Pragmatic Choice in Conversation

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-20

  Gibbs, Raymond W ^a   Van Orden, Guy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Conversation; Dynamical systems; Pragmatics; Psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84855921927     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01172.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abbs, J. H., & Connor, N. P. (1989). Motor coordination for functional human behavior: Perspectives from a speech motor data base. In S. Wallace (Ed.), Perspectives on the coordination of movement (pp. 157-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. New York: Copernicus.
3. Barr, D., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418.
4. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2005). Mindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other (pp. 271-283). New York: Guilford.
5. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Francik, E., & Clark, H. (1985). How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 360-368.
7. Garrett, M. F. (2000). Remarks on the architecture of language processing systems. In Y., Grodzinsky, L., Shapiro & D., Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain (pp. 31-69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Gibbs, R. (1986). Why are some indirect speech acts are conventional? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 182-196.
9. Gibbs, R. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Gibbs, R., & Bryant, G. (2008). Striving for optimal relevance in answering questions. Cognition, 106, 345-369.
11. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Hollis, J., Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2009). Origins of order in cognitive activity. In S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Recent advances and future directions in the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems (pp. 206-241). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kello, C. T., Anderson, G. G., Holden, J. G., & Van Orden, G. (2008). The pervasiveness of 1/f scaling in speech reflects the metastable basis of cognition. Cognitive Science, 32, 1217-1231.
14. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 89-109.
16. Keysar, B., & Henly, A. (2002). Speakers' overestimate of their effectiveness. Psychological Science, 13, 207-212.
17. Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2009). Soft-assembled mechanisms for the unified theory. In J. P. Spencer, M. Thomas, & J. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 253-267). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. (2010). Voluntary performance of cognitive and motor tasks. Mind & Matter, 8, 19-44.
19. Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117, 785-807.
20. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Morgan, J. (1975). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 45-61). New York: Academic Press.
22. Perkins, M. (2008). Pragmatic impairment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131.
24. Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2002). Variability and determinism in motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 99-125.
25. Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press.
26. Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 305-319.
27. Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and content (pp. 53-68). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language, 17, 3-23.
29. Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 14425-14430.
30. Turvey, M. T. (2007). Action and perception at the level of synergies. Human Movement Science, 26, 657-697.
31. Van Lieshout, P. H. H. M., Bose, A., Square, P. A., & Steele, C. M. (2007). Speech motor control in fluent and dysfluent speech production of an individual with apraxia of speech and Broca's aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 159-188.
32. Van Orden, G. (2010). Voluntary performance. Medicina.
33. Van Orden, G., & Kloos, H. (2005). The question of phonology and reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 61-78). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
34. Van Orden, G., Kloos, H., & Wallot, S. (in press). Living in the pink: Intentionality, wellbeing, and complexity. In C. A. Hooker (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Van Orden, G., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25, 111-172.
36. Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R.J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound & syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442-472.
37. Wallot, S., & Van Orden, G. (in press). Grounding language performance in the anticipatory dynamics of the body. Ecological Psychology.
38. Zbilut, J. P. (2004). Unstable singularities and randomness: Their importance in the complexity of physical, biological and social sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.