Measuring salience in EU legislative politics

European Union Politics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 168-182

  Warntjen, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

European Union; measurement; salience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856114207     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: 17412757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116511428495     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Achen C., Institutional realism and bargaining models. In, The European Union Decides. Thomson RStokman FAchen CKönig T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006a:86-123.
2. Achen C., Evaluating political decision making models. In, The European Union Decides. Thomson RStokman FAchen CKönig T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006b:264-298.
3. Agresti A,Finlay BStatistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 1997:.
4. Best SJ.The sampling problem in measuring policy mood: An alternative solution.Journal of Politics. 1999;61 (3): 721-740.
5. Budge I,Klingemann H-D,Volkens A,Bara J,Tanenbaum EMapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:.
6. Bueno de Mesquita B,Stokman FEuropean Community Decision-Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1994:.
7. Epstein JM,Segal JA.Measuring issue salience.American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44 (1): 66-83.
8. Fowler Jr FJ., Survey Research Methods. London: Sage; 2009:.
9. Häge F.Committee decision-making in the Council of the European Union.European Union Politics. 2007;8 (3): 299-328.
10. Hagemann S., Voting, statements and coalition-building in the Council from 1999 to 2006. In, Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels. Naurin DWallace H, ed. Houndmills: Palgrave; 2008:36-63.
11. Hayes-Renshaw F,Wallace HThe Council of Ministers. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2006:.
12. Hinich MJ,Munger MCAnalytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:.
13. Kim H-M,Fording R., Extending party estimates to governments and electors. In, Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Budge IKlingemann H-DVolkens ABara JTanenbaum E, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:157-178.
14. König T,Junge D.Why don't veto players use their power?.European Union Politics. 2009;10 (4): 507-534.
15. Laver M., Position and salience in the policies of political actors. In, Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. Laver M, ed. London: Routledge; 2001:66-75.
16. MacLean I,MacMillan AThe Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
17. Mastenbroek E.EU compliance: Still a 'black hole'?.Journal of European Public Policy. 2005;12 (6): 1103-1120.
18. Mattila M,Lane JE.Why unanimity in the Council? A roll call analysis of Council voting.European Union Politics. 2001;2 (1): 31-52.
19. Moravcsik A.Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach.Journal of Common Market Studies. 1993;31 (4): 473-524.
20. Rasmussen AEarly conclusion in the co-decision legislative procedure. 2007:.
21. Schneider G,Finke D,Bailer S.Bargaining power in the European Union: An evaluation of competing game-theoretic models.Political Studies. 2010;58 (1): 85-103.
22. Selck T.Evaluating the predictive power of a procedural model for the European Union legislative process.Journal of Legislative Studies. 2003;9 (3): 140-152.
23. Steunenberg B,Kaeding M.'As time goes by': Explaining the transposition of maritime directives.European Journal of Political Research. 2009;48 (3): 432-454.
24. Stimson JAPublic Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1991:.
25. Stratmann T., Logrolling. In, Perspectives on Public Choice. Mueller D, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:322-341.
26. Thomson R,Stokman FDecision Making in the European Union. Groningen: The Netherlands Research School ICS, Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, ICS Codebook No. 71; 2003:.
27. Thomson R,Stokman F., Research design: Measuring actors' positions, saliences and capabilities. In, The European Union Decides. Thomson RStokman FAchen CKönig T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:25-53.
28. Thomson R, Stokman F, Achen C and König T (eds)., The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
29. Tsebelis GVeto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002:.
30. Warntjen A.Steering the Union. The impact of the EU Presidency on legislative activity in the Council.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007;45 (5): 1135-1157.
31. Wlezien C.On the salience of political issues: The problem with the 'most important problem'.Electoral Studies. 2005;24 (4): 555-579.