Test-retest reliability of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: A systematic review of the literature involving adults

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3205-3207

  Bohanno, Richard W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Measurement; Muscle strength; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY POSTURE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICS;

ADULT; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; POSTURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84856156473     PISSN: 10648011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e59f     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Bland, JMand Kerry, SM. Weighted comparison of means. BMJ 316: 129, 1998.
2. Bohannon, RW. Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: A descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders. Percept Motor Skills 103: 215-222, 2006. (Pubitemid 44757093)
3. Bohannon, RW, Bubela, DJ, Magasi, SR, and Gershon, RC. Relative reliability of three objective tests of lower limb strength. Isokinet Exerc Sci 19: 77-81, 2011.
4. Bohannon, RW, Bubela,DJ,Magasi, SR,Wang, Y-C, andGershon, RC. Sit-to-stand test: Performance and determinants across the age-span. Isokinet Exerc Sci 18: 235-240, 2010.
5. Cincura, C, Pontes-Neto, OM, Neville, IS, Mendes, HF, Menezes, DF, and Mariano, DC. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: The role of cultural adaption and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis 27: 119-122, 2009.
6. Hortobágyi, T, Mizelle, C, Beam, S, and DeVita, P. Old adults perform activities of daily living near their maximal capabilities. J Gerontol: Med Sci 58A: 453-460, 2003. (Pubitemid 36535117)
7. Lin, Y-C, Davey, RC, and Cochrane, T. Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11: 280-286, 2001. (Pubitemid 33645153)
8. Lord, SR, Murray, SM, Chapman, K, Munro, B, and Tiedemann, A. Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. J Gerontol 57A: M539-M543, 2002. (Pubitemid 35006100)
9. Meretta, BM, Whitney, SL, Marchetti, GF, Sparto, PJ, and Muirhead, RJ. The five times sit to stand test: Responsiveness to change and concurrent validity in adults undergoing vestibular rehabilitation. J Vest Res 16: 233-243, 2006. (Pubitemid 46866280)
10. Ostchega, Y, Harris, TB, Hirsch, R, Parsons, VL, Kington, R, and Katzoff, M. Reliability and prevalence of physical performance examination assessing mobility and balance in persons in the US: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 1136-1141, 2000.
11. Ostir, GV, Volpato, S, Fried, LP, Chaves, P, and Guralnik, JM. Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function. Results from theWomen's Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol 55: 916-921, 2002. (Pubitemid 35246563)
12. Ploutz-Snyder, LL, Manini, T, Ploutz-Snyder, RJ, and Wolf, DA. Functionally relevant thresholds of quadriceps femoris strength. J Gerontol 57A: B144-B152, 2002. (Pubitemid 34263291)
13. Rankin, G and Stokes, M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 12: 187-199, 1998. (Pubitemid 28339917)
14. Schaubert, K and Bohannon, RW. Reliability of the sit-to-stand test over dispersed test sessions. Isokinet Exerc Sci 13: 119-122, 2005. (Pubitemid 40875140)
15. Simmonds, MJ, Olson, SL, Jones, S, Hussein, T, Lee, EC, Novy, D, and Radwan, H. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 23: 2412-2421, 1998. (Pubitemid 28536062)
16. Smeets, RJEM, Hijdra, HJM, Kester, ADM, Hitters, MWGC, and Knottnerus, JA. The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil 20: 989-998, 2006. (Pubitemid 46940895)
17. Stratford, PW. Confidence intervals for your ICC. Phys Ther 69: 237-238, 1989.
18. Tager, IB, Swanson, A, Satariano, WA. Reliability of physical performance and self-reported functional measures in an older population. J Gerontol: Med Sci 53A: M295-M300, 1998. (Pubitemid 28354747)
19. Tiedmann, A, Lord, SR, and Sherrington, C. The development and validation of a brief performance-based fall risk assessment tool for use in primary care. J Gerontol: Med Sci 65: 896-903, 2010.
20. Weir, JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19: 231-240, 2005. (Pubitemid 40417282)
21. Wolinsky, FD, Miller, DK, Andresen, EM, Malmstrom, TK, and Miller, JP. Reproducibility of physical performance and physiologic assessments. J Aging Health 17: 111-124, 2005. (Pubitemid 40333508)