Judicial Rehabilitation? A View from England

European Journal of Probation

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 36-49

  Padfield, Nicky ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Criminal records; Public protection; Rehabilitation of offenders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855907083     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20662203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/206622031100300104     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bichard (2004) A Public Inquiry Report on child protection procedures in Humberside Police and Cambridgeshire Constabulary, particularly the effectiveness of relevant intelligence-based record keeping vetting practices since 1995 and information sharing with other agencies (Stationery Office: House of Commons 653), available at www.bichardinquiry.org.uk/10663/report.pdf.
2. Confederation of British Industry (2008) Getting Back on the Straight and Narrow: A better criminal justice system for all London: Confederation of British Industry.
3. Dhami M, Souza K, The Study of Sentencing and its Outcomes: a pilot report (MoJ Research Series 2/09).
4. Fletcher (2001), Recruiting and employing offenders (Joseph Rowntree Foundation) available at www.jrf.org.uk/publications/recruiting-and-employing-offenders-impact-police-act.
5. Home Office (2002) Breaking the Circle: A report of the review of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act London: Home Office.
6. Hough M., (2010) ‘Gold standard or fool's gold: The pursuit of certainty in experimental criminology’ 10 Criminology and Criminal Justice 11.
7. Hughes K, (2010) ‘Proportionality not presumption’ 69 Cambridge Law Journal 4 McKenna, K. (2007) Evaluation of the North Liverpool Community Justice Centre, Ministry of Justice Research Series 12/07.
8. Maruna S., (2001) Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C.
9. Maruna S., (2011, forthcoming) ‘Reentry as a rite of passage’ Punishment and Society.
10. Maruna S., LeBel T., (2003) ‘Welcome home? Examining the ‘re-entry court’ concept from a strengths-based perspective' 4 Western Criminology Review 91.
11. Mason S., (2010) A Balanced Approach: Safeguarding the public through the fair and proportionate use of accurate criminal record information London: Home.
12. Mawby R, (2010) ‘Police corporate communications, crime reporting and the shaping of policing news’ 20 Policing and Society 124.
13. Nacro (2003) Recruiting Ex-offenders — The Employers' Perspective: A report on and guide to recruiting ex-offenders based on the views and recommendations of employers, employer organizations and the Trades Union Congress London: Nacro.
14. Nacro (2010) Change the Record: giving reformed offenders the chance to work London: Nacro (available at www.nacro.org.uk/data/files/change-the-record-report1–829.pdf).
15. National Audit Office (2004) Criminal Records Bureau: Delivering Safer Recruitment? available at www.nao.org.uk/publications/0304/deliveringsaferrecruitment.aspx.
16. Spencer J R, (2006) Evidence of Bad Character (Hart).
17. Thomas T, (2001) ‘The national collection of criminal records: A question of data quality’ Criminal Law Review 886.
18. Thomas T, (2006) ‘The Criminal Records Bureau and its registered bodies: New Regulations for a ‘disparate and unwieldy’ customer network’ 28 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 359.
19. Thomas T, (2007) Criminal Records (Palgrave Macmillan).
20. Working Links (2010) Prejudged: Tagged for Life, available at workinglinks.co.uk/pdf/Prejudged%20Tagged%20for%20life.pdf.