Software process improvement success factors for small and medium Web companies: A qualitative study

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 1970, Pages 479-500

  Sulayman, Muhammad ^a   Urquhart, Cathy ^b   Mendes, Emilia ^c   Seidel, Stefan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c ZAYED UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LIECHTENSTEIN   (Liechtenstein)

Author keywords

Grounded theory; Small and medium Web companies; Software process improvement; Success factors

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); PROCESS ENGINEERING;

GROUNDED THEORY; PRIMARY OBJECTIVE; QUALITATIVE STUDY; SEMI-STRUCTURED; SMALL AND MEDIUM WEB COMPANIES; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS; SUCCESS FACTORS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84855992867     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Glass, R., Software Creativity. 1994, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
2. L. Harjumaa, I. Tervonen, P. Vuorio, Improving software inspection process with patterns, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Quality Software, 2004 (QSIC 2004), 2004, pp. 118–125.
3. M. Lepasaar, T. Makinen, Integrating software process assessment models using a process meta model, in: International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC), IEEE, vol. 221, 2002, pp. 224–229.
4. Cugola, G., Ghezzi, C., Software processes: a retrospective and a path to the future. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 4 (1998), 101–123.
5. Thomson, H.E., Mayhew, P., Approaches to software process improvement. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 3 (1997), 3–17.
6. Zahran, S., Software Process Improvement: Practical Guidelines for Business Success. 1998, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
7. Florac, W., Park, R., Carleton, A., Practical Software Measurement: Measuring for Process Management and Improvement. 1997, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
8. Abrahamsson, P., Rethinking the concept of commitment in software process improvement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 13 (2001), 69–98.
9. van Solingen, R., Measuring the ROI of software process improvement. Software, IEEE 21 (2004), 32–38.
10. Kuilboer, J.P., Ashrafi, N., Software process and product improvement: an empirical assessment. Information and Software Technology 42 (2000), 27–34.
11. Tortorella, M., Visaggio, G., Empirical investigation of innovation diffusion in a software process. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 9 (1999), 595–621.
12. Niazi, M., Wilson, D., Zowghi, D., Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: an empirical study. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 11 (2006), 193–211.
13. Dyba, T., An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 (2005), 410–424.
14. Wilson, D., Hall, T., Baddoo, N., A framework for evaluation and prediction of software process improvement success. Journal of Systems and Software 59 (2001), 135–142.
15. S. Alexandre, A. Renault, N. Habra, OWPL: a gradual approach for software process improvement in SMEs, in: 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2006 (SEAA ’06), 2006, pp. 328–335.
16. Fayad, M., Laitinen, M., Ward, R., Thinking objectively: software engineering in the small. Communications of the ACM, 43, 2000, 118.
17. P. Allen, M. Ramachandran, H. Abushama, PRISMS: An Approach to Software Process Improvement for Small to Medium Enterprises, 2003.
18. Mendes, E., Mosley, N., Web Engineering. 2006, Springer-Verlag, New York Inc.
19. SEI, Improving Processes in Small Settings (IPSS Project), 2006. < http://www.sei.cmu.edu/iprc/ipssbackground.html>.
20. ISO, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 Working Group 24, 2007. < http://www.iso-iec-sc7wg24.gelog.etsmtl.ca/Webpage/iso-iec-sc7wg24_english.html>.
21. G. Santos, M. Montoni, J. Vasconcellos, S. Figueiredo, R. Cabral, C. Cerdeiral, A.E. Katsurayama, P. Lupo, D. Zanetti, A.R. Rocha, Implementing software process improvement initiatives in small and medium-size enterprises in Brazil, in: 6th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, 2007 (QUATIC 2007), 2007, pp. 187–198.
22. T. Grechenig, W. Zuser, Creating Organic Software Maturity Attitudes (COSMA) Selected Principles and Activities for Software Maturity in Small and Medium Software Enterprises, 2004.
23. AIA, Aerospace Industries Association, 2010. < http://www.aia-aerospace.org/stats/aero_stats/stat08.pdf>.
24. Taylor, M., McWilliam, J., Forsyth, H., Wade, S., Methodologies and website development: a survey of practice. Information and Software Technology 44 (2002), 381–391.
25. Fraternali, P., Paolini, P., Model-driven development of Web applications: the AutoWeb system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 18, 2000, 382.
26. E. Union, The New SME Definition, 2005. < http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/sme-definition/index_en.htm>.
27. Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., Rout, T., Process improvement for small firms: an evaluation of the RAPID assessment-based method. Information and Software Technology 48 (2006), 323–334.
28. T. Dyba, Factors of Software Process Improvement Success in Small and Large Organizations: An Empirical Study in the Scandinavian Context, ACM, 2003, pp. 148–157.
29. Habra, N., Alexandre, S., Desharnais, J.-M., Laporte, C.Y., Renault, A., Initiating software process improvement in very small enterprises: experience with a light assessment tool. Information and Software Technology 50 (2008), 763–771.
30. Pino, F.J., Pedreira, O., García, F., Luaces, M.R., Piattini, M., Using Scrum to guide the execution of software process improvement in small organizations. Journal of Systems and Software 83 (2010), 1662–1677.
31. S. Christodoulou, P. Zafiris, T. Papatheodorou, WWW2000: The Developer's View and a Practitioner's Approach to Web Engineering, 2000, pp. 75–92.
32. M. Sulayman, E. Mendes, Quantitative assessments of key success factors in software process improvement for small and medium web companies, in: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, ACM, Sierre, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 2319–2323.
33. Sulayman, M., Mendes, E., A systematic literature review of software process improvement in small and medium web companies. Advances in Software Engineering, Springer CCIS 59 (2009), 1–8.
34. Deshpande, Y., Hansen, S., Web engineering: creating a discipline among disciplines. Multimedia, IEEE 8 (2001), 82–87.
35. Deshpande, Y., Hansen, S., Web engineering: creating a discipline among disciplines. IEEE Multimedia 8 (2001), 82–87.
36. A. McDonald, R. Welland, Agile Web Engineering (AWE) Process, Department of Computing Science Technical Report TR-2001-98, University of Glasgow, Scotland, 2 December, 2001.
37. A. McDonald, R. Welland, Agile web engineering (AWE) process: multidisciplinary stakeholders and team communication, in: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Web engineering, Springer-Verlag, Oviedo, Spain, 2003, pp. 515–518.
38. McDonald, A., Welland, R., Agile Web engineering (AWE) process: perceptions within a fortune 500 financial services company. Journal of Web Engineering, 4, 2005, 283.
39. S. Vasudevan, D. Wilemon, Rapid application development: major issues and lessons learned, in: Innovation in Technology Management – The Key to Global Leadership, PICMET ‘97: Portland International Conference on Management and Technology, 1997, pp. 484–492.
40. Rising, L., Janoff, N.S., The Scrum software development process for small teams. Software, IEEE 17 (2000), 26–32.
41. Nayoung, H., Customization of Scrum methodology for outsourced E-commerce projects. Junbeom, Y., Sungdeok, C., (eds.) Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2010, IEEE, Sydney, Australia, 310–315.
42. H. Helms, J. Quarto-vonTivadar, Discovering Fusebox 3 with Coldfusion, Techspedition, 2002.
43. Lowe, D., Eklund, J., Client needs and the design process in web projects. Journal of Web Engineering 1 (2002), 23–36.
44. Wallace, D., Raggett, I., Aufgang, J., Extreme Programming for Web Projects. 2003, Addison-Wesley Professional.
45. Burdman, J.R., Collaborative Web Development: Strategies and Best Practices for Web Teams. 1999, Addison-Wesley.
46. R. Ahmad, Z. Li, F. Azam, Web engineering: a new emerging discipline, in: IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies, IEEE, 2005, pp. 445–450.
47. Ginige, A., Murugesan, S., Web engineering: an introduction. IEEE Multimedia 8 (2001), 14–18.
48. Pressman, R., Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. sixth ed., 2006, McGraw Hill.
49. Y. Deshpande, M. Gaedke, Web Engineering: Developing Successful Web Applications in a Systematic Way, 2005, pp. 10–14.
50. Schwabe, D., Rossi, G., An object oriented approach to Web-based applications design. Theory and Practice of Object Systems 4 (1998), 207–225.
51. G. Griffiths, B.D. Hebbron, M.A. Lockyer, B.J. Oates, A simple method and tool for web engineering, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, ACM, Ischia, Italy, 2002, pp. 755–762.
52. A.F.P. de Carvalho, J.C.A. Silva, Extending UWE to improve Web navigation project – a case study, in: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 2603, 2005, pp. 2608–2613.
53. G. ObjectManagement, UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification, 2005.
54. Gómez, J., Cachero, C., OO-H method: extending UML to model web interfaces. Information Modeling for Internet Applications, 2003, 144–173.
55. M. Lockyer, G. Griffiths, B. Hebbron, B. Oates, A teaching method and tool for Web engineering, in: International Conference on Learning Advanced Technologies, IEEE, 2003, pp. 284–285.
56. D. Bolchini, J. Mylopoulos, From task-oriented to goal-oriented Web requirements analysis, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, 2003 (WISE 2003), 2003, pp. 166–175.
57. Jose Escalona, M., Aragon, G., NDT. A model-driven approach for web requirements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 34 (2008), 377–390.
58. Griffiths, G., CASE in the third generation. Software Engineering Journal 9 (1994), 159–166.
59. Jones, A., Birtle, M., An individual assessment technique for group projects in software engineering’. Software Engineering Journal 4 (1989), 226–232.
60. H. Nguyen, Web application testing beyond tactics, in: Sixth International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, IEEE, 2004, pp. 83–90.
61. J. Preciado, M. Linaje, S. Comai, F. Sanchez-Figueroa, Designing rich internet applications with web engineering methodologies, in: 9th IEEE International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, WSE 2007, 2006, pp. 23–30.
62. Pasha, Pakistan Software Houses Association (P@SHA), 2010. < http://www.pasha.org.pk/>.
63. Pseb, Pakistan Software Export Board (PSEB), 2010. < http://www.pseb.org.pk/>.
64. C.E. Lunneborg, Convenience Sample, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online, 2007. < http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode>.
65. D.R. Goldenson, After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, Its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success, in: DTIC Document, 1995.
66. El-Emam, K., Goldenson, D., McCurley, J., Herbsleb, J., Modelling the likelihood of software process improvement: an exploratory study. Empirical Software Engineering 6 (2001), 207–229.
67. Rainer, A., Hall, T., Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis. Journal of Systems and Software 62 (2002), 71–84.
68. Niazi, M., Babar, M.A., Katugampola, N.M., Demotivators of software process improvement: an empirical investigation. Software Process 13 (2008), 249–264.
69. B. McFeeley, IDEALSM: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement, Handbook, CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
70. Nikitina, N., Kajko-Mattsson, M., Impact of growing business on software processes. Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, 2010, 189–200.
71. Montoni, M., Rocha, A., A methodology for identifying critical success factors that influence software process improvement initiatives: an application in the Brazilian software industry. Software Process Improvement, 2007, 175–186.
72. Pino, F.J., García, F., Piattini, M., Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review. Software Quality Journal 16 (2008), 237–261.
73. S.U. Khan, M. Niazi, R. Ahmad, in: Critical Success Factors for Offshore Software Development Outsourcing Vendors: A Systematic Literature Review, IEEE, 2009, pp. 207–216.
74. M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis, C.V. Weber, Capability maturity model, version 1.1, Software, IEEE 10 (1993) 18–27.
75. Coleman, G., O'Connor, R., Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: a study of Irish software product companies. Information and Software Technology 49 (2007), 654–667.
76. A.E. Sheikh, H. Tarawneh, A survey of web engineering practice in small Jordanian web development firms, in: Proceedings of the 6th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ACM, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007, pp. 481–490.
77. Z. Habib, The Critical Success Factors in Implementation of Software Process Improvement Efforts: CSFs, Motivators & Obstacles, Rapport Nr.: Report/Department of Applied Information Technology 2009: 056, 2009.
78. M. Sulayman, E. Mendes, An extended systematic literature review of software process improvement in small and medium web companies, in: Empirical Assessments in Software Engineering (EASE 2011), BCS, Durham, UK, 2011.
79. B. Day, S.C. Ke-Zun, L. Lovelock, C. Lutteroth, Climbing the Ladder: CMMI Level 3, Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 13, Taylor & Francis, 2010.
80. H. Altarawneh, A.E. Shiekh, A theoretical agile process framework for web applications development in small software firms, in: Proceedings of the 2008 Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 125–132.
81. F.J. Pino, J.A.H. Alegría, J.C. Vidal, F. García, M. Piattini, A Process for Driving Process Improvement in VSEs, Vancouver, BC, 2009, pp. 342–353.
82. R. Naidu, Software Process Improvement of Small and Medium Organizations, Computer Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2003.
83. P. Allen, M. Ramachandran, H. Abushama, PRISMS: an approach to software process improvement for small to medium enterprises, in: H. Lin, H.D. Ehrich (Eds.) Proceedings. Third International Conference on Quality Software. Dallas, TX, 2003.
84. L. Scott, R. Jeffery, L. Carvalho, J. D'Ambra, P. Rutherford, Practical software process improvement – the IMPACT project, in: D.D. Grant, L. Sterling (Eds.) Proceedings 2001 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Canberra, ACT, Australia. Instn. Eng., Australia (IEAust). Software Eng. Rea. Consultative Council (SERCC) of the Australian Comput. Soc. (ACS), 27–28 August, 2001.
85. E. Mendes, N. Mosley, S. Counsell, A replicated assessment of the use of adaptation rules to improve Web cost estimation, in: ISESE ’03, 2003.
86. Dyba, T., An instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement. Empirical Software Engineering 5 (2000), 357–390.
87. Seaman, C.B., Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25 (1999), 557–572.
88. Galliers, R., Markus, M.L., Exploring Information Systems Research Approaches: Readings and Reflections. 2006, Routledge.
89. Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., Information Systems and Qualitative Research. 1997, Chapman & Hall, Ltd.
90. Pace, S., A grounded theory of the flow experiences of Web users. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 60 (2004), 327–363.
91. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2009, Sage Publications, Inc.
92. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, AldineTransaction.
93. Runeson, P., Höst, M., Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 14 (2009), 131–164.
94. Urquhart, C., An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, 2001, 104–140.
95. Urquhart, C., Strategies for conversation and systems analysis in requirements gathering: a qualitative view of analyst–client communication. The Qualitative Report 4 (2000), 1–12.
96. C. Urquhart, Exploring Analyst–Client Communication: Using Grounded Theory Techniques to Investigate Interaction in Informal Requirements Gathering, Information Systems and Qualitative Research. Chapman and Hall, London, 1997, pp. 149–181.
97. Orlikowski, W.J., CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 309–340.
98. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1990, Sage.
99. Glaser, B.G., Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing. 1992, Sociology Press.
100. Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., Myers, M.D., Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal 20 (2010), 357–381.
101. Pauleen, D.J., An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (2003), 227–256.
102. Webb, B., Mallon, B., A method to bridge the gap between breadth and depth in IS narrative analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 2007, 24.
103. Strong, D., Volkoff, O., Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact. Management Information Systems Quarterly 34 (2010), 731–756.
104. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.L., Basics of Qualitative Research. 2008, Sage Publications, Inc.
105. A. Cater-Steel, Low-Rigour, Rapid Software Process Assessments for Small Software Development Firms, 2004, pp. 368–377.
106. Glaser, B.G., Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. 1978, Sociology Press.
107. Charmaz, K., Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. 2006, Sage Publications Ltd.
108. Glaser, B.G., Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. 1998, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
109. Glaser, B.G., The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. 2001, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, USA.
110. Glaser, B.G., The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. 2005, Sociology Press.
111. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 1998, Sage Publications, Inc.
112. Pino, F., García, F., Piattini, M., Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review. Software Quality Journal 16 (2008), 237–261.
113. Guerrero, F., Eterovic, Y., Adopting the SW-CMM in a Small IT Organization. Software, IEEE 21 (2004), 29–35.
114. Maxwell, J.A., Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 2005, Sage Publications, Inc.
115. Walsham, G., Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (1995), 74–81.