Latent semantic word sense induction and disambiguation

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 1476-1485

  Van De Cruys, Tim ^a   Apidianaki, Marianna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC INDUCTION; LATENT SEMANTICS; SENSE INVENTORIES; UNIFIED MODEL; WORD SENSE; WORD SPACES;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84856031819     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Eneko Agirre and Aitor Soroa. 2007. SemEval-2007 Task 02: Evaluating word sense induction and discrimination systems. In Proceedings of the fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval), ACL, pages 7-12, Prague, Czech Republic.
2. Eneko Agirre, David Martínez, Ojer López de Lacalle, and Aitor Soroa. 2006. Two graph-based algorithms for state-of-the-art WSD. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-06), pages 585-593, Sydney, Australia.
3. Marianna Apidianaki and Tim Van de Cruys. 2011. A Quantitative Evaluation of Global Word Sense Induction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing), published in Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), volume 6608, pages 253-264, Tokyo, Japan.
4. Javier Artiles, Enrique Amigó, and Julio Gonzalo. 2009. The role of named entities in web people search. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-09), pages 534-542, Singapore.
5. Stefan Bordag. 2006. Word sense induction: Tripletbased clustering and automatic evaluation. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-06), pages 137-144, Trento, Italy.
6. Zellig S. Harris. 1954. Distributional structure. Word, 10(23):146-162.
7. Eduard Hovy, Mitchell Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance Ramshaw, and Ralph Weischedel. 2006. Ontonotes: the 90% solution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology / North American Association of Computational Linguistics conference (HLT-NAACL-06), pages 57-60, New York, NY.
8. Nancy Ide and YorickWilks. 2007. Making Sense About Sense. In Eneko Agirre and Philip Edmonds, editors, Word Sense Disambiguation, Algorithms and Applications, pages 47-73. Springer.
9. Thomas Landauer and Susan Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychology Review, 104:211-240.
10. Thomas Landauer, Peter Foltz, and Darrell Laham. 1998. An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25:295-284.
11. Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung. 2000. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 13, pages 556-562.
12. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic Retrieval and Clustering of Similar Words. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), volume 2, pages 768-774, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
13. Suresh Manandhar, Ioannis P. Klapaftis, Dmitriy Dligach, and Sameer S. Pradhan. 2010. SemEval-2010 Task 14: Word Sense Induction & Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the fifth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), ACL-10, pages 63-68, Uppsala, Sweden.
14. Roberto Navigli. 2009. Word Sense Disambiguation: a Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2):1-69.
15. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-06), pages 2216-2219, Genoa, Italy.
16. Sebastian Padó and Mirella Lapata. 2007. Dependencybased construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2):161-199.
17. Patrick Pantel and Dekang Lin. 2002. Discovering word senses from text. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 613-619, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
18. Ted Pedersen. 2010. Duluth-WSI: SenseClusters Applied to the Sense Induction Task of SemEval-2. In Proceedings of the fifth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2010), pages 363-366, Uppsala, Sweden.
19. Amruta Purandare and Ted Pedersen. 2004. Word Sense Discrimination by Clustering Contexts in Vector and Similarity Spaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 41-48, Boston, MA.
20. Andrew Rosenberg and Julia Hirschberg. 2007. Vmeasure: A conditional entropy-based external cluster evaluation measure. In Proceedings of the Joint 2007 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 410-420, Prague, Czech Republic.
21. Hinrich Schütze. 1998. Automatic Word Sense Discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):97-123.
22. Kristina Toutanova and Christopher D. Manning. 2000. Enriching the Knowledge Sources Used in a Maximum Entropy Part-of-Speech Tagger. In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (EMNLP/VLC-2000), pages 63-70.
23. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-Rich Part-of- Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology / North American Association of Computational Linguistics conference (HLT-NAACL-03, pages 252-259, Edmonton, Canada.
24. Tim Van de Cruys. 2008. Using Three Way Data for Word Sense Discrimination. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-08), pages 929-936, Manchester, UK.
25. Jean Véronis. 2004. Hyperlex: lexical cartography for information retrieval. Computer Speech & Language, 18(3):223-252.
26. Dominic Widdows and Beate Dorow. 2002. A Graph Model for Unsupervised Lexical Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-02), pages 1093- 1099, Taipei, Taiwan.