Differential association and substance use: Assessing the roles of discriminant validity, socialization, and selection in traditional empirical tests

European Journal of Criminology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 73-96

  Rebellon, Cesar J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

differential association; drugs; peers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855960445     PISSN: 14773708     EISSN: 17412609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477370811421647     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agnew R.The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency.Criminology. 1991;29:47-72.
2. Agnew RWhy Do Criminals Offend? A General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury; 2005:.
3. Agnew R,White HR.An empirical test of general strain theory.Criminology. 1992;30:475-499.
4. Akers RLCriminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury; 2000:.
5. Akers RLSocial Learning and Social Structure: a General Theory of Crime and Deviance. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 2009:.
6. Akers RL,Lee G.A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent smoking.Journal of Drug Issues. 1996;26:317-343.
7. Akers RL,Krohn MD,Lanza-Kaduce L,Radosevich M.Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory.American Sociological Review. 1979;44:636-655.
8. Anderson ECode of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton; 1999:.
9. Aseltine RH.A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1995;36:103-121.
10. Browne MW.Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1984;37:62-83.
11. Bruinsma GJN.Differential association theory reconsidered: an extension and its empirical test.Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 1992;8:29-49.
12. Burgess RL,Akers RL.A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior.Social Problems. 1966;14:128-146.
13. Campbell DT,Fiske DW.Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin. 1959;56:81-105.
14. Carmines EG,McIver JPSocial Measurement: Current Issues. Bohrnstedt GWBorgatta EF, ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1981:65-115.
15. Elliott DS,Ageton SS.Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency.American Sociological Review. 1980;45:95-110.
16. Elliott DS,Huizinga D,Ageton SSExplaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985:.
17. Elliott DS,Knowles BA,Canter RJThe Epidemiology of Delinquent Behavior and Drug Use among American Adolescents. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute; 1981:.
18. Glueck S,Glueck EUnraveling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Commonwealth Fund; 1950:.
19. Gottfredson MR,Hirschi TA General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1990:.
20. Greenberg DF,Tamarelli TR,Kelley MSCrime and Social Organization. Advances in Criminological Theory. Waring EWeisburd D, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; 2002:49-94.
21. Haynie DL.Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?.American Journal of Sociology. 2001;106:1013-1057.
22. Haynie DL.Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer delinquency.Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2002;18:99-134.
23. Haynie DL,Osgood DW.Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?.Social Forces. 2005;84:1109-1130.
24. Heimer K,Matsueda RL.Role-taking, role-commitment, and delinquency - a theory of differential social-control.American Sociological Review. 1994;59:365-390.
25. Hindelang MJ,Hirschi T,Weis JGMeasuring Delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1981:.
26. Hu L,Bentler PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
27. Kessler RC,Greenberg DFLinear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change. New York: Academic Press; 1981:.
28. Knecht A,Snijders T,Baerveldt C,Steglich CEG,Werner R.Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence.Social Development. 2010;19:494-514.
29. Krohn MD,Skinner WF,Massey JL,Akers RL.Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: a longitudinal study.Social Problems. 1985;32:455-473.
30. Loehlin JCLatent Variable Models: an Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992:.
31. Marsh HW,Hocevar D.Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups.Psychological Bulletin. 1985;97:562-582.
32. Matsueda RL,Anderson K.The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior.Criminology. 1998;36:269-308.
33. Meldrum RC,Young JTN,Weerman FM.Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquency peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2009;46:353-376.
34. Nagin DS,Paternoster R.On the relationship of past to future participation in delinquency.Criminology. 1991;29:163-189.
35. Orcutt JA.Differential association and marijuana use: a closer look at Sutherland (with a little help from Becker).Criminology. 1987;25:341-358.
36. Osgood DW,Schreck CJ.A new method for studying the extent, stability, and predictors of individual specialization in violence.Criminology. 2007;45:273-309.
37. Osgood DW,Johnston LD,O'Malley PM,Bachman JG.The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood.American Sociological Review. 1988;53:81-93.
38. Paternoster R,Mazerolle P.General strain theory and delinquency: a replication and extension.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 1994;31:235-263.
39. Rebellon CJ.Do adolescents engage in delinquency to attract the social attention of peers? An extension and longitudinal test of the social reinforcement hypothesis.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2006;43:387-411.
40. Rebellon CJ,Waldman I.Deconstructing 'force and fraud': an empirical assessment of the generality of crime.Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2003;19:303-331.
41. Schreiber JB,Stage FK,King J,Nora A,Barlow EA.Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review.Journal of Educational Research. 2006;99:323-337.
42. Sutherland EHThe Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1947:.
43. Thornberry TP.Toward an interactional theory of delinquency.Criminology. 1987;25:863-891.
44. Thornberry TP,Lozotte AJ,Krohn MD,Farnworth M,Jang SJ.Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: a longitudinal test of interactional theory.Criminology. 1994;32:47-84.
45. Tittle CR,Burke MJ,Jackson EF.Modeling Sutherland's theory of differential association: Toward an empirical clarification.Social Forces. 1986;65:405-432.
46. Warr M.Age, peers, and delinquency.Criminology. 1993;31:17-40.
47. Warr M.Organization and instigation in delinquent groups.Criminology. 1996;34:11-38.
48. Warr MCompanions in Crime: the Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
49. Warr M,Stafford M.The influence of delinquent peers - What they think or what they do.Criminology. 1991;29:851-866.
50. Weerman FM.Delinquent peers in context: a longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects.Criminology. 2011;49:253-286.
51. Weerman FM,Smeenk WH.Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: a comparison using two measurement methods.Criminology. 2005;43:499-523.
52. White HR,Labouvie EW.Generality versus specificity of problem behaviors: Psychological and functional differences.Journal of Drug Issues. 1994;24:55-74.
53. Zhang L,Messner SF.The effects of alternative measures of delinquent peers on self-reported delinquency.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2000;37:323-337.