527 committees and the political party network

American Politics Research

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 60-84

  Skinner, Richard M ^a   Masket, Seth E ^b   Dulio, David A ^c  

^a NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^c OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

527s; campaign finance; campaigns; parties; political networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855975698     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X11420420     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aldrich J. H.Why parties?. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995:.
2. Anderson B. S.,Carter B.,Carley K.The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices.Social Networks. 1999;21:239-267.
3. Bedlington A.,Malbin M. J.Life after reform: When the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act meets politics. Malbin M. J., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2003:121-137.
4. BernsteinJ. (1999). The expanded party in American politics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
5. Bernstein J.In pursuit of the White House 2000. Mayer W. G., ed. New York, NY: Chatham House; 2000:145-178.
6. BernsteinJ. (2004). The rise and fall of Howard dean and other notes on the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination. Forum, 2, Article 1. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.102910.2202/1540-8884.1029. Retrieved from http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol2/iss1/art1.
7. Bernstein J.,Dominguez C. B. K.Candidates and candidacies in the expanded party.PS: Political Science and Politics. 2003;36:165-169.
8. Bimes T.,Dominguez C. B. K. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2004Chicago, IL; 2004.
9. Bonacich P.Power and centrality: A family of measures.American Journal of Sociology. 1987;92:1170-1182.
10. Bonacich P.,Oliver A.,Snijders T. A. B.Controlling for size in centrality scores.Social Networks. 1998;20:135-141.
11. Broder D. S.The Party's over: The failure of politics in America. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1972:.
12. Burt R. S.The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field. Guillén M. F., ed. NY: Russell Sage; 2002:148-90.
13. Cohen M.,Karol D.,Noel H.,Zaller J. R.The party decides: Presidential nominations before and after reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2008:.
14. Corrado AnthonyThe Election After Reform: Money, Politics, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Malbin Michael J., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2006:19-37.
15. Crotty W. J.American parties in decline. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1984:.
16. Doherty J. W.The strength of campaign ties: Political networks as political parties, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association; 2003 Philadelphia, PA; 2003.
17. Doherty J. W.,Organized by competition: Candidateconsultant networks inCalifornia legislative campaigns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2005Washington, DC; 2005.
18. DohertyJ. W. (2006). The consultant-candidate network in California legislative campaigns: A social network analysis of informal party organizations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
19. Dominguez C. B. K.,Not all primaries are created equal. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association; 2003Chicago, IL; 2003.
20. DominguezC. B. K. (2005a). Before the primary: Party elite involvement in congressional nominations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
21. Dulio D. A.,Kolodny R.Political parties and political consultants: Creating alliances for electoral success Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association; 2001Las Vegas, NV; 2001.
22. Dwyer D.New directions in American political parties. Stonecash J. M., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:63-90.
23. Freeman J.The political culture of the Democratic and Republican parties.Political Science Quarterly. 1986;101:327-356.
24. Faust K.Comparing social networks: Size, density, and local structure.Metodološkizvezki. 2006;3:185-216.
25. Faust K.,Skvoretz J.Comparing networks across space and time, size and species.Sociological Methodology. 2002;32:267-299.
26. Gibson R.,Römmele A.A party-centered theory of professionalized campaigning.Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2001;6:31-43.
27. Girvan M.,Newman M. E. J.Community structure in social and biological networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 2002;99:7821-7826.
28. Harmel R.,Janda K.An integrated theory of party goals and party change.Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1994;6:259-287.
29. Herrnson P. S.Party campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1988:.
30. Herrnson P. S.The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections.Journal of Politics. 2009;71:1207-1224.
31. HannemanR. A.RiddleM. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California-Riverside. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.
32. Heberlig E. S.,Larson B. A.Party fundraising, descriptive representation, and the battle for majority control: Shifting leadership appointment strategies in the U.S. House, 1990-2002.Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88:404-421.
33. Heberlig E. S.,Larson B. A.Redistributing campaign contributions by members of congress: The spiraling costs of the permanent campaign.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2005;30:597-624.
34. Klinkner P.The losing parties: Out-party national committees, 1956-1993. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1995:.
35. Kolodny R.Pursuing majorities: Congressional campaign committees in American politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1998:.
36. Kolodny R.,Dulio D. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association; 2001Chicago, IL; 2001.
37. Kolodny R.,Dulio D.Political party adaptation in U.S. congressional campaigns: Why political parties use coordinated expenditures to hire political consultants.Party Politics. 2003;9:729-746.
38. Kolodny R.,Logan A.Political consultants and the extension of party goals.PS: Political Science and Politics. 1998;31:155-159.
39. Latapy M.,Magnie C.,Del Vecchio N.Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks.Social Networks. 2008;30 (1): 31-48.
40. Masket S. E.No middle ground: How informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2009:.
41. Masket S. E.,Heaney M. T.,Miller J. M.,Strolovitch D. Z. S., Networking the parties: A comparative study of Democratic and Republican national convention delegates in 2008 Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association; 2009Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2009.
42. NyhanB. (2009). Strategic outrage: The politics of presidential scandal (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
43. Patterson T. E.Out of order. New York, NY: Vintage; 1994:.
44. Podolny J. M.Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005:.
45. Porter M. A.,Onnela J.,Mucha P. J.Communities in networks.Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 2009;56:1082-1097.
46. Schlesinger J. A.The new American political party.American Political Science Review. 1985;79:1152-1169.
47. Schrager A.,Witwer R.The blueprint: How Democrats won the West (and why Republicans should care). Golden, CO: Fulcrum; 2010:.
48. Schwartz M. A.The party network: The robust organization of Illinois Republicans. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press; 1990:.
49. Shafer B. E.Republicans and Democrats as social types; Or notes toward an ethnography of the political parties.Journal of American Studies. 1986;20:341-354.
50. Skinner R. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association; 2004New Orleans, LA; 2004.
51. Skinner R.Do 527's add up to a party? Thinking about the shadows of politics Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association; 2005Chicago, IL; 2005.
52. Skinner R.More than money: Interest group action in congressional elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2007:.
53. Snijders T. A. B.The degree variance: An index of graph heterogeneity.Social Networks. 1981;3:163-174.
54. Snijders T. A. B.,Baerveldt C.A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution.Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 2003;27:123-151.
55. Ware A.The American direct primary. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
56. Wattenberg M. P.The decline of American political parties, 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998:.
57. Weissman S.,Hassan R.The election after reform: Money, politics and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Malbin M., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006:.