Reading through a plan: A visual interpretation of what plans mean and how they innovate

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 309-327

  Ryan, Brent D ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Plan evaluation; Plan interpretation; Plan reading; Planning theory; Plans

Indexed keywords

IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; PLANNING HISTORY; PLANNING PRACTICE; PLANNING THEORY;

EID: 84855889218     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2011.616995     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abbott, C. (1991). Urban design in Portland, Oregon, as policy and process: 1960-1989. Planning Perspectives, 6(1), 1-18.
2. Alexander, E. R. (2002). Planning rights: Toward normative criteria for evaluating plans. International Planning Studies, 7(3), 191-212. (Pubitemid 35022615)
3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224.
4. Baer, W. C. (1997). General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3), 329-344.
5. Berke, P., & Godschalk, D. (2009). Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies. Journal of Planning Literature, 23(3), 227-240.
6. Burchell, R. W., Listokin, D., & Galley, C. C. (2000). Smart growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 821-879.
7. Burnham, D. H., & Bennett, E. H. (1909). Plan of Chicago: Prepared under the direction of the Commercial Club during the years MCMVI, MCMVII, and MCMVIII. Chicago, IL: The Commercial Club.
8. Campbell, S., & Fainstein, S. (2003) Readings in planning theory (2nd ed.). London, UK: Blackwell.
9. Cerdá D. I. (1867). Teoriá General de la Urbanización, y aplicacíon de sus principios y doctrinas a la reforme u ensanche de Barcelona. Madrid: Imprenta Española.
10. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). (2011). GO TO 2040. Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2040/download-the- full-plan
11. City of Chicago. (2002). A quality place to live: The residential sector. In The Chicago central area plan: Preparing the central city for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: City of Chicago Department of Planning and Development.
12. City of Dubuque. (2008). A guide to the Dubuque comprehensive plan. Dubuque, IA: City of Dubuque Planning Services Department. Retrieved October 14, 2010, from http://www.cityofdubuque.org/DocumentView.aspx?DID-284
13. Clay, G. (1973). Close-up: How to read the American city. New York, NY: Praeger.
14. Cullen, G. (1971). Townscape. Oxford, UK: The Architectural Press.
15. Dagenhart, R., & Sawicki, D. (1992). Architecture and planning: The divergence of two fields. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12(1), 1-16. (Pubitemid 23365826)
16. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2001). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York, NY: North Point Press.
17. Evans-Cowley, J. S., & Zimmerman Gough, M. (2009). Evaluating new urbanist plans in post-Katrina Mississippi. Journal of Urban Design, 14(4), 439-461.
18. Fogelson, R. (2001). Downtown: Its rise and fall, 1880-1950. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Friedmann, J. (1971). The future of comprehensive urban planning: A critique. Public Administration Review, 31(3), 315-326.
21. Hall, P. (1980). Great planning disasters. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22. Hall, P. (1988). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Blackwell.
23. Hancock, J. (1960). John Nolen: The background of a pioneer planner. Journal of the American Planning Association, 26(4), 302-312.
24. Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143-162. (Pubitemid 23367381)
25. Healy, P. (1993). The communicative work of development plans. Environment and Planning B, 20(1), 83-104.
26. Hoch, C. J. (2002). Evaluating plans pragmatically. Planning Theory, 1(1), 53-75.
27. Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28. Hosken, F. P. (1972). The language of cities: A visual introduction to the form and function of the city. Cambridge, MA: Schenckmann.
29. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introductive to collaborative rationality for public policy. London, UK: Routledge.
30. Isenberg, A. (2005). Downtown America: A history of the place and of the people who made it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Jacobs, A. (1985). Looking at cities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Keating, D., & Krumholz, N. (1991). Downtown plans of the 1980s: The case for more equity in the 1990s. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(2), 136-152.
33. Khakee, A. (2000). Reading plans as an exercise in evaluation. Evaluation, 6(2), 119-136.
34. Kreyling, C., Scimmenti, M., Gaston, G., Hutcheson, R., Hardison, R., Gaffney, A., & Nashville Civic Design Center. (2005). The plan of Nashville: Avenues to a great city. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
35. Lilley, K. D. (2000). Mapping the medieval city: Plan analysis and urban history. Urban History, 27(1), 5-30. (Pubitemid 30458273)
36. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Lynch K. (1972). What time is this place? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Lynch K. (1981). Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Mandelbaum, S. J. (1990). Reading plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(3), 350-358.
40. Moody, W. D. (1915). Wacker's manual of the plan of Chicago: Municipal economy. Chicago, IL: Henneberry Company.
41. Mumford, L. (1961). The city in America. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
42. National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (Kerner Commission). (1968). Report of the National Advisory Committee on Civil Disorders. New York, NY: Bantam.
43. Nelson, G. (1977). How to see: A guide to reading our manmade environment. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.
44. Neuman, M. (1998). Does planning need the plan? Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 208-220. (Pubitemid 28453773)
45. Newark Central Planning Board. (1964). Master plan 1964 city of Newark, NJ. Newark, NJ: Author.
46. Newark Central Planning Board. (2004). Land use element of the master plan for the City of Newark. Newark, NJ: City of Newark Department of Economic & Housing Development. Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http://www.ci.newark. nj.us/government/city-departments/economic-housing-development/ newarks-master-plan.php
47. Nolen, J. (1936). Comprehensive city plan for Dubuque, Iowa. Dubuque, IA: City Planning and Zoning Commission.
48. Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission. (2005). 2040 regional framework plan. Chicago, IL: Author.
49. Northeast Illinois Planning Commission. (2007) NIPC plans and policies: Legacy report. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/documents/20583/674d1b2f-7512-410a-ada7- c8dd61c6fbf5
50. Panofsky, E. (1939). Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
51. Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52. Reps, J. (1965). The making of urban America: A history of city planning in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Ryan, B. (2006). Incomplete and incremental plan implementation in Providence, Rhode Island, 1960-2000. Journal of Planning History, 5(1), 35-64.
54. Schaeffer, D. (Ed.). (1988). Two centuries of American planning. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55. Scott, M. (1969). American city planning since 1890: A history commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the American Institute of Planners. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56. Smith, C. (2006). The plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the remaking of the American city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Southworth, M. (2003). New urbanism and the American metropolis. Built Environment, 29(3), 210-226. (Pubitemid 37507230)
58. Talen, E. (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(3), 248-259.
59. Tuttle, B. R. (2009). How Newark became Newark: The rise, fall, and rebirth of an American city. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
60. U.S. Department of Commerce, Division of the Census. (2010). Newark (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/34/3451000.html
61. Waldner, L. S. (2004). Planning to perform: Evaluation models for city planners. Berkeley Planning Journal, 17, 1-28. (Pubitemid 39000695)
62. Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.