. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.