Prediction of delayed graft function by means of a novel web-based calculator: A single-center experience

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 240-244

  Rodrigo, E ^a   Minambres E ^b   Ruiz, J C ^a   Ballesteros, A ^b   Pinera C ^a   Quintanar, J ^a   Fernandez Fresnedo G ^a   Palomar, R ^a   Gomez Alamillo C ^a   Arias, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MARQUÉS DE VALDECILLA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Delayed graft function; graft survival; kidney transplantation; prediction models

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; FEMALE; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM;

GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84855912948     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03810.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Formica RN, Poggio ED, Parikh CR,. Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 1039-1047.
2. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, Port FK, Schmouder RL,. Delayed graft function: Risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. Transplantation 1997; 63: 968-974. (Pubitemid 27173019)
3. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, et al,. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2004; 364: 1814-1827. (Pubitemid 39488068)
4. Rosenthal JT, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson A, et al,. The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1991; 51: 1115-1118.
5. Rodrigo E, Ruiz JC, Piñera C, et al,. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day two as criterion in defining delayed graft function. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1163-1169. (Pubitemid 38868609)
6. Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Garg AX, et al,. Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: A systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 2995-3003.
7. Shilliday IR, Sherif M,. Calcium channel blockers for preventing acute tubular necrosis in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007; 4: CD003421. doi:.
8. Hall IE, Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, et al,. IL-18 and urinary NGAL predict dialysis and graft recovery after kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21: 189-197.
9. Irish WD, McCollum DA, Tesi RJ, et al,. Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2967-2974. (Pubitemid 37305660)
10. Irish WD, Ilsley JN, Schnitzler MA, Feng S, Brennan DC,. A risk prediction model for delayed graft function in the current era of deceased donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2279-2286.
11. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA, et al,. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281-1286. (Pubitemid 35402598)
12. Nyberg SL, Matas AJ, Kreners WK, et al,. Improved scoring system to assess adult donors for cadaver renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 715-721. (Pubitemid 36745244)
13. Schold JD, Kaplan B, Baliga RS, et al,. The broad spectrum of quality in deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 757-765. (Pubitemid 40461285)
14. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al,. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 2009; 88: 231-236.
15. Jeldres C, Cardinal H, Duclos A, et al,. Prediction of delayed graft function after renal transplantation. Can Urol Assoc J 2009; 3: 377-382.
16. Moore J, Tan K, Cockwell P, et al,. Predicting early renal allograft function using clinical variables. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 2669-2677.
17. Kaisar MO, Johnson DW,. Validation of a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in Australian adult deceased donor renal transplant recipients. Nephrology 2006; 11: 78-79.
18. Grossberg JA, Reinert SE, Monaco AP, Gohh R, Morrissey PE,. Utility of a mathematical nomogram to predict delayed graft function: A single-center experience. Transplantation 2006; 81: 155-159.
19. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S,. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997; 16: 965-980. (Pubitemid 27198985)
20. Kaplan EL, Meier P,. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete data. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-481.
21. Steyerberger EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al,. Assessing the performance of prediction models. A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 128-138.
22. Rodrigo E, Lõpez-Rasines G, Ruiz JC, et al,. Determinants of resistive index shortly after transplantation: Independent relationship with delayed graft function. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 114: 178-186.
23. Kubal C, Bhati C,. Delayed graft function: Utility of predictive models. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2818-2819. (Pubitemid 44571708)
24. Hariharan S, McBride MA, Cherikh WS, et al,. Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 311-318. (Pubitemid 34754077)
25. Jochmans I, Pirenne J,. Graft quality assessment in kidney transplantation: Not an exact science yet Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011; 16: 174-179.