Pressure Buildup During Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection From a Partially Penetrating Borehole into Gas Reservoirs

Transport in Porous Media

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 889-911

  Mukhopadhyay, Sumit ^a   Yang, Shao Yang ^b   Yeh, Hund Der ^c  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b VANUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytical solution; Carbon dioxide; Gas reservoir; Pressure buildup; Sequestration; Storage; Supercritical

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; GAS RESERVOIR; PRESSURE BUILDUP; SEQUESTRATION; SUPER-CRITICAL;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY STORAGE; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION; WATER INJECTION;

INJECTION (OIL WELLS);

ANALYTICAL METHOD; BOREHOLE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOURIER TRANSFORM; LAPLACE TRANSFORM; NUMERICAL METHOD; SUPERCRITICAL FLOW;

EID: 84855996784     PISSN: 01693913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-011-9879-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Al-Hussainy R., Ramey H. J. Jr., Crawford P. B.: The flow of real gases through porous media. J. Pet. Technol. 239, 624-636 (1966).
2. Altunin V. V.: Thermophysical Properties of Carbon Dioxide. Publishing House of Standards, Moscow Russia (1975) (in Russian).
3. 2 in geological media: Criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Convers. Manage. 41, 953-970 (2000).
4. 2 storage in geological media: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 34(2), 254-273 (2008).
5. 2 storage: capacity and regulatory implications. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3(6), 745-756 (2009).
6. Dentz M., Tartakovsky D. M.: Abrupt-interface solution for carbon dioxide injection into porous media. Transp. Porous Med. 79, 15-27 (2009).
7. Dougherty D. E., Babu D. K.: Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double porosity reservoir. Water Resour. Res. 20, 1116-1122 (1984).
8. 2 sequestration in exploited gas fields. Energy Convers. Manage. 51(10), 1918-1928 (2010). doi: 10. 1016/j. enconman. 2010. 02. 024.
9. 2: what do we know, where are the gaps, and what more needs to be done?. Energy 29(9-10), 1329-1338 (2004).
10. García, J. E.: Fluid dynamics of carbon dioxide disposal into saline aquifers. PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, December (2003).
11. 2 disposal in aquifers within the Alberta sedimentary basin, Canada. Energy Convers. Manage. 37(6-8), 1135-1142 (1996).
12. Hepple R. P., Benson S. M.: Geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy: Performance requirements and the implications of surface seepage. Environ. Geol. 47, 576-585 (2005).
13. Hildebrand F. B.: Advanced Calculus for Applications, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1976).
14. Holloway S.: Underground sequestration of carbon dioxide-a viable greenhouse gas mitigation option. Energy 30, 2318-2333 (2005).
15. Hyder Z., Butler J. J. Jr, McElwee C. D., Liu W.: Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 20(8), 1116-1122 (1994).
16. IPCC (Intergovernmentalpanelon Climate Change): IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005).
17. Leibenzon L. S.: Gas movement in a porous medium. Neft. i. Slants. Khoz. 10, 497-519 (1929) (in Russian).
18. 2 injection in brine aquifers. Transp. Porous Med. 79, 265-284 (2009a).
19. 2 sequestration based on pressure buildup. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3, 577-585 (2009b).
20. 2 injection into a closed brine aquifer. Transp. Porous Med. doi: 10. 1007/s11242-011-9776-z (2011).
21. Muskat M.: The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids. J. E. Edwards Inc., Ann Arbor, MI (1946).
22. 2 plume evolution during injection. Transp. Porous Med. 58, 339-360 (2005).
23. 2 transport in depleted gas reservoirs. In: Ho, C. K., Webb, S. W. (eds) Gas Transport in Porous Media, pp. 419-426. Springer, London, UK (2006).
24. 2 injection into natural gas reservoirs. Energy Convers. Manage. 48, 1808-1815 (2007).
25. 2 in porous media with residual gas, LBNL-4115E. Transp. Porous Med. (2010) doi: 10. 1007/s11242-010-9645-1
26. 2 injection in deep saline aquifers. Energy Proc. 4, 4140-4147 (2011). doi: 10. 1016/j. egypro. 2011. 02. 358.
27. 2. Report LBNL-57952. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley (2005).
28. Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C., Moridis, G.: TOUGH2 User's Guide, Version 2. 0. Report LBNL-43134. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley (1999).
29. 2 for geological sequestration. Energy Convers. Manage. 43(2), 185-198 (2002).
30. Smith J. M., van Ness H. C.: Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, 3 edn (9 th printing). International Student Edition, McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India (1981).
31. Tartakovsky D. M.: Real gas flow through heterogeneous porous media: theoretical aspects of upscaling. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 14, 109-122 (2000).
32. 2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4(6), 910-919 (2010).
33. 2 storage in deep saline aquifers. Transp. Porous Med. doi: 10. 1007/s11242-010-9582-z (2010b).
34. Yang S.-Y., Yeh H.-D., Chiu P. Y.: A closed form solution for constant flux pumping in a well under partial penetration condition. Water Resour. Res. 42, W05502 (2006). doi: 10. 1029/2004WR003889.
35. Yeh H.-D., Yang S.-Y., Peng H. Y.: A new closed-form solution for a radial two-layer drawdown equation for groundwater under constant flux pumping in a finite-radius well. Adv. Water Resour. 26(7), 747-757 (2003).
36. Yeh H.-D., Chen Y.-J., Yang S.-Y.: Semi-analytical solution for a slug test in partially penetrating wells including the effect of finite-thickness skin. Hydrol. Process. 22, 3741-3748 (2008).
37. Zeidouni M., Pooladi-Darvish M., Keith D. W.: Analytical models for determining pressure change in an overlying aquifer due to leakage. Energy Proc. 4, 3833-3840 (2011). doi: 10. 1016/j. egypro. 2011. 02. 319.
38. Zhou Q., Birkholzer J., Tsang C.-F.: A semi-analytical solution for large-scale injectioninduced pressure perturbation and leakage in a laterally bounded aquifer-aquitard system. Transp. Porous Med. 78(1), 127-148 (2009).
39. 2. Greenh. Gas Sci. Technol. 1, 11-20 (2011). doi: 10. 1002/ghg3.