Effect of nurse case management compared with usual care on controlling cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

Diabetes Care

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1689-1694

  Ishani, Areef ^a,b   Greer, Nancy ^a   Taylor, Brent C ^a,b   Kubes, Laurie ^a   Cole, Paula ^a   Atwood, Melissa ^a   Clothier, Barbara ^a   Ercan Fang, Nacide ^a,b  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE CONTROL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSE MANAGER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; THERAPY EFFECT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CASE MANAGEMENT; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84855983764     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: 19355548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-2121     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cheung BMY, Ong KL, Cherny SS, Sham P-C, Tso AWK, Lam KSL. Diabetes prevalence and therapeutic target achievement in the United States, 1999 to 2006. Am J Med 2009;122:443-453
2. Tsai AC, Morton SC, Mangione CM, Keeler EB. A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:478-488 (Pubitemid 41208929)
3. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, et al.; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003;21:821-848 (Pubitemid 36677141)
4. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al.; DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 2001;344:3-10 (Pubitemid 32064838)
5. Krein SL, Klamerus ML, Vijan S, et al. Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial. Am J Med 2004;116:732-739 (Pubitemid 38622309)
6. Thompson DM, Kozak SE, Sheps S. Insulin adjustment by a diabetes nurse educator improves glucose control in insulin-requiring diabetic patients: a randomized trial. CMAJ 1999;161:959-962 (Pubitemid 29495491)
7. Aubert RE, Herman WH, Waters J, et al. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998;129: 605-612 (Pubitemid 28480815)
8. Whittemore R, Melkus GDE, Sullivan A, Grey M. A nurse-coaching intervention for women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2004;30:795-804 (Pubitemid 39421900)
9. Weinberger M, Kirkman MS, Samsa GP, et al. A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: impact on glycemic control and health-related quality of life. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10: 59-66
10. Choe HM, Mitrovich S, Dubay D, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Vijan S. Proactive case management of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by a clinical pharmacist: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:253-260 (Pubitemid 40569748)
11. Taylor KI, Oberle KM, Crutcher RA, Norton PG. Promoting health in type 2 diabetes: nurse-physician collaboration in primary care. Biol Res Nurs 2005;6: 207-215 (Pubitemid 43920966)
12. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153:507-515
13. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hickson Hohne S, Hu TM, Levine BA, Conlin PR. Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1624-1629 (Pubitemid 40923075)
14. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, et al. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006;296:427-440 (Pubitemid 44127527)
15. Stone RA, Rao RH, Sevick MA, et al. Active care management supported by home telemonitoring in veterans with type 2 diabetes: the DiaTel randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2010;33:478-484
16. Sochalski J, Jaarsma T, Krumholz HM, et al. What works in chronic care management: the case of heart failure. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:179-189
17. Carter BL, Rogers M, Daly J, Zheng S, James PA. The potency of team-based care interventions for hypertension: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1748-1755
18. Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135:825-834 (Pubitemid 33051266)
19. Gabbay RA, Lendel I, Saleem TM, et al. Nurse case management improves blood pressure, emotional distress and diabetes complication screening. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006;71:28-35 (Pubitemid 41821140)
20. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Teresi JA, et al.; IDEATel Consortium. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year results of the IDEATel study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:446-456