MM-GB/SA rescoring of docking poses

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 819, Issue , 2012, Pages 255-268

  Guimarães, Cristiano R W ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding; Docking; Knime; Lead optimization; MM GB SA; WaterMap

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; THERMODYNAMICS;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84855942603     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_17     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ, Essex JW (2002) A review of protein-small molecule docking methods. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 16:151-16.
2. Shoichet BK, McGovern SL, Wei B et al (2002) Lead discovery using molecular docking. Curr Opin Chem Biol 6:439-44.
3. Walters WP, Stahl MT, Murcko MA (1998) Virtual screening -an overview. Drug Discovery Today 3:160-17.
4. Shoichet BK (2004) Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 432:862-865. (Pubitemid 40037142)
5. Powers RA, Morandi F, Shoichet BK (2002) Structure-based discovery of a novel, noncovalent inhibitor of AmpC beta-lactamase. Structure 10:1013-1023. (Pubitemid 34786743)
6. Schapira M, Abagyan R, Totrov M (2003) Nuclear hormone receptor targeted virtual screening. J Med Chem 46:3045-3059. (Pubitemid 36775926)
7. Alvarez JC (2004) High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:1-6.
8. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ et al (1982) A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 161:269-288.
9. Jones G, Willet P, Glen RC et al (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 267:727-748. (Pubitemid 27170693)
10. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer Tet al (1996) A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 261:470-489. (Pubitemid 26335901)
11. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB et al (2004) Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 47:1739-1749. (Pubitemid 38380917)
12. Muegge I, Martin YC (1999) A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J Med Chem 42:791-804. (Pubitemid 29136170)
13. Charifson PS, Corkey JJ, Murcko MA et al (1999) Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J Med Chem 42:5100-5109. (Pubitemid 30020261)
14. Perola E, Walters WP, Charifson PS (2004) A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance. Proteins 56:235-249. (Pubitemid 38850158)
15. Stahl M, Rarey M (2001) Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J Med Chem 44:1035-1042. (Pubitemid 32852130)
16. Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli A-M et al (2006) A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J Med Chem 49:5912-5931. (Pubitemid 44484938)
17. Kuhn B, Kollman PA (2000) Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. J Med Chem 43:3786-3791.
18. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC et al (1990) Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 112:6127-6129.
19. Bernacki K, Kalyanaraman C, Jacobson MP (2005) Virtual Ligand Screening against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: Improving docking enrichment physics-based methods. J Biomol Screening 10:675-681. (Pubitemid 41476801)
20. Huang N, Kalyanaraman C, Irwin JJ et al (2006) Physics-based scoring of proteinligand complexes: Enrichment of known inhibitors in large-scale virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 46:243-253. (Pubitemid 43282119)
21. Huang N, Kalyanaraman C, Bernacki K et al (2006) Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding. Phys Chem Chem Phys 8:5166-5177.
22. Lyne PD, Lamb ML, Saeh JC (2006) Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring. J Med Chem 49:4805-4808. (Pubitemid 44201037)
23. Lee MR, Sun Y (2007) Improving docking accuracy through molecular mechanics generalized Born optimization and scoring. J Chem Theory Comput 3:1106-1119.
24. Huang N, Jacobson MP (2007) Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 10:325-331. (Pubitemid 46800226)
25. Foloppe N, Hubbard R (2006) Towards predictive ligand design with free-energy based computational methods? Curr Med Chem 13:3583-3608. (Pubitemid 44873749)
26. Pearlman DA (2005) Evaluating the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase. J Med Chem 48:7796-807. (Pubitemid 41698819)
27. Kawatkar S, Wang H, Czerminski R et al (2009) Virtual fragment screening: An exploration of various docking and scoring protocols for fragments using Glide. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 23:527-539.
28. Guimarães CRW, Cardozo M (2008) MM-GB/SA rescoring of docking poses in structure-based lead optimization. J Chem Inf Model 48:958-970.
29. Abel R, Young T, Farid R et al (2008) Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of Factor Xa ligand binding. J Am Chem Soc 130:2817-2831. (Pubitemid 351416242)
30. Guimarães CRW, Mathiowetz AM (2010) Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free-energy perturbation calculations. J Chem Inf Model 50:547-559.
31. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225-11235.
32. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J et al (2001) Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 105:6474-6487. (Pubitemid 35339015)
33. MacroModel, version 9.8, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2010.
34. Maestro, version 9.1, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2010.
35. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP et al (2006) Extra precision Glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem 49:6177-6196. (Pubitemid 44595196)
36. Glide, version 5.6, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2010.
37. Polak E, Ribiere G (1969) Note sur la convergence de méthodes de directions conjuguées. Revenue Francaise Informat. Recherche Operationelle, Serie Rouge.
38. Chang G, Guida W, Still WC (1989) An internal coordinate Monte-Carlo method for searching conformational space. J Am Chem Soc 111:4379-4384.
39. Kuhn B, Gerber P, Schulz-Gasch, T et al (2005) Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery. J Med Chem 48:4040-4048. (Pubitemid 40800612)
40. Chang CA, Chen W, Gilson MK (2007) Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1534-1539. (Pubitemid 46214625)
41. Jorgensen WL, Ulmschneider JP, Tirado-Rives J (2004) Free energies of hydration from a generalized Born model and an all-atom force Field. J Phys Chem B 108:16264-16270.
42. Roe DR, Okur A, Wickstrom L et al (2007) Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: Comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation. J Phys Chem B 111:1846-1857. (Pubitemid 46384278)
43. Gallicchio E, Kubo MM, Levy RM (2000) Enthalpy-entropy and cavity decomposition of alkane hydration free energies:Numerical results and implications for theories of hydrophobic solvation. J Phys Chem B 104:6271-628.
44. Pitera JW, van Gunsteren WF (2001) The importance of solute-solvent van der Waals interactions with interior atoms of biopolymers. J Am Chem Soc 123:3163-3164. (Pubitemid 32879595)
45. Brown SP, Muchmore SW, Hajduk PJ (2009) Healthy skepticism: Assessing realistic model performance. Drug Discovery Today 14:420-427.
46. KNIME, version 1.2, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2008