Forskelle i mandlige og kvindelige medicinstuderendes tilgang til simulation

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 173, Issue 49, 2011, Pages 3170-3173

  Konge, Lars ^a   Ali, Amir ^a   Sørensen, Morten ^a   Bitsch, Mikael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BRONCHOSCOPY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECREATION; STATISTICS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; BRONCHOSCOPY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84856038176     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pedersen LT, Bak NH, Dissing AS et al. Gender bias in specialty preferences among Danish medical students: a cross-sectional study. Dan Med Bul 2011;58:A4304.
2. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2664-9.
3. Kimura D. Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1996;6:259-63.
4. Greene KS, Gynther MD. Blue versus periwinkle: color identification and gender. Percept Mot Skills 1995;80:27-32.
5. Kron FW, Gjerde CL, Sen A et al. Medical student attitudes toward video games and related new media technologies in medical education. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:50.
6. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P et al. Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1082-5.
7. Madan AK, Harper JL, Frantzides CT et al. Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1686-9.
8. Konge L, Arendrup H, Buchwald CV et al. Virtual reality simulation of basic pulmonary procedures. J Bronchol Intervent Pulmonol 2011;18:38-41.
9. Konge L, Arendrup H, von Buchwald C et al. Using performance in multiple simu lated scenarios to assess bronchoscopy skills. Respiration 2011;81:483-90.
10. Illeris K. Læring, dispositioner og forudsætninger. I: Illeris K. Læring. 2. udg. København: Roskilde Universitetsforlag, 2006:185-206.
11. Illeris K. Læringens drivkraft-dimension. I: Illeris K. Læring. 2 udg. København: Roskilde Universitetsforlag, 2006:89-107.
12. Lucas K, Sherry JL. Sex differences in video game play. Communication Research 2004;31:499-523.
13. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:978-88.
14. Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006;243:291-300.
15. Knudsen AL. Pæne piger og dumme drenge. 1 udg. København: Schønberg, 2002.
16. Feldman LS, Sherman V, Fried GM. Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use? Surgery 2004;135:28-42.
17. Konge L, Larsen KR, Clementsen P et al. Reliable and valid assessment of clinical bronchoscopy performance. Respiration 2011 (e-pub ahead of print).
18. Ost D, DeRosiers A, Britt EJ et al. Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:2248-55.
19. Colt HG, Crawford SW, Galbraith O III. Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training. Chest 2001;120:1333-9.
20. Moorthy K, Smith S, Brown T et al. Evaluation of virtual reality bronchoscopy as a learning and assessment tool. Respiration 2003;70:195-9.