WetSpa model application in the Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP2)

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 418-419, Issue , 2012, Pages 78-89

  Safari, Alireza ^a   De Smedt, F ^a   Moreda, Fekadu ^b,c  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b Riverside Technology Inc   (United States)

^c NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

DMIP; NEXRAD rainfall data; PEST; Streamflow simulation; Ungaged basin; WetSpa

Indexed keywords

DMIP; NEXRAD RAINFALL DATA; PEST; STREAMFLOW SIMULATION; UNGAGED BASIN; WETSPA;

CALIBRATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLOW RATE; GEOLOGIC MODELS; LANDFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RAIN; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION; DATA SET; DATABASE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND USE; NUMERICAL MODEL; RADAR; RAINFALL; SOIL TYPE; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STREAMFLOW; TOPOGRAPHY; WATERSHED;

BLUE BASIN; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856064897     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ajami N.K., Gupta H., Sorooshian S., Wagener T. Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:112-135.
2. Al-Abed N.A., Whiteley H.R. Calibration of the hydrological simulation program Fortran (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems. Hydrological Processes 2002, 16:3169-3188.
3. Andersen J.A., Refsgaard J.C., Jensen K.H. Distributed hydrological modeling of the Senegal River Basin-model construction and validation. Journal of Hydrology 2001, 247:200-214.
4. Andersen J., Dybkjaer G., Jensen K.H., Refsgaard J.C., Rasmussen K. Use of remotely sensed precipitation and leaf area index in a distributed hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 264:34-50.
5. Bahremand A., De Smedt F. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a GIS-based flood simulation model using PEST. Journal of WSEAS Transaction on Environment and Development 2006, 2:29-37.
6. Bahremand A., De Smedt F. Distributed hydrological modeling and sensitivity analysis in Torysa watershed, Slovakia. Journal of Water Resources Management 2007, 22:393-408.
7. Bahremand A., De Smedt F., Corluy J., Liu Y. Application of WetSpa model for assessing land use impacts on floods in the Margecany-Hornad watershed, Slovakia. Journal of Water Science Technology 2006, 53:37-45.
8. Bandaragoda C., Tarboton D.G., Woods R. Application of TOPNET in the distributed model intercomparison project. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:178-201.
9. Butts, M.B., Overgaard, J., Viaene, P., Dubicki, A., Stronska, K., Szalinska, W., Lewandowski, A., Olszewski, T., Kolerski, T., 2005. Flexible process-based hydrological modelling framework for flood forecasting-MIKE SHE. In: International Conference on Innovation, Advances and Implementation of Flood Forecasting Technology, Troms, Norway, 10pp.
10. Carpenter T.M., Georgakakos K.P. Continuous streamflow simulation with the HRCDHM distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:61-79.
11. De Smedt F., Liu Y.B., Gebremeskel S. Hydrological modeling on a watershed scale using GIS and remote sensed land use information. Risk Analyses 2000, 10. WIT press, Southampton, Boston. C.A. Brebbia (Ed.).
12. Doherty J., Johnston J.M. Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2003, 39(2):251-265.
13. Eagleson P.S. Climate, soil, and vegetation, a simplified model of soil moisture movement in liquid phase. Water Resources Research 1978, 14(5):722-730.
14. Famiglietti J.S., Wood E.F. Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes. Water Resources Research 1994, 30(11):3061-3078.
15. Farnsworth R.K., Thompson E.S. Mean Monthly, Seasonal, and Annual Pan Evaporation for the United States 1982, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service., Washington, DC.
16. Farnsworth, R.K., Thompson, E.S., Peck, E.L., 1982. Evaporation Atlas for the Contiguous 48 United States. In: Technical Report NWS, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Washington, DC.
17. Goegebeur M., Pauwels V.R. Improvement of the PEST parameter estimation algorithm through extended Kalman filtering. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 337:436-451.
18. Greene, D.R., Hudlow, M.D., 1982. Hydrometeorological grid mapping procedures. In: International Symposium on Hydrometeorology. American Water Resources Associations, Denver, Colorado.
19. Henderson F.M. Open Channel Flow 1966, McMillan, New York.
20. Henriksen H.J., Troldborg L., Nyegaard P., Sonnenborg T.O., Refsgaard J.C., Madsen B. Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark. Journal of Hydrology 2003, 280:52-71.
21. Ivanov V.Y., Vivoni E.R., Bras R.L., Entekhabi D. Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: a fully-distributed physically-based approach. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:80-111.
22. Koren, V., Schaake, J., Duan, Q., Smith, M., Cong, S., 1998. PET Upgrades to NWSRFS, Project Plan. Washington, DC, unpublished report.
23. Liu, Y.B., De Smedt, F., 2004. WetSpa Extension, Documentation and User Manual. Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, 108pp.
24. Liu Y.B., Gebremeskel S., De Smedt F., Hoffmann L., Pfister L. A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling. Journal of Hydrology 2003, 283:91-106.
25. Liu Y.B., Batelaan O., De Smedt F., Poorova J., Velcicka L. Automated calibration applied to a GIS-based flood simulation model using PEST. Floods, from Defense to Management 2005, 11. Taylor-Francis Group, London. J. van Alphen, E. Van Beek, M. Taal (Eds.).
26. McCuen R.H., Snyder W.M. A proposed index for comparing hydrographs. Water Resources Research 1975, 11(6):1021-1024.
27. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10:282-290.
28. Nossent, J., Bauwens, W., 2007. Comparing SWAT and WetSpa on the River Grote Laak, Belgium. In: The Fourth International SWAT Conference. Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands, 9pp.
29. Olivera F., Famiglietti J., Asante K. Global-scale flow routing using a source-to-sink algorithm. Water Resources Research 2000, 36:2197-2207.
30. Reed S., Koren V., Smith M.B., Zhang Z., Moreda F., Seo D.-J. Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:27-60. DMIP Participants.
31. Reed S., Schaake J., Zhang Z. A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 337:402-420.
32. Smith M.B., Georgakakos K.P., Liang X. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP). Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:1-3.
33. Smith M.B., Seo D.-J., Koren V.I., Reed S.M., Zhang Z., Duan Q., Moreda F., Cong S. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298:4-26.
34. Smith, M.B., Koren, V.I., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Cui, Z., Reed, S., Moreda, F., Mizukami, N., Cosgrove, B., and DMIP2 Participants, 2009. Overall Results from the DMIP2 Oklahoma Experiments. Journal of Hydrology, this issue.
35. Thornthwaite C.W., Mather J.R. The water balance: publications in climatology 1995, vol. 8. Laboratory of Climatology, Centerton, NJ.
36. Wang X., Melesse A.M. Evaluation of the SWAT model's snowmelt hydrology in a northwestern Minnesota watershed. Journal of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2005, 48(4):1359-1376.
37. Wang Z., Batelaan O., De Smedt F. A distributed model for water and energy transfer between soil, plants and atmosphere (WetSpa). Journal of Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 1997, 21:189-193.
38. Zeinivand, H., De Smedt, F., Bahremand, A., 2007. Simulation of Basin Runoff Due to Rainfall and Snowmelt. In: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand, 7pp.
39. Zyvoloski G., Kwicklis E., Eddebbarh A.A., Arnold B., Faunt C., Robinson B.A. The site-scale saturated zone flow model for Yucca Mountain: calibration of different conceptual models and their impact on flow paths. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2003, 62-63:731-750.