From identity verification to behavior prediction: Ethical implications of second generation biometrics

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 21-36

  Sutrop, Margit ^a   Laas Mikko, Katrin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^b Certification Centre   (Estonia)

Author keywords

ADABTS; Behavior prediction; Discrimination; Ethical issues; FAST; First generation biometrics; Informed consent; Moral autonomy; Privacy; Second generation biometrics; Stigmatization; Surveillance; Trust

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BIOMETRY; DATA; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; SURVEILLANCE AND ENFORCEMENT;

EID: 84856188684     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00536.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ACTIBIO. (n.d.). Unobtrusive authentication using activity related and soft biometrics (ACTIBIO), ACTIBIO ethical manual. Retrieved from
2. ADABTS. (2010). Automatic detection of abnormal behavior and threats in crowded spaces (ADABTS), "ADABTS WP3 abnormal behaviour. D.3." Retrieved from
3. ADABTS. (2011). Automatic detection of abnormal behavior and threats in crowded spaces (ADABTS), "ADABTS WP2 user needs. D.2.1." Retrieved from
4. Alterman, A. (2003). "A piece of yourself": Ethical issues in biometric identification. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 139-150.
5. Beck, U. (2000). Risk society revisited: Theory, politics and research programmes. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond (pp. 211-229). London: Sage.
6. Cherry, S., & Corley, A.-M. (2010). Loser: Bad vibes. IEEE Spectrum, January. Retrieved from
7. Dandekar, N. (1993). Privacy. Philosophical Forum, 24(4), 331-348.
8. Dass, S. C., & Jain, A. K. (2007). Fingerprint-based recognition. Technometrics, 49(3), 262-276.
9. European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA). (2010). ENISA Briefing: Behavioural Biometrics. Retrieved from
10. European Parliament. (1995). Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal, L281, 31-50.
11. Future of Identity in the Information Society (FIDIS). (2009). D3.10: Biometrics in identity management. Retrieved from
12. Garland, D. (2003). The rise of risk. In A. Doyle & V. R. Ericson (Eds.), Risk and morality (pp. 48-86). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
13. Gray, M. (2003). Urban surveillance and panopticism: Will we recognize the facial recognition society? Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 314-330.
14. Heck, W. (2009). EU to monitor deviant behavior in fight against terrorism. Spiegel Online, October 21. Retrieved from
15. Jain, A., Bolle, R., & Pankanti, S. (1996). Biometrics, personal identification in networked society. New York: Springer.
16. Lodge, J. (2010). Quantum surveillance and "shared secrets". A biometric step too far? Justice and home affairs. CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe, 1-39. Retrieved from
17. Lyon, D. (2001). Facing the future: Seeking ethics for everyday surveillance. Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 171-181.
18. Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and automated discrimination (pp. 13-31). London: Routledge.
19. Manders-Huits, N., & van der Hoven, J. (2008). Moral identification in identity management systems. In IFIP international federation for information processing. The Future of Identity in the Information Society, 262, 77-91.
20. Manson, N. C., & O'Neill, O. (2007). Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. McCahill, M. (1998). Beyond Foucault: Towards a contemporary theory of surveillance. In C. J. M. Norris (Ed.), Surveillance, closed circuit television and control (pp. 41-65). Aldershot: Ashgate.
22. McCarthy, P. (2012). Biometric technologies. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of applied ethics, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
23. Messmer, E. (2010). Can behavioral biometrics help detect terrorists entering the U.S? Network World, September 22. Retrieved from
24. Moore, M. H. (2002). The polygraph and lie detection. Commitee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph (National Research Council (United States)). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
25. Moore, A. (2008). Defining privacy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3), 411-428.
26. Mordini, E., & Massari, S. (2008). Body, biometrics and identity. Bioethics, 22(9), 488-498.
27. Nelson, L. (2006). Normative dimensions of paternalism and security. I/S-A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 2(1), 27-51.
28. Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Protecting privacy in information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17, 559-596.
29. Royal Society. (1992). Risk: Analysis, perception, management. London: Royal Society.
30. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2008). Privacy impact assessment for the future attribute screening technology (FAST) project. Retrieved from
31. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011). FAST (future attribute screening technology) project description. Retrieved from
32. van der Ploeg, I. (2010). Identity, biometrics and behavior predictability. RISE European multi-stakeholder conference on "ethics and governance of biometrics and identification technologies, "9-10 December, Brussels.Retrieved from
33. Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Williams, B. (1981). Moral luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Wright, A. (2009). Machine that predicts terrorists' intent showing progress. National Defence, Retrieved from