Comparison of image quality criteria between digital storage phosphor plate in mammography and full-field digital mammography in the detection of breast cancer

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 52-59

  Pushpa, Thevi Rajendran ^a   Vijayalakshmi, Krishnapillai ^b   Sulaiman, Tamanang ^c   Kanaga, Kumari Chelliah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah   (Malaysia)

^c Women's Cancer Detection and Breast Clinic 66   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Comparative studies; Early detection of cancer; Mammography; Radiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL STORAGE PHOSPHOR PLATE MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84856030025     PISSN: 1394195X     EISSN: 21804303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lim GCC, Halimah Y, editors. Second report of the National Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence in Malaysia 2003 [Internet]. Kuala Lumpur (MY): National Cancer Registry, Malaysia; 2004 [cited 2008 Dec 19]. Available from: http://www.crc.gov.my/documents/report/2nd%20National%20Cancer%20 Registry.pdf.
2. Carola R, Harvey JP, Noback CR. Human anatomy & physiology. 2nd ed. New York (NY); McGraw-Hill: 1992.
3. Radiological protection of patients (RPOP): Mammography (radiography of the breast) [Internet]. Vienna (AT): International Atomic Energy Agency; 2003-2006 [cited 2009 Sep 13]. Available from: https://rpop.iaea.org/rpop/rpop/content/informationfor/healthprofessionals/1_radiology/mammography/mammography-technique.htm
4. What is mammogram? [Internet]. Bostom (MA): Breast Imaging Diagnostic Services, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; 1998 [cited 2011 May 19]. Available from: http://brighamrad.harvard.edu/patients/education/ Mammo/defne.html.
5. Kopans DB. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
6. Muttarak M. Digital mammography: Opportunities and limitations. Singapore Med J [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2009 Feb 20];48(9):795-796. Available from: http://smj.sma.org.sg/4809/4809e1.pdf.
7. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images [Internet]. Brussels (BE): European Comission; 1996 [cited 2010 Mar 24]. Available from: http://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/ fp5-euratom/docs/eur16260.pdf.
8. Vyborny CJ. Image quality and the clinical radiographic examination. RadioGraphics 1997 [cited 2011 May 25];17(2):479-498. Available from: http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/17/2/479.full.pdf+html.
9. Ongeval CV, Van Steen A, Geniets C, Dekeyzer F, Bosmans H, Marchal G. Clinical image quality criteria for full feld digital mammography: A frst practical application. Radiat Prot Dosimetry [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2008 Oct 15];129(1-3):265-270. Available from: http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/129/1-3/265.
10. Food and Drug Administration. Quality mammography standards. Final rule-21 CFR parts 16 and 900. Washington (DC): Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.
11. Kanaga KC, Yap HH, Laila SE, Sulaiman T, Zaharah M, Shantini A. A critical comparison of three full feld digital mammography systems using fgure of merit. Med J Malaysia [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2010 Aug 8];65(2):119-122. Available from: http://www.e-mjm.org/2010/v65n2/Full_Field_Digital_Mammography.pdf.
12. Schueller G, Riedl CC, Mallek R, Eibenberger K, Langenberger H, Kaindl E, et al. Image quality, lesion detection, and dagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: Full-feld digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates. Eur J Radiol [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2008 Sep 18];67(3):487-496. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0720048X07004172.
13. Bassett LW, Farria DM, Bansal S, Farquhar MA, Wilcox PA, Feig SA. Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. Radiology [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2011 Mar 12];215(3):698-702. Available from: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/215/3/698.full.pdf.
14. Bassett LW. Clinical image evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33(6):1027-1039.
15. Bick U, Diekmann F, editors. Medical radiology: Diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology: Digital mammography. Berlin (DE): Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2010.
16. ACR practice guidelines for the performance of screening and diagnostic mammography [Internet]. Philadelphia (PA): American College of Radiology; 2008 [cited 2008 August 28]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality_safety/guidelines/breast/screening_diagnostic.aspx
17. Tamil MA. Calculate your own sample size. Kuala Lumpur (MY): Department of Community Health and Sekretariat of Medical Research and Industry, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre; 2008.
18. Digital vs. flm mammography in the digital mammographic imaging screening trial (DMIST): Questions and Answers [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2005 [cited 2008 Dec 24]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/qa/2005/dmistqandA.
19. Inter-rater agreement (kappa) [Internet]. Mariakerke (BE): MedCalc Software; 2010 [cited 2010 May 6]. Available from: http://www.medcalc.org/manual/kappa.php?gclid=CLW7tsL4oKsCFckg6wodQ2MQfg.
20. Fischman A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Claussen CD, Muller-Schimpfe M. Comparison of full-feld digital mammography and flm-screen mammography: Image quality and lesion detection. Brit J Radiol [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2008 Dec 22];78(928):312-315. Available from: http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/content/full/78/928/312.
21. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekman F, Diekman S, Piguet JC, Young K, et al. Breast lesion detection and classifcation: Comparison of screen-flm mammography with soft-copy reading-Observer performance study. Radiology [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2008 Dec 20];237(1):37-44. Available from: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/237/1/37.full.pdf.
22. Skanne P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-flm and full-feld digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2008 Dec 24];229(3):877-884. Available from: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/229/3/877.full.pdf+html.
23. Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-flm mammography versus full-feld digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program-The Oslo II study. Radioloy [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2008 Nov 20];232(1):197-204. Available from: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/244/3/708.full.
24. Lewin JM, Hendrik RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-feld digital mammography with screen-flm mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examination. Radiology [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2008 Dec 25];218(3):873-880. Available from: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/218/3/873.full.pdf+html.
25. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrik RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, et al. Clinical comparison of full-feld digital mammography and screen-flm mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2010 Jul 22];179(3):671-677. Available from: http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/179/3/671.
26. Ideguchi T, Higashida Y, Kawaji Y, Sasaki M, Zaizen M, Shibiyama R, et al. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: Physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifcations. Radiat Med [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2009 Jan 22];22(4):218-224. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15468941/.
27. Agfa Healthcare. DX-S [Internet]. Greenville (SC): Agfa-Gevaert Group; 2011 [cited 2011 March 23] Available from: http://www.agfa.com/he/usa/ en/internet/main/products_services/computed_ radiography/digitizers/dx_s.jsp.
28. Helvie M. Full feld digital mammography: A new breast cancer screening tool. Cancer News [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2011 May 25]. Available from: http://www.cancernews.com/data/Article/210.asp.
29. Feig SA. Image quality of screening mammography: Effect on clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2011 May 25];178(4):805-807. Available from: http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/178/4/805.