Synoptic surgical reporting for breast cancer surgery: an innovation in knowledge translation

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 199, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 770-775

  Temple, Walley J ^a   Francis, Wesley P ^a   Tamano, Evangeline ^a,b   Dabbs, Kelly ^b   Mack, Lloyd A ^a   Fields, Anthony ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alberta WebSMR; Outcomes; Surgical report; Synoptic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ONLINE SYSTEM; OVARY CANCER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALBERTA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MASTECTOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SURVIVAL RATE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77953683311     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Birkmeyer J.D., Stukel T.A., Siewers A.E., et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2117-2127
2. Rutgers E.J. Guidelines to assure quality in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 31 (2005) 568-576
3. Birkmeyer J.D., Dimick J.B., and Birkmeyer N.J. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?. J Am Coll Surg 198 (2004) 626-632
4. Kingsmore D., Ssemwogerere A., Hole D., et al. Specialisation and breast cancer survival in the screening era. Br J Cancer 88 (2003) 1708-1712
5. Gillis C.R., and Hole D.J. Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ 312 (1996) 145-148
6. Ho V., Heslin M.J., Yun H., et al. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 13 (2006) 851-858
7. Birkmeyer J.D., Siewers A.E., Finlayson E.V., et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 1128-1137
8. Bilimoria K.Y., Phillips J.D., Rock C.E., et al. Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 16 (2009) 1799-1808
9. DeLone W.H., and McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19 (2003) 9
10. Edhemovic I., Temple W.J., de Gara C.J., et al. The computer synoptic operative report-a leap forward in the science of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 11 (2004) 941-947
11. Elit L., Bondy S., Chen Z., et al. The quality of the operative report for women with ovarian cancer in Ontario. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28 (2006) 892-897
12. Harvey A., Zhang H., Nixon J., et al. Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control. Surgery 141 (2007) 708-714
13. Leong A.S. Synoptic/checklist reporting of breast biopsies: has the time come?. Breast J 7 (2001) 271-274
14. Qu Z., Ninan S., Almosa A., et al. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system. Am J Clin Pathol 127 (2007) 898-903
15. McGowan J. Katz on the net. CMAJ 159 (1998) 1494
16. The palpable breast lump: information and recommendations to assist decision-making when a breast lump is detected. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice guidelines for the Care and treatment of breast cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists. CMAJ 158 Suppl 3 (1998) S3-S8
17. Henry S.B., Galzagorry G., Lahey A., et al. A template based approach to support utilization of clinical practice guidelines within an electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5 (1998) 237-244