Changing the criteria for old/new recognition judgments can modulate activity in the anterior hippocampus

Hippocampus

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 141-148

  Hashimoto, Ryusaku ^a,b,c   Abe, Nobuhito ^a   Ueno, Aya ^a   Fujii, Toshikatsu ^a   Takahashi, Shoki ^a   Mori, Etsuro ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

FMRI; Hippocampus; Novelty; Recognition memory; Repetition suppression

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84856094705     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20878     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ashburner J. 2007. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38: 95-113.
2. Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller M, Stark CE. 2008. Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science 319: 1640-1642.
3. Brett M, Anton JL, Valabregue R, Poline JB. 2002. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Neuroimage 16( Supplement 1):abstract 497.
4. Brozinsky CJ, Yonelinas AP, Kroll NE, Ranganath C. 2005. Lag-sensitive repetition suppression effects in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus. Hippocampus 15: 557-561.
5. Buchsbaum BR, D'Esposito M. 2009. Repetition suppression and reactivation in auditory-verbal short-term recognition memory. Cereb Cortex 19: 1474-1485.
6. Constable RT, Carpentier A, Pugh K, Westerveld M, Oszunar Y, Spencer DD. 2000. Investigation of the human hippocampal formation using a randomized event-related paradigm and Z-shimmed functional MRI. Neuroimage 12: 55-62.
7. Dale AM. 1999. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 109-114.
8. Daselaar SM, Fleck MS, Cabeza R. 2006a. Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: Recollection, familiarity, and novelty. J Neurophysiol 96: 1902-1911.
9. Daselaar SM, Fleck MS, Prince SE, Cabeza R. 2006b. The medial temporal lobe distinguishes old from new independently of consciousness. J Neurosci 26: 5835-5839.
10. de Zubicaray G, McMahon K, Eastburn M, Pringle AJ, Lorenz L, Humphreys MS. 2007. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia 45: 824-835.
11. Desimone R. 1996. Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13494-13499.
12. Dudukovic NM, Wagner AD. 2007. Goal-dependent modulation of declarative memory: Neural correlates of temporal recency decisions and novelty detection. Neuropsychologia 45: 2608-2620.
13. Eldridge LL, Engel SA, Zeineh MM, Bookheimer SY, Knowlton BJ. 2005. A dissociation of encoding and retrieval processes in the human hippocampus. J Neurosci 25: 3280-3286.
14. Frisk V, Milner B. 1990. The role of the left hippocampal region in the acquisition and retention of story content. Neuropsychologia 28: 349-359.
15. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SC, Frackowiak RS, Turner R. 1995. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 2: 45-53.
16. Habib R. 2001. On the relation between conceptual priming, neural priming, and novelty assessment. Scand J Psychol 42: 187-195.
17. Henson RN. 2003. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog Neurobiol 70: 53-81.
18. Henson RN, Cansino S, Herron JE, Robb WG, Rugg MD. 2003. A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? Hippocampus 13: 301-304.
19. Herron JE, Henson RN, Rugg MD. 2004. Probability effects on the neural correlates of retrieval success: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 21: 302-310.
20. Jacoby LL. 1991. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J Mem Lang 30: 513-541.
21. Johnson JD, Muftuler LT, Rugg MD. 2008. Multiple repetitions reveal functionally and anatomically distinct patterns of hippocampal activity during continuous recognition memory. Hippocampus 18: 975-980.
22. Kohler S, Danckert S, Gati JS, Menon RS. 2005. Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: A comparison based on event-related fMRI. Hippocampus 15: 763-774.
23. Kumaran D, Maguire EA. 2009. Novelty signals: A window into hippocampal information processing. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 47-54.
24. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. 2003. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 19: 1233-1239.
25. Montaldi D, Spencer TJ, Roberts N, Mayes AR. 2006. The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 16: 504-520.
26. Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev 110: 611-646.
27. O'Reilly RC, Rudy JW. 2001. Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 108: 311-345.
28. Olman CA, Davachi L, Inati S. 2009. Distortion and signal loss in medial temporal lobe. PLoS One 4: e8160.
29. Pihlajamaki M, Tanila H, Kononen M, Hanninen T, Hamalainen A, Soininen H, Aronen HJ. 2004. Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19: 1939-1949.
30. Ranganath C, D'Esposito M. 2001. Medial temporal lobe activity associated with active maintenance of novel information. Neuron 31: 865-873.
31. Rorden C, Karnath HO, Bonilha L. 2007. Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 1081-1088.
32. Rugg MD, Henson RN, Robb WG. 2003. Neural correlates of retrieval processing in the prefrontal cortex during recognition and exclusion tasks. Neuropsychologia 41: 40-52.
33. Saykin AJ, Johnson SC, Flashman LA, McAllister TW, Sparling M, Darcey TM, Moritz CH, Guerin SJ, Weaver J, Mamourian A. 1999. Functional differentiation of medial temporal and frontal regions involved in processing novel and familiar words: An fMRI study. Brain 122(Part 10): 1963-1971.
34. Sokolov EN. 1963. Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annu Rev Physiol 25: 545-580.
35. Strange BA, Hurlemann R, Duggins A, Heinze HJ, Dolan RJ. 2005. Dissociating intentional learning from relative novelty responses in the medial temporal lobe. Neuroimage 25: 51-62.
36. Tulving E, Markowitsch HJ, Kapur S, Habib R, Houle S. 1994. Novelty encoding networks in the human brain: Positron emission tomography data. Neuroreport 5: 2525-2528.
37. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M. 2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15: 273-289.
38. Vilberg KL, Rugg MD. 2009. An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory. Neuroimage 45: 562-571.
39. Yassa MA, Stark CE. 2008. Multiple signals of recognition memory in the medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus 18: 945-954.
40. Yonelinas AP, Otten LJ, Shaw KN, Rugg MD. 2005. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J Neurosci 25: 3002-3008.