'As time goes by: Explaining the transposition of maritime directives

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 432-454

  Steunenberg, Bernard ^a,c   Kaeding, Michael ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Institut Europeacute en d'Administration Publique   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Public Administration ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63849171298     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: 14756765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01832.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Asser Institute 2004). Implementatie van EG richtlijnen vergeleken: Een onderzoek naar de implementatiepraktijk in een aantal EU-lidstaten in het bijzonder op het terrein van het maritiem vervoer. Den Haag : Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Hoofddirectie Juridische Zaken.
2. Berglund, S., Gange, I. Waarden, F.V. (2006). Mass production of law. Routinization in the transposition of European directives: A sociological-institutionalist account. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (5 692 716.
3. Bergman, T. et al. (2003). Democratic delegation and accountability: Cross-national patterns. In K. Strøm, W.C. Müller T. Bergman (eds Delegation and accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
4. Borghetto, E., Franchino, F. Giannetti, D. (2006). Complying with the transposition deadlines of EU directives: Evidence from Italy. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 5 : 7 38.
5. Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. Jones, B.S. (2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
6. Efron, B. (1977). The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 : 557 565.
7. Falkner, G., Hartlapp, M. Treib, O. (2007). Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to European Union implementation are only 'sometimes-true theories'. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3 395 416.
8. Falkner, G. et al. (2005). Complying with Europe? The impact of EU minimum harmonization and soft law in the Member States. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
9. Friedrich, R. (1982). In defense of multiplicative regression equations. American Journal of Political Science 26 : 797 833.
10. Giuliani, M. (2003). Europeanization in comparative perspective: Institutional fit and national adaptation. In K. Featherstone C. Radaelli (eds The politics of Europeanization. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
11. Grambsch, P.M. Therneau, T.M. (1994). Proportional hazards test and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81 : 515 526.
12. Haverland, M. Romeijn, M. (2007). Do Member States make European policies work? Analysing the EU transposition deficit. Public Administration 85 (3 757 778.
13. Haverland, M., Steunenberg, B. Waarden, F. van. (2007). Understanding the EC Transposition Deficit: A Cross-sectoral Analysis. Paper presented at the 2007 ECPR General Conference in Pisa, Italy, 6-8 September.
14. Héritier, A. (1999). Policy-making and diversity in Europe: Escape from deadlock. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15. Héritier, A. et al. (2001). Differential Europe: The European Union impact on national policy making. Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield.
16. Jaccard, J. Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
17. Kaeding, M. (2006). Determinants of transposition delay in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 26 (3 229 253.
18. Kaeding, M. (2008). Lost in translation or full steam ahead: The transposition of EU transport directives across Member States. European Union Politics 9 (1 115 143.
19. König, T., Luetgert, B. Mäder, L. (2005). Troubles with Timeliness: Explaining Trends in Transposition Delay. Paper presented at the 33rd Joint Sessions of ECPR, Granada, 14-19 April.
20. Lin, D.Y. Wei, L.J. (1989). The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 : 1074 1078.
21. Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. London : Routledge.
22. Mastenbroek, E. (2003). Surviving the deadline: The transposition of EU directives in the Netherlands. European Union Politics 4 : 371 395.
23. Mastenbroek, E. Kaeding, M. (2006). Europeanization beyond the goodness of fit: Domestic politics in the forefront. Comparative European Politics 4 (4 331 354.
24. Steunenberg, B. (2007). A policy solution to the EU directives' transposition puzzle: Interaction of interests in different domestic arenas. West European Politics 30 : 23 49.
25. Steunenberg, B. Rhinard, M. (2005). Hare or turtle? Member States catching up with the transposition of EC directives (Working Paper). Leiden : Leiden University.
26. Steunenberg, B. Voermans, W. (2006). The transposition of EU directives: A comparative study of instruments, techniques and processes in six Member States. Leiden : Leiden University/WODC.
27. Strøm, K., Müller, W.C. Bergman, T. (eds 2003). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
28. Treib, O. (2006). Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs. Living Review of European Governance 1. Available online at: http://livingreviews.org/lreg-2006-1/.
29. Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press/Russell Sage Foundation.