Inertia effects on characterization of dynamic response of brain tissue

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 434-439

  Sanborn, B ^a   Nie, X ^b,c   Chen, W ^b,c   Weerasooriya, T ^a  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain tissue; Dynamic response; Mechanical behavior; Radial inertia; Shear response

Indexed keywords

AXIAL STRAIN; BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; BLAST LOADING; BOVINE BRAIN; BRAIN TISSUE; COMPRESSIVE RESPONSE; CONSTITUTIVE BEHAVIORS; DYNAMIC LOADINGS; HIGH RATE; HIGH SPEED IMAGE; INDUCED STRESS; INERTIA EFFECTS; INHOMOGENEOUS DEFORMATION; KOLSKY BAR; LOADING RATE; MATERIAL RESPONSE; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; MECHANICAL RESPONSE; MODELING AND SIMULATION; MULTIAXIAL STRESS STATE; PURE SHEAR; RADIAL DEFORMATION; RADIAL INERTIA; RADIAL STRESS; SHEAR RESPONSE; SOFT MATERIAL; SPECIMEN GEOMETRY; STRESS-STRAIN; TEST SAMPLES; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES;

BRAIN; CHARACTERIZATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; DYNAMICS; LOADING; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS ANALYSIS; TISSUE;

STRAIN RATE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN SLICE; BRAIN TISSUE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INERTIA; LOADING TEST; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICAL TORSION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SHEAR RATE; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; BRAIN INJURIES; CATTLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84856060764     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Atay S., Kroenke C., Sabet A., Bayly P. Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastrography. Journal of Biomechancial Engineering 2008, 130:21013-21111.
2. Casem D., Weerasooriya T., Moy P. Inertial effects of quartz force transducers embedded in a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Experimental Mechanics 2005, 45(4):368-376.
3. Chen W., Zhang B., Forrestal M. A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials. Experimental Mechanics 1998, 39(2):81-85.
4. Chen W., Lu F., Zhou B. A quartz-crystal-embedded split Hopkinson pressure bar for soft materials. Experimental Mechanics 2000, 40(1):1-6.
5. Chen W., Song B. Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications 2011, Springer, New York, (pp. 12-17).
6. Donnelly B., Medige J. Shear properties of human brain tissue. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1997, 1:423-432.
7. Estes, M., McElhaney, J., 1970. Response of brain tissue of compressive loading. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ASME Biomechanics Conference. ASME Paper no. 70-BHF-13, pp. 1-4.
8. Garo A., Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M. Towards a reliable characterization of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: the effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation. Biorheology 2007, 44(1):51-58.
9. Gilat, A., 2000. Torsional Kolsky bar testing. In: ASM Metal Handbook, vol. 8. Material Park, OH, pp. 505-515.
10. Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M., Wismans J.S.H.M. The mechanical behavior of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modeling. Biorheology 2006, 43:623-636.
11. Kolsky H. An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section B 1949, 62:676-700.
12. Miller K., Chinzei K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. Journal of Biomechanics 2002, 34:483-490.
13. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Report to Congress on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Steps to Prevent a Serious Public Health Problem 2003, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
14. Nicolle S., Lounis M., Willinger R. Shear properties of brain tissue over a frequency range relevant for automotive impact situations: new experimental results. Stapp Car Crash Journal 2004, 48:239-258.
15. Nie X., Prabhu R., Chen W., Caruthers J., Weerasooriya T. A Kolsky torsion bar technique for characterization of the dynamic shear response of soft materials. Experimental Mechanics 2011, 51:1527-1534.
16. Pervin F., Chen W. Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42:731-735.
17. Scheidler, M., Raftenburg, M., 2010. Formation of gaps at the specimen-bar interfaces in numerical simulations of compressible Hopkinson bar tests of soft, nearly incompressible materials. Army Research Lab Technical Report. ARL-TR-5301.
18. Song B., Chen W. Split Hopkinson pressure bar techniques for characterizing soft materials. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 2005, 2(2):113-152.
19. Song B., Chen W., Ge Y., Weeresooriya T. Dynamic and quasi-static compression response of porcine muscle. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:2999-3005.
20. Song B., Ge Y., Chen W., Weerasooriya T. Radial inertia effects in Kolsky bar testing of extra soft specimens. Experimental Mechanics 2007, 47:659-670.
21. Taber K., Warden D., Hurley R. Blast-related traumatic injury: what is known?. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2006, 18(2):141-145.
22. Warren T.L., Forrestal M.J. Comments on the effect of radial inertia in the Kolsky bar test for an incompressible material. Experimental Mechanics 2010, 50(8):1-3.
23. Zhang J., Yoganandan N., Pint F.A., Guan Y., Shender B., Paskoff G., Purushottam L. Effects of tissue preservation temperature on high strain-rate material properties of brain. Journal of Biomechanics 2011, 44:391-396.