The criminal records bureau and its registered bodies: New regulations for a 'disparate and unwieldy' customer network

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volumn 28, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 359-366

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548590295     PISSN: 09649069     EISSN: 14699621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09649060601119573     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bichard Report (2004) A Public Inquiry Report, TSO, London
2. CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) (2001) Code of Practice for Registered Persons and other recipients of Disclosure Information, CRB, Liverpool
3. CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) (2003) 'The Government announces an increase to the cost of Disclosures with effect from 1 April 2004 and issues a consultation on proposed draft regulations' (press release), Liverpool
4. CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) (2005) 'Regulations Under Part V of the Police Act 1997: Analysis of responses to the Consultation Document', CRB, Liverpool
5. CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) (2006) Five Year Strategy and Business Plan 2006/07, CRB, Liverpool
6. Home Office (1993) Disclosure of Criminal Records for Employment Vetting Purposes: A Consultation Paper, HMSO, London
7. Home Office (1996) On the Record: The Government's Proposals for Access to Criminal Records for Employment and Related Purposes in England and Wales, HMSO, London
8. Home Office (1998) 'Criminal Records Bureau to Strengthen Child Protection Safeguards' (press release), Home Office, London
9. Home Office (2003) 'Government Announces New Measures to Improve the Criminal Records Bureau' (press release), Home Office, London
10. Home Office (2003) Criminal Records Bureau: Reform of the Disclosure Process: A Consultation Paper, Home Office, London
11. Home Office (2003) Criminal Records Bureau: Should Applicants for Disclosures be Required to Submit their Fingerprints with the Application? A Consultation Paper, Home Office, London
12. Home Office (2004) Bichard Inquiry Recommendation: Progress Report, Londoon
13. IRT (Independent Review Team) (2002) Main Findings from the Independent Review of the Criminal Records Bureau, Home Office, London
14. NCVYS (National Council for Voluntary Youth Services) (2003) 'Voluntary Youth Sector responds to Government measures to improve the Criminal Records Bureau' (press release)
15. Suff, R. (2005) 'Checking out the activities of the Criminal Records Bureau',. IRS Employment Review, 483, pp. 42-48.
16. Thomas, T. (2002) 'Employment screening and the Criminal Records Bureau',. Industrial Law Journal, 31, pp. 55-70.
17. Travis, A. (2002) 'Overwhelmed system delays criminal record checks',. The Guardian