Comparison of MEA and DGA performance for CO 2 capture under different operational conditions

International Journal of Energy Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 259-268

  Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh ^a   Mofarahi, Masoud ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM INDUSTRY RIPI   (Iran)

^b PERSIAN GULF UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Avoided CO 2; CO 2 capture; DGA; MEA; Parametric design

Indexed keywords

AVOIDED CO 2; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; DGA; DIGLYCOLAMINE; ENERGY USAGE; GAS SWEETENING PLANTS; HIGH ACTIVITY; HIGH ENERGY REQUIREMENTS; LOW CONCENTRATIONS; MEA; MINIMUM ENERGY; MONOETHANOLAMINE; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; PARAMETRIC DESIGN; PRIMARY AMINES; TECHNICAL EVALUATION;

ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION; FLUE GASES; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS PLANTS; GREENHOUSE GASES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SOLVENTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84856194426     PISSN: 0363907X     EISSN: 1099114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/er.1812     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gibbins J, Chalmers H. Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 2008; 36:4317-4322.
2. 2 Capture and Storage, Paris, France, 2004.
3. Metz B, Davidson O, Coninck HD, Loos M, Meyer L. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2005.
4. 2. Energy 2007; 32:1163-1176.
5. 2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 2007; 27:2693-2702.
6. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environmental Science and Technology 2002; 36:4467-4475.
7. 2 from flue gases of gas turbine. Energy 2008; 33:1311-1319.
8. 2 Capture Technologies and Opportunities in Canada. CANMET Energy Technology Centre: Canada, 2003.
9. th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Kyoto, Japan, 1-4 October 2002.
10. 2 capture from power plants Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007; 1:37-46.
11. 2 capture from power plants Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007; 1:135-142.
12. 2 Capture Demonstration Plant. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2006; 45:2414-2420.
13. 2 capture costs. Applied Thermal Engineering 2008; 28:1039-1046.
14. 2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Conversion and Management 2005; 46:475-487.
15. 3 absorption in the IGCC system. International Journal of Energy Research 2004; 28:521-535.
16. Hammondz G, Serge S, Akwe O. Thermodynamic and related analysis of natural gas combined cycle power plants with and without carbon sequestration. International Journal of Energy Research 2007; 31:1180-1201.
17. Whitaker S, Cassano AE. Concepts and Design of Chemical Reactors. Gordon and Breach: New York, 1986.
18. 2 by chemical absorption. Energy Procedia 2009; 1:1373-1380.
19. Kohl A, Nielsen R. Gas Purification (5th edn). Gulf Publishing Company: Houston, 1997.
20. Polasek J, Bullin J. Selecting Amines for Sweetening Units. Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc.: Bryan, Texas, 1994.
21. 2 capture processes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2006; 45:2513-2521.
22. Tobiesen FA, Svendsen H. Study of a modified amine-based regeneration unit. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2006; 45:2489-2496.
23. 2 in aqueous diglycolamine. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2006; 45:2473-2482.
24. Vadquez-Esparragoza JJ, Polasek JC, Hernandez-Valencia VN, Hlavinka MW, Bullin JA. A Simple Application of Murphree Tray Efficiency to Separation Processes. Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc.: Bryan, TX, 2006.
25. 2 Separation using MEA-DOW process. SRI PEP Report 180A, Menlo Park, California, 2004.