A closed form solution for constant flux pumping in a well under partial penetration condition

Water Resources Research

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Yang, Shaw Yang ^a   Yeh, Hund Der ^b   Chiu, Pin Yuan ^b  

^a VANUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COSINE TRANSFORMS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; MASS TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

AQUIFER THICKNESS; FINITE FOURIER COSINE TRANSFORMS; RADIAL CONFINED AQUIFER SYSTEM; TEST WELL;

WATER RESOURCES;

AQUIFERS; COSINE TRANSFORMS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; MASS TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WATER RESOURCES;

GROUNDWATER FLOW; LAPLACE TRANSFORM; PENETRATION TEST; PUMPING; UNCONFINED AQUIFER; WELL TESTING; WELL WATER;

EID: 33745445004     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003889     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cassiani, G., and Z. J. Kabala (1998), Hydraulics of a partially penetrating well: Solution to a mixed-type boundary value problem via dual integral equations, J. Hydrol., 211, 100-111.
2. Charbeneau, R. J. (2000), Groundwater Hydraulic and Pollutant Transport, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
3. Crump, K. S. (1976), Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms using a Fourier series approximation, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 23(1), 89-96.
4. de Hoog, F. R., J. H. Knight, and A. N. Stokes (1982), An improved method for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 5(3), 357-366.
5. Hantush, M. S. (1962), Aquifer tests on partially penetrating wells, Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 127, 284-308.
6. Hantush, M. S. (1964), Hydraulics of wells, Adv. Hydrosd., 1, 281-432.
7. Hildebrand, F. B. (1976), Advanced Calculus for Applications, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
8. Kreyszig, E. (1993), Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 7th Ed., John Wiley, Hoboken, N. J.
9. Neuman, S. P. (1974), Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response, Water Resour. Res., 10(2), 303-312.
10. Ruud, N. C., and Z. J. Kabala (1997), Response of a partially penetrating well in a heterogeneous aquifer: Integrated well face flux vs. uniform well face flux boundary conditions, J. Hydrol., 194, 76-94.
11. Shanks, D. (1955), Non-linear transformations of divergent and slowly convergent sequences, J. Math. Phys., 34, 1-42.
12. Stehfest, H. (1970), Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, Commun. ACM, 13(1), 47-49.
13. Sternberg, Y. M. (1973), Efficiency of partially penetrating wells, Ground Water, 11(3), 5-8.
14. Strelsova-Adams, T. D. (1979), Pressure drawdown in a well with limited flow entry, J. Pet. Technol., 31, 1469-1476.
15. Talbot, A. (1979), The accurate numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, J. Inst. Math. Its Appl., 23, 97-120.
16. Theis, C. V. (1935), The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage, Eos Trans. AGU, 16, 519-524.
17. Visual Numerics (1997), IMSL Stat/Library, volume 2, software, Houston, Tex.
18. Yeh, H. D., S. Y. Yang, and H. Y. Peng (2003), A new closed-form solution for a radial two-layer drawdown equation for groundwater under constant flux pumping in a finite-radius well, Adv. Water Resour., 26(1), 747-757.