Comparison of in vitro methods of measuring mucoadhesion: Ellipsometry, tensile strength and rheological measurements

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Volumn 92, Issue , 2012, Pages 353-359

  Ivarsson, David ^a   Wahlgren, Marie ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Carbopol; Chitosan; Ellipsometry; Hydroxyethyl cellulose; Mucoadhesion; Noveon; Polyvinyl pyrrolidone; Rheology; Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose; Tensile strength

Indexed keywords

CARBOPOL; HYDROXYETHYL CELLULOSE; MUCOADHESION; NOVEON; POLY VINYL PYRROLIDONE; SODIUM CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE;

CELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; ELASTICITY; ELLIPSOMETRY; POLYMERS; RHEOLOGY; SODIUM;

TENSILE STRENGTH;

CARBOMER; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE; MUCIN; NOVEON; POLYACRYLIC ACID; POLYMER; POVIDONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ELLIPSOMETRY; FLOW KINETICS; HYDROGEN BOND; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAXIMUM DETACHMENT FORCE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MUCIN VISCOSITY; MUCOADHESION; PH; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; POLYMER VISCOSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SHEAR RATE; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOTAL WORK OF ADHESION; VISCOSITY;

ADHESIVENESS; ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MUCINS; POLYMERS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RHEOLOGY; SUS SCROFA; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84856089110     PISSN: 09277765     EISSN: 18734367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Edsman K., Hägerström H. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2005, 57:3-22.
2. Glantz P.O., Arnebrant T., Nylander T., Baier R.E. Bioadhesion-a phenomenon with multiple dimensions. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1999, 57:238-241.
3. Lee J.W., Park J.H., Robinson J.R. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 89:850-866.
4. Lehr C.M. Lectin-mediated drug delivery: the second generation of bioadhesives. J. Control. Release 2000, 65:19-29.
5. Martini A., Bonadeo D., Bottoni G., Caramella C., Esposito P., Gazzaniga A., Merlo M., Muggetti L., Orlandi R., Rossi S. Bioadhesives: rationale, state of the art and therapeutic potential. Boll. Chim. Farm. 1995, 134:595-603.
6. Ponchel G., Irache J. Specific and non-specific bioadhesive particulate systems for oral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1998, 34:191-219.
7. Takeuchi H., Yamamoto H., Kawashima Y. Mucoadhesive nanoparticulate systems for peptide drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47:39-54.
8. Smart J.D. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57:1556-1568.
9. Malmsten M., Ljusgren I., Carlstedt I. Ellipsometry studies of mucoadhesion of cellulose derivatives. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 1994, 2:463-470.
10. Svensson O., Thuresson K., Arnebrant T. Interaction between chitosan-modified particles and mucin-coated surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 325:346-350.
11. Svensson O., Thuresson K., Arnebrant T. Interactions between drug delivery particles and mucin in solution and at interfaces. Langmuir 2008, 24:2573-2579.
12. Wong C.F., Yuen K.H., Peh K.K. An in vitro method for buccal adhesion studies: importance of instrument variables. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 180:47-57.
13. Wong C.F., Yuen K.H., Peh K.K. Formulation and evaluation of controlled release Eudragit buccal patches. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 178:11-22.
14. Burgalassi S., Panichi L., Saettone M.F., Jacobsen J., Rassing M.R. Development and in vitro/in vivo testing of mucoadhesive buccal patches releasing benzydamine and lidocaine. Int. J. Pharm. 1996, 133:1-7.
15. Jacques Y., Buri P. An investigation of the physical behaviour of moisture-activated mucoadhesive hydrogels upon contact with biological and non-biological substrates. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1997, 72:225-232.
16. Kriwet B., Walter E., Kissel T. Synthesis of bioadhesive poly(acrylic acid) nano- and microparticles using an inverse emulsion polymerization method for the entrapment of hydrophilic drug candidates. J. Control. Release 1998, 56:149-158.
17. Ahn J.S., Choi H.K., Chun M.K., Ryu J.M., Jung J.H., Kim Y.U., Cho C.S. Release of triamcinolone acetonide from mucoadhesive polymer composed of chitosan and poly(acrylic acid) in vitro. Biomaterials 2002, 23:1411-1416.
18. Hassan E.E., Gallo J.M. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm. Res. 1990, 7:491-495.
19. Madsen F., Eberth K., Smart J.D. A rheological examination of the mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: the effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. J. Control. Release 1998, 50:167-178.
20. Oechsner M., Keipert S. Polyacrylic acid/polyvinylpyrrolidone bipolymeric systems. I. Rheological and mucoadhesive properties of formulations potentially useful for the treatment of dry-eye-syndrome. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1999, 47:113-118.
21. Riley R.G., Smart J.D., Tsibouklis J., Dettmar P.W., Hampson F., Davis J.A., Kelly G., Wilber W.R. An investigation of mucus/polymer rheological synergism using synthesised and characterised poly(acrylic acid)s. Int. J. Pharm. 2001, 217:87-100.
22. Rossi S., Bonferoni M.C., Caramella C., Ironi L., Tentoni S. Model-based interpretation of creep profiles for the assessment of polymer-mucin interaction. Pharm. Res. 1999, 16:1456-1463.
23. Hägerström H., Paulsson M., Edsman K. Evaluation of mucoadhesion for two polyelectrolyt gels in simulated physological conditions using a rheological method. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 9.
24. Mortazavi S.A. An in vitro assessment of mucus/mucoadhesive interactions. Int. J. Pharm. 1995, 124:173-182.
25. Chary R.B., Vani G., Rao Y.M. In vitro and in vivo adhesion testing of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1999, 25:685-690.
26. Ferrari F., Rossi S., Bonferoni M.C., Caramella C., Karlsen J. Characterization of rheological and mucoadhesive properties of three grades of chitosan hydrochloride. Farmaco 1997, 52:493-497.
27. Filipovic-Grcic J., Skalko-Basnet N., Jalsenjak I. Mucoadhesive chitosan-coated liposomes: characteristics and stability. J. Microencapsul. 2001, 18:3-12.
28. Ozsoy Y., Tuncel T., Can A., Akev N., Birteksoz S., Gerceker A. In vivo studies on nasal preparations of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. Pharmazie 2000, 55:607-609.
29. Gurny R., Meyer J.M., Peppas N.A. Bioadhesive intraoral release systems: design, testing and analysis. Biomaterials 1984, 5:336-340.
30. Ahuja A., Khar R.K., Chaudhry R. Evaluation of buccoadhesive metronidazole tablets: microbiological response. Pharmazie 1998, 53:264-267.
31. Pedrazzi V., Lara E.H., Dal Ciampo J.O., Panzeri H. Tensile bond strength of a polymeric intra-buccal bioadhesive: the mucin role. Boll. Chim. Farm. 2001, 140:471-474.
32. Eouani C., Piccerelle P., Prinderre P., Bourret E., Joachim J. In vitro comparative study of buccal mucoadhesive performance of different polymeric films. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2001, 52:45-55.
33. Li C., Bhatt P.P., Johnston T.P. Transmucosal delivery of oxytocin to rabbits using a mucoadhesive buccal patch. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 1997, 2:265-274.
34. Akiyama Y., Nagahara N., Kashihara T., Hirai S., Toguchi H. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive microspheres prepared for the gastrointestinal tract using polyglycerol esters of fatty acids and a poly(acrylic acid) derivative. Pharm. Res. 1995, 12:397-405.
35. Ilan E., Amselem S., Weisspapir M., Schwarz J., Yogev A., Zawoznik E., Friedman D. Improved oral delivery of desmopressin via a novel vehicle: mucoadhesive submicron emulsion. Pharm. Res. 1996, 13:1083-1087.
36. Callens C., Adriaens E., Dierckens K., Remon J.P. Toxicological evaluation of a bioadhesive nasal powder containing a starch and Carbopol 974 P on rabbit nasal mucosa and slug mucosa. J. Control. Release 2001, 76:81-91.
37. Ugwoke M.I., Agu R.U., Vanbilloen H., Baetens J., Augustijns P., Verbeke N., Mortelmans L., Verbruggen A., Kinget R., Bormans G. Scintigraphic evaluation in rabbits of nasal drug delivery systems based on carbopol 971p((R)) and carboxymethylcellulose. J. Control. Release 2000, 68:207-214.
38. Madsen F., Eberth K., Smart J.D. A rheological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenised mucus gel. Biomaterials 1998, 19:1083-1092.
39. Tamburic S., Craig D.Q.M. An investigation into the rheological, dielectric and mucoadhesive properties of poly(acrylic acid) gel systems. J. Control. Release 1995, 37:59-68.
40. Arnebrant T. Proteins at the Metal/Water Interface - Adsorption in Relation to Interfacial Structure 1987, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
41. Wahlgren M., Arnebrant T. Adsorption of β-lactoglobulin onto silica, methylated silica and polysulphone. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 136:259-265.
42. Cuypers P.A., Corsel J.W., Janssen M.P., Kop J.M.M., Hermens W.T., Hemker H.C. The adsorption of prothrombin to phosphatidylserin multylayers qantitated by ellipsometry. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258:2426-2434.
43. Hagesaether E., Sande S.A. In vitro measurements of mucoadhesive properties of six types of pectin. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2007, 33:417-425.
44. Ponchel G., Touchard F., Duchêne D., Peppas N.A. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled-release systems. I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in poly(acrylic acid)-containing systems. J. Control. Release 1987, 5:129-141.
45. Illum L., Jabbal-Gil l I., Hinchcliffe M., Fisher A.N., Davis S.S. Chitosan as a novel nasal delivery system for vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 51:81-96.
46. Efremova N.V., Huang Y., Peppas N.A., Lecknand D.E. Direct measurements of interaction between tethered poly(ethylene glycol) chains and adsorbed mucin layers. Langmuir 2002, 18:836-845.
47. Park H., Robinson J.R. Mechanisms of mucoadhesion of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm. Res. 1987, 4:457-464.
48. Mortazavi S.A., Smart J.D. An investigation of some factors influencing the in vitro assessment of mucoadhesion. Int. J. Pharm. 1995, 116:223-230.
49. Baumgartner S., Kristl J., Peppas N.A. Network structure of cellulose ethers used in pharmaceutical applications during swelling and at equilibrium. Pharm. Res. 2002, 19:1084-1090.
50. Marshall P., Snaar J.E., Ng Y.L., Bowtell R.W., Hampson F.C., Dettmar P.W., Melia C.D. A novel application of NMR microscopy: measurement of water diffusion inside bioadhesive bonds. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001, 19:487-488.
51. Marshall P., Snaar J.E., Ng Y.L., Bowtell R.W., Hampson F.C., Dettmar P.W., Melia C.D. Localised mapping of water movement and hydration inside a developing bioadhesive bond. J. Control. Release 2004, 95.
52. Chickering D.E., Harris W.P., Mathiowitz E. A microtensiometer for the analysis of bioadhesive microspheres. Biomed. Instrum. Technol. 1995, 29:501-512.
53. Santos C.A., Jacob J.S., Hertzog B.A., Freedman B.D., Press D.L., Harnpicharnchai P., Mathiowitz E. Correlation of two bioadhesion assays: the everted sac technique and the CAHN microbalance. J. Control. Release 1999, 61:113-122.
54. Henriksen I., Green K.L., Smart J.D., Smistad G., Karlsen J. Bioadhesion of hydrated chitosans: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int. J. Pharm. 1997, 145:231-240.
55. Senel S., Capan Y., Sargon M.F., Giray C.B., Hincal A.A. Histological and bioadhesion studies on buccal bioadhesive tablets containing a penetration enhancer sodium glycodeoxycholate. Int. J. Pharm. 1998, 170:239-245.
56. Jackson S.J., Perkins A.C. In vitro assessment of the mucoadhesion of cholestyramine to porcine and human gastric mucosa. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2001, 52:121-127.
57. Rossi S., Bonferoni M.C., Ferrari F., Bertoni M., Caramella C. Characterization of mucin interaction with three viscosity grades if sodium carboxymethylcellulose: comparison between rheological and tensile testing. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996, 4:189-196.
58. Rossi S., Ferrari F., Bonferoni M.C., Caramella C. Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride-mucin rheological interaction: influence of polymer concentration and polymer:mucin weight ratio. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 12:479-485.
59. Hägerström H., Edsman K. Limitations of the rheological mucoadhesion method: the effect of the choice of conditions and the rheological synergism parameter. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 18:349-357.