Stability analysis of ultrasound thick-shell contrast agents

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 24-34

  Lu, Xiaozhen ^a   Chahine, Georges L ^a   Hsiao, Chao Tsung ^a  

^a Dynaflow Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSION; CONTRAST AGENT; EIGENVALUE PROBLEM; MICRO-BUBBLE; MICROBUBBLES; NON-SPHERICAL; PERTURBATION AMPLITUDE; SMALL PERTURBATIONS; STABILITY ANALYSIS; THICK SHELLS;

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ASYMPTOTIC ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS;

LINEAR STABILITY ANALYSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; SOLVENT; TRIACETIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG STABILITY; MATHEMATICS; MICROBUBBLE; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASOUND; VISCOSITY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG STABILITY; MATHEMATICS; MICROBUBBLES; SOLVENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TRIACETIN; ULTRASONICS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84855965764     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3666000     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. A. Raisinghangi and A. N. Demaria, Physical principles of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents., Am. J. Cardiol. 90 (10A), 3-7 (2002). 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02858-8
2. R. J. Price, D. M. Skyba, S. Kaul, and T. C. Skalak, Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound., Circulation 98, 1264-1267 (1998). (Pubitemid 28443388)
3. M. Ward, J. R. Wu, and J. F. Chiu, Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2951-2957 (1999). 10.1121/1.426908 (Pubitemid 29218411)
4. H. Becher and P. Burns, Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000), pp. 200.
5. J. A. Rooney, Hemolysis near an ultrasonically pulsating bubble., Science 169, 869-871 (1970). 10.1126/science.169.3948.869
6. D. L. Miller, R. A. Gies, and W. B. Chrisler, Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentration in a thin-disc exposure chamber., Ultrasound Med. Biol. 23, 625-633 (1997). 10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00042- 2 (Pubitemid 27268476)
7. D. L. Miller, A review of the ultrasonic bioeffects of microsonation, gas-body activation, and related cavitation-like phenomena., Ultrasound Med. Biol. 13, 443-470 (1987). 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90110-4
8. D. Dalecki, S. Z. Child, C. H. Raeman, C. Xing, S. Gracewski, and E. L. Carstensen, Bioeffects of positive and negative acoustic pressures in pulsed ultrasound., Ultrasound Med. Biol. 26, 1327-1332 (2000). 10.1016/S0301-5629(00) 00297-0
9. E. Unger, T. P. McCreery, R. Sweitzer, V. Caldwell, and Y. Wu, Acoustically active lipospheres containing paclitaxel: A new therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent., Invest. Radiol. 12, 886-892 (1998). 10.1097/00004424-199812000-00007 (Pubitemid 30247061)
10. P. P. Chang, W. S. Chen, P. D. Mourad, S. L. Poliachik, and L. A. Crum, Thresholds for inertial cavitation in albunex suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Freq. Control. 48, 161-170 (2001). 10.1109/58.895927 (Pubitemid 32191192)
11. W. S. Chen, T. J. Matula, A. A. Brayman, and L. A. Crum, A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different Ultrasound contrast agents., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113 (1), 643-651 (2003). 10.1121/1.1529667 (Pubitemid 36105713)
12. A. Prosperetti, Viscous effects on perturbed spherical flows., Q. Appl. Math. 34, 339-352 (1977).
13. J. E. Chomas, P. A. Dayton, J. S. Allen, K. Morgan, and K. W. Ferrara, Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 48, 232-248 (2001). 10.1109/58.896136 (Pubitemid 32191199)
14. E. Coddington and N. Levinson, Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955), pp. 429.
15. C.-T. Hsiao, X. Lu, and G. L. Chahine, Three-dimensional modeling of the dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent., Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36 (12), 2065-2079 (2010). 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.08.022