Prediction of delayed graft function after renal transplantation

Journal of the Canadian Urological Association

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 377-382

  Jeldres, Claudio ^a   Cardinal, Héloïse ^a   Duclos, Alain ^a   Shariat, Shahrokh F ^a   Suardi, Nazareno ^a   Capitanio, Umberto ^a   Hébert, Marie Josèe ^a   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350511161     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: 19116470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Greenstein S, Siegal B. Compliance and noncompliance in patients with a functioning renal transplant: a multicenter study. Transplantation 1998;66:1718-26.
2. Port FK, Merion RM, Finley MP, et al. Trends in organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005. Am J Transplant 2007:7:1319-26.
3. Geddes CC, Woo YM, Jardine AG. The impact of delayed graft function on the long-term outcome of renal transplantation. J Nephrol 2002;15:17-21.
4. Segev DL, Gentry SE, Warren DS, et al. Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs. JAMA 2005;293:1883-90.
5. Irish WD, McCollum DA, Tesi RJ, et al. Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:2967-74.
6. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2004;364:1814-27.
7. Koning OH, Ploeg RJ, van Bockel JH, et al. Risk factors for delayed graft function in cadaveric kidney transplantation: a prospective study of renal function and graft survival after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution in multi-organ donors. European Multicenter Study Group. Transplantation 1997;63:1620-8.
8. Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments. Stat Med 2000;19:113-32.
9. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Jr., Borsboom GJ, et al. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:774-81.
10. Atkinson AC. A note on the generalized information criterion for choice of a model. Biometrika 1980:67: 413-8.
11. Van Houwelingen JC, Le Cessie S. Predictive value of statistical models. Stat Med 1990;9:1303-25.
12. Sanfilippo F, Vaughn WK, Spees EK, et al. The detrimental effects of delayed graft function in cadaver donor renal transplantation. Transplantation 1984;38:643-8.
13. Feldman HI, Gayner R, Berlin JA, et al. Delayed function reduces renal allograft survival independent of acute rejection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:1306-13.
14. Quiroga I, McShane P, Koo DD, et al. Major effects of delayed graft function and cold ischaemia time on renal allograft survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:1689-96.
15. Almond PS, Troppmann C, Escobar F, et al. Economic impact of delayed graft function. Transplant Proc 1991;23:1304.
16. Asher J, Wilson C, Gok M, et al. Factors predicting duration of delayed graft function in non-heart- beating donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005;37:348-9.
17. Senel FM, Karakayali H, Moray G, et al. Delayed graft function: predictive factors and impact on outcome in living-related kidney transplantations. Ren Fail 1998;20:589-95.
18. Take the Nomogram Challenge. www.nomogram.org/full/pros-calc.php (Accessed August 31, 2009).
19. Capitanio U, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, et al. Clinicians are most familiar with nomograms and rate their clinical usefulness hghest, look-up tables are second best. Eur Urol 2008;54:958-9.
20. Grossberg JA, Reinert SE, Monaco AP, et al. Utility of a mathematical nomogram to predict delayed graft function: a single-center experience. Transplantation 2006;81:155-9.
21. Chun FK, Graefen M, Briganti A, et al. Initial Biopsy Outcome Prediction-Head-to-Head Comparison of a Logistic Regression-Based Nomogram versus Artificial Neural Network. Eur Urol 2007;51:1236-43.
22. Specht MC, Kattan MW, Gonen M, et al. Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: clinicians versus nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:654-9.