Auditory middle latency responses in individuals with debilitating tinnitus

International Tinnitus Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 104-110

  Theodoroff, Sarah M ^a,b   Chambers, Ron D ^a   Folmer, Robert L ^b   McMillan, Garnett P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR REHABILITATIVE AUDITORY RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory; Auditory perception; Evoked potentials; Tinnitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TINNITUS; TINNITUS HANDICAP INVENTORY QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TINNITUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855941587     PISSN: 09465448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Maurizi M, Ottaviani F, Paludetti G, Almadori G, Tassoni A. Contribution to the differentiation of peripheral versus central tinnitus via auditory brain stem response evaluation. Audiology. 1985;34:207-16. (Pubitemid 15089184)
2. Ikner C, Hassen A. The effect of tinnitus on ABR latencies. Ear Hear. 1990;11(1):16-20. (Pubitemid 20130640)
3. Lemaire M, Beutter P. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in patients with tinnitus. Audiology. 1995;34:287-300. (Pubitemid 26061215)
4. Rosenhall U, Axelsson A. Auditory brainstem response latencies in patients with tinnitus. Scand Audiol. 1995;24:97-100.
5. Colding-Jorgensen E, Lauritzen M, Johnsen N, Mikkelsen K, Saermark K. On the evidence of auditory evoked magnetic fields as an objective measure of tinnitus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;83:322-7.
6. Hoke M, Feldmann H, Pantev C, Lutkenhoner B, Lehnertz K. Objective evidence of tinnitus in auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hear Res. 1989;37(3):281-6. (Pubitemid 19051637)
7. Jacobson G, Ahmad B, Moran J, Newman C, Tepley N, Wharton J. Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100-M200) measurements in tinnitus and normal groups. Hear Res. 1991;56:44-52.
8. Jacobson G, Calder J, Newman C, Peterson E, Wharton J, Ahmad B. Electrophysiological indices of selective auditory attention in subjects with and without tinnitus. Hear Res. 1996;97:66-74. (Pubitemid 26291730)
9. Kadner A, Viirre E, Westner D, Walsh S, Hestenes J, Vankov Aet al. Lateral inhibition in the auditory cortex: An EEG index of tinnitus? Neuroreport. 2002;13(4):443-6. (Pubitemid 34293186)
10. Weisz N, Voss S, Berg P, Elbert T. Abnormal auditory mismatch response in tinnitus sufferers with high-frequency loss is associated with subjective distress. BMC Neurosci. 2004;Mar4;5:8.
11. Norena A, Cransac H, Chery-Croze S. Towards an objectification by classification of tinnitus. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110:666-75. (Pubitemid 29236394)
12. Attias J, Urbach D, Gold S, Shemesh Z. Auditory event related potentials in chronic tinnitus patients with noise induced hearing loss. Hear Res. 1993;71(1-2):106-13. (Pubitemid 24029857)
13. Gerken G, Hesse P, Wiorkowski J. Auditory evoked responses in control subjects and in patients with problem-tinnitus. Hear Res. 2001;157:52-64. (Pubitemid 32677965)
14. Hall III JW. Overview of auditory evoked responses: Past, Present and Future. In: Hall III JW (ed.) Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, p. 3-40;1992.
15. Eggermont J. Central tinnitus. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003;30:S7-S12. (Pubitemid 36132330)
16. Cacace A. Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: Crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity. Hear Res. 2003;175:112-32.
17. Eggermont JJ. Cortical tonotopic map reorganization and its implications for treatment of tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126:9-12.
18. Mühlnickel W, Elbert T, Taub E, Flor H. Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10340-3. (Pubitemid 28415343)
19. Kaltenbach JA. Neurophysiologic mechanisms of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:125-37. (Pubitemid 30239046)
20. Norena AJ, Eggermont JJ. 2003. Changes in spontaneous neural activity immediately after an acoustic trauma: Implications for neural correlates of tinnitus. Hear Res. 2003;183:137-53. (Pubitemid 37117170)
21. Nelson M, Hall III J, Jacobson G. Factors affecting the recordability of auditory evoked response component Pb (P1). J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8:89-99.
22. erger J, Oliver T, Chmiel R. Auditory middle latency response: A perspective. Semin Hear. 1988;9(1):75-86.
23. Littell RC, Pendergast J, Natarajan R. Modeling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine. 2000;19:1793-19.
24. Eggermont JJ. Electric and magnetic fields of synchronous neural activity. In: RF Burkard, JJ Eggermont, M Don (eds). Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 2-21;2007.
25. Woods DL, Clayworth CC. Age-related changes in human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neu-rophysiol. 1986;65:297-303. (Pubitemid 16085207)
26. Chambers R, Griffiths S. Effects of age on the adult auditory middle latency response. Hear Res. 1991;51:1-10.
27. Chambers R. Differential age effects for components of the adult auditory middle latency response. Hear Res. 1992;58:123-31.