Effects of tissue preservation temperature on high strain-rate material properties of brain

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 391-396

  Zhang, Jiangyue ^a   Yoganandan, Narayan ^a   Pintar, Frank A ^a   Guan, Yabo ^a   Shender, Barry ^b   Paskoff, Glenn ^b   Laud, Purushottam ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain tissue; High strain rate; Material properties; Postmortem; Tissue preservation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN TISSUE; HIGH-STRAIN-RATE; MATERIAL PROPERTY; POSTMORTEM; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MODELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GAGES; HISTOLOGY; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; STRESS-STRAIN CURVES; TISSUE;

STRAIN RATE;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BRAIN LEVEL; BRAIN TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SHEAR STRESS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STORAGE TEMPERATURE; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; SWINE; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TISSUE PREPARATION; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; TEMPERATURE; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

EID: 78651466766     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arbogast K.B., Margulies S.S. Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. J. Biomech. 1998, 31(9):801-807.
2. Arbogast K.B., Margulies S.S. A fiber-reinforced composite model of the viscoelastic behavior of the brainstem in shear. J. Biomech. 1999, 32(8):865-870.
3. Arbogast K.B., Thibault K.L., Pinheiro B.S., Winey K.I., Margulies S.S. A high-frequency shear device for testing soft biological tissues. J. Biomech. 1997, 30(7):757-759.
4. Brands D.W.A., Bovendeerd P.H.M., Peters G.W.M., Wismans J.S.H.M. The large shear strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and a silicone gel model material. Stapp Car Crash J. 2000, 44:249-260.
5. Brands, D.W.A., Bovendeerd, P.H.M., Peters, G.W.M., Wismans, J.S.H.M., Paas, M.H.J.W., van Bree, J.L.M.J., 1999. Comparison of the dynamic behavior of brain tissue and two model materials. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, San Diego, California, pp. 350-358.
6. Brands D.W.A., Bovendeerd P.H.M., Wismans J.S.H.M. On the potential importance of non-linear viscoelastic material modelling for numerical prediction of brain tissue response: test and application. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002, 46:103-121.
7. Cernak I., Wang Z., Jiang J., Bian X., Savic J. Ultrastructural and functional characteristics of blast injury-induced neurotrauma. J. Trauma 2001, 50(4):695-706.
8. Cooper G.J., Maynard R.L., Cross N.L., Hill J.F. Casualties from terrorist bombings. J. Trauma 1983, 23(11):955-967.
9. Darvish K.K., Crandall J.R. Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. Med. Eng. Phys. 2001, 23(9):633-645.
10. Frykberg E.R. Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope?. J. Trauma 2002, 53(2):201-212.
11. Garo A., Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M. Towards a reliable characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: the effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation. Biorheology 2007, 44(1):51-58.
12. Hill J.F. Blast injury with particular reference to recent terrorist bombing incidents. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1979, 61(1):4-11.
13. Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M., Wismans J.S.H.M. The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. Biorheology 2006, 43(5):623-636.
14. Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M., Wismans J.S.H.M. Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue in compression and shear. Biorheology 2008, 45(6):663-676.
15. Kleiven S. Finite Element Modeling of the Human Head 2002, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Mellor S.G. The relationship of blast loading to death and injury from explosion. World J. Surg. 1992, 16(5):893-898.
17. Mellor S.G., Cooper G.J. Analysis of 828 servicemen killed or injured by explosion in Northern Ireland 1970-84: the hostile action casualty system. Br. J. Surg. 1989, 76(10):1006-1010.
18. Metz H., McElhaney J., Ommaya A.K. A comparison of the elasticity of live, dead, and fixed brain tissue. J. Biomech. 1970, 3(4):453-458.
19. Miller K. Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. J. Biomech. 1999, 32(5):531-537.
20. Miller K., Chinzei K. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. J. Biomech. 1997, 30(11-12):1115-1121.
21. Miller K., Chinzei K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J. Biomech. 2002, 35(4):483-490.
22. Nicolle S., Lounis M., Willinger R. Shear properties of brain tissue over a frequency range relevant for automotive impact situations: new experimental results. Stapp Car Crash J. 2004, 48:239-258.
23. Pervin F., Chen W.W. Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression. J. Biomech. 2009, 42(6):731-735.
24. Ruan J.S., Khalil T., King A.I. Dynamic response of the human head to impact by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 1994, 116(1):44-50.
25. Scott B.A., Fletcher J.R., Pulliam M.W., Harris R.D. The Beirut terrorist bombing. Neurosurgery 1986, 18(1):107-110.
26. Shen F., Tay T.E., Li J.Z., Nigen S., Lee P.V., Chan H.K. Modified Bilston nonlinear viscoelastic model for finite element head injury studies. J. Biomech. Eng. 2006, 128(5):797-801.
27. Shuck L.Z., Advani S.H. Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear. J. Basic Eng. 1972, 94:905-911.
28. Takhounts E.G., Eppinger R.H., Campbell Q.J., Tannous R.E., Power E.D. On the development of the SIMon finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003, 47:1-18.
29. Thibault K.L., Margulies S.S. Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. J. Biomech. 1998, 31(12):1119-1126.
30. 2000, Springer, New York, NY. G. Verbeke, G. Molensberghs (Eds.).
31. Zhang J., Song B., Pintar F.A., Yoganandan N., Chen W., Gennarelli T.A. How to test brain and brain simulant at ballistic and blast strain rates. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2008, 44:129-134.
32. Zhang J., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A., Gennarelli T.A. Temporal cavity and pressure distribution in a brain simulant following ballistic penetration. J. Neurotrauma. 2005, 22(11):1335-1347.
33. Zhang, J., Yoganandan, N., Pintar, F.A., Gennarelli, T.A., 2006. Experimental and finite element modeling of penetrating traumatic brain injury. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact, Madrid, Spain, pp. 93-101.
34. Zhang J., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A., Gennarelli T.A., Shender B.S. A finite element study of blast traumatic brain injury-biomed 2009. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2009, 45:119-124.
35. Zhang J., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A., Guan Y., Gennarelli T.A. Experimental model for civilian ballistic brain injury biomechanics quantification. J. Biomech. 2007, 40(10):2341-2346.
36. Zhang L., Yang K.H., King A.I. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126(2):226-236.