Biomedical systems research-New perspectives opened by quantitative medical imaging

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-9

  Linninger, Andreas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical engineering; Image based computational fluid mechanics; Parameter estimation in distributed systems; Pharmacokinetics; Quantitative medical imaging

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING METHODS; HUMAN BODIES; IMAGE-BASED; IMAGING MODALITY; IN-VIVO; IN-VIVO MEASUREMENT; LIVING ANIMALS; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; MEDICAL THERAPY; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE INVESTIGATION; RESEARCH RESULTS; SPATIO-TEMPORAL; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING METHODS; TRANSPORT PHENOMENA;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRUG THERAPY; DYNAMICS; FLUID MECHANICS; FLUIDS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHARMACOKINETICS; RESEARCH;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84855974129     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ADINA. (2010). Available from: http://www.adina.com/.
2. AnalyzeDirect. (2010). Available from: http://www.analyzedirect.com/.
3. ANSYS. (2011). ANSYS FLUENT; Available from: http://www.ansys.com/.
4. Bailey J.E. Reflections on the scope and the future of metabolic engineering and its connections to functional genomics and drug discovery. Metabolic Engineering 2001, 3:111-114.
5. Biegler L.T., Grossmann I.E. Retrospective on optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2004, 28:1169-1192.
6. Bogle I., Allen D.L., Sumner R. The role of computer aided process engineering in physiology and clinical medicine. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2009, 34:763-769.
7. CD-adapco. (2010). STAR-CD. Available from: http://www.cd-adapco.com/products/STAR-CD/index.htm.
8. COMSOL. (2011). COMSOL Multiphysics. Available from: http://www.comsol.com/.
9. Doyle F.J., Stelling J. Systems interface biology. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006, 3:603-616.
10. Dua P., Pistikopoulos E.N. Modelling and control of drug delivery systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2005, 29:2290-2296.
11. Elmer. (2011). CSC-IT Center for Science. Available from: http://www.csc.fi/elmer/.
12. Gambit Fluent Inc. (2006). Available from: http://www.fluent.com/.
13. gPROMS. (2010). Available from: http://www.psenterprise.com/gproms/index.html.
14. Hedengren J.D., Edgar T.F. In situ adaptive tabulation for real-time control. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2005, 44:2716-2724.
15. Ibanez L., Schroeder W., Ng L., Cates J., The ITK Software guide: The insight segmentation and registration toolkit (for version 2.4 ed.) 2003, Kitware Inc.
16. Kulkarni K., Larsen P., Linninger A.A. Assessing chronic liver toxicity based on relative gene expression data. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2008, 254:308-318.
17. Linninger A. Laboratory for Product and Process Design 2011, UIC, http://vienna.bioengr.uic.edu.
18. Lucia A., Feng Y. Multivariable terrain methods. AIChE Journal 2003, 49:2553-2563.
19. Lucia A., Gattupalli R.R., Kulkarni K., Linninger A. A Barrier-Terrain methodology for global optimization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47:2666-2680.
20. Materialise Inc. (2011). Mimics. Available from: http://www.materialise.be/mimics/main_ENG.html.
21. Moon J., Linninger A.A. A hybrid sequential niche algorithm for optimal engineering design with solution multiplicity. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2009, 33:1261-1271.
22. Neeves K.B., Sawyer A.J., Foley C.P., Saltzman W.M., Olbricht W.L. Dilation and degradation of the brain extracellular matrix enhances penetration of infused polymer nanoparticles. Brain Research 2007, 1180:121-132.
23. OpenFOAM. (2011). FOAM CFD. Available from: http://www.openfoam.org/.
24. Pope S.B. Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation. Combustion Theory and Modelling 1997, 1:41-63.
25. Preisig H.A. Finite automata from first-principle models: Computation of min and max transition times. International Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes 2006, 771-776.
26. Rasband, W.S. (2011). ImageJ. Bethesda, MD, USA. Available from: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
27. Saltzman W.M., Olbricht W.L. Building drug delivery into tissue engineering. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2002, 1:177-186.
28. Sampson J.H., Archer G., Pedain C.E.W.-S., Westphal M., Kunwar S., Vogelbaum M.A., et al. Poor drug distribution as a possible explanation for the results of the PRECISE trial. Journal of Neurosurgery 2010, 113:301-309.
29. Schroeder W., Martin K., Lorensen B. The visualization toolkit: An object-oriented approach to 3-D graphics 2006, Kitware. 4th ed.
30. Somayaji, M.B. (2008). Drug transport mechanism in the human brain. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Univeristy of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
31. Somayaji M.R., Xenos M., Zhang L., Mekarski M., Linninger A.A. Systematic design of drug delivery therapies. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2008, 32:89-98.
32. Stephanopoulos N., Solis E.O.P., Stephanopoulos G. Nanoscale process systems engineering: Toward molecular factories, synthetic cells, and adaptive devices. AIChE Journal 2005, 51:1858-1869.
33. Sweetman B., Xenos M., Zitella L., Linninger A.A. Three-dimensional computational prediction of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human brain. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2011, 41:67-75.
34. Tofts P. Quantitative MRI of the brain: Measuring changes caused by disease 2003, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex.
35. Westerhoff H.V., Palsson B.O. The evolution of molecular biology into systems biology. Nature Biotechnology 2004, 22:1249-1252.
36. Yushkevich P.A., Piven J., Hazlett H.C., Smith R.G., Ho S., Gee J.C., et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 2006, 31:1116-1128.
37. Zhang L., Kulkarni K., Somayaji M.R., Xenos M., Linninger A.A. Discovery of transport and reaction properties in distributed systems. AIChE Journal 2007, 53:381-396.