Contingent valuation and real estate damage estimation

Journal of Real Estate Literature

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 283-305

  Lipscomb, Clifford A ^a   Kummerow, Max ^b   Spiess, Will ^b   Kilpatrick, Sarah ^b   Kilpatrick, John A ^b  

^a Greenfield Advisors LLC   (United States)

^b Greenfield Advisors LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855875390     PISSN: 09277544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Agarwal, S. The Impact of Homeowners' Housing Wealth Estimation on Consumption and Saving Decisions. Real Estate Economics, 2007, 35, 135-54.
2. Ajzen, I., Brown, T.C., and L.H. Rosenthal. Information Bias in Contingent Valuation: Effects of Personal Relevance, Quality of Information, and Motivational Orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30, 43-57. (Pubitemid 126685565)
3. Akerlof, G.A. The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, 84, 488-500.
4. Alberini, A. Detecting Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy, 2005.
5. Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register, 1993, 58, 4601-14.
6. Bishop, R. and T. Heberlein. Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Direct Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61, 926-30.
7. Blomquist, G.C., K. Blumenschein, and M. Johannesson. Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 43, 473-502.
8. Bohara, A., M. McKee, R.P. Berrens, H. Jenkins-Smith, C.L. Silva, and D.S. Brookshire. Effects of Total Cost and Group-Size Information on Willingness to Pay Responses: Open Ended vs. Dichotomous Choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1998, 35, 142-63. (Pubitemid 28382161)
9. Bokhari, S. and D. Geltner. Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications. Real Estate Economics, forthcoming.
10. Brown, T.C., I. Ajzen, and D. Hrubes. Further Tests of Entreaties to Avoid Hypothetical Bias in Referendum Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 46, 353-61. (Pubitemid 37078312)
11. Brown, T., P. Champ, R. Bishop, and D. McCollum. Which Response Format Reveals the Truth About Donations to a Public Good? Land Economics, 1996, 72, 152-66.
12. Bryman, A. and E. Bell. Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.
13. Bulte, E., S. Gerking, J.A. List, and A. de Zeeuw. The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from a Field Study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005, 49, 330-42. (Pubitemid 40240962)
14. Cameron, T.A. A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data-Maximum-Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic-Regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1988, 15, 355-79.
15. Carson, R.T. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA (in press).
16. Carson, R.T., N.E. Flores, and N.F. Meade. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19, 173-210. (Pubitemid 32459257)
17. Carson, R.T. and W.M. Hanemann. Contingent Valuation. In K.-G. Mäler and J.R. Vincent (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics. Volume 2. Elsevier B.V., 2005.
18. Carson, R.T. and R.C. Mitchell. The Issue of Scope in Contingent Valuation Studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993, 75, 1263-67.
19. Champ, P.A., and R.C. Bishop. Donation Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19, 383-402. (Pubitemid 32824463)
20. Champ, P.A., R.C. Bishop, T.C. Brown, and D.W. McCollum. Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997, 33, 151-62. (Pubitemid 27266564)
21. Clauretie, T. and P. Thistle. The Effect of Time-on-Market and Location on Search Costs and Anchoring: The Case of Single-Family Properties. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2007, 35:2, 181-96.
22. Cummings, R., G. Harrison, and E. Ruström. Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? The American Economic Review, 1995, 85, 260-66.
23. Cummings, R.G. and L.O. Taylor. Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method. The American Economic Review, 1999, 89, 649-65.
24. Diamond, P.A. and J.A. Hausman. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8, 45-64.
25. Dickie, M., A. Fisher, and S. Gerking. Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1987, 82, 69-75.
26. Dillman, D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007.
27. Earnhart, D. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods to Value Environmental Amenities at Residential Locations. Land Economics, 2001, 77, 12-29. (Pubitemid 32300683)
28. -. Combining Revealed and Stated Data to Examine Housing Decisions Using Discrete Choice Analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 2002, 51, 143-69.
29. Einio, M., M. Kaustia, and V. Puttonen. Price Setting and the Reluctance to Realize Losses in Apartment Markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2008, 29, 19-34.
30. Farmer, M.C. and C.A. Lipscomb. Conservative Responses in the Active Policy Setting: DC rejections below WTP Dichotomous Choice. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2008, 39, 223-46. (Pubitemid 351199171)
31. Fischhoff, B. Debiasing. In: Judgment under Uncertainty. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
32. Genesove, D. and C. Mayer. Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116, 1233-60.
33. Hicks, J.R. Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939.
34. International Association for Assessing Officers. Standards on the Valuation of Properties Affected by Environmental Contamination.
35. Jackson, T.O. Surveys, Market Interviews, and Environmental Stigma. The Appraisal Journal, 2004, 72:4, 300-10.
36. Johansson, P-O. Evaluating Health Risks: An Economic Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
37. Kealy, M., J. Dovidio, and M. Rockel. Willingness to Pay to Prevent Additional Damage to the Adirondacks from Acid Rain. Regional Science Review, 1987, 15, 118-41.
38. Kinnard, W.N. Measuring the Effects of Contamination on Property Values: The Focus of the Symposium in the Context of Current Knowledge. In: Measuring the Effects of Hazardous Materials Contamination on Real Estate Values: Techniques and Applications. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 1992.
39. Krinsky, I. and A.L. Robb. On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1986, 68, 715-19.
40. Kummerow, M. Thinking Statistically About Valuations. The Appraisal Journal, 2000, 68, 318-26.
41. -. A Statistical Definition of Value. The Appraisal Journal, 2002, 70, 407-16.
42. Lipscomb, C.A. and B.C. Koford. Conservative Dichotomous Choice Responses in the Active Policy Setting: The Case of University Parking. Applied Economics Letters, 2011, 18:1, 39-42.
43. Loomis, J., T. Brown, B. Lucero, and G. Peterson. Improving Validity Experiments of Contingent Valuation Methods: Results of Efforts to Reduce the Disparity of Hypothetical and Actual WTP. Land Economics, 1996, 72, 450-61. (Pubitemid 126618197)
44. Loomis, J., A. Gonzalez-Caban, and R. Gregory. Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Land Economics, 1994, 70, 499-506.
45. Mathews, K.E. Under the Microscope: Dissection of a Contingent Valuation Survey. The Appraisal Journal, 2008, 76:3, 259-69.
46. Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.
47. -. Evaluating the Validity of Contingent Valuation Studies. In: G.L. Peterson, B.L. Driver, and R. Gregory (eds.), Amenity Resource Valuation: Integrating Economics with Other Disciplines. Boulder, CO: Venture Publishing Co., 1988.
48. Mundy, B. and D. McLean. Using the Contingent Value Approach for Natural Resource and Environmental Damage Applications. The Appraisal Journal, 1998, 66, 290-97.
49. Poe, G.L, J.E. Clark, D. Rondeau, and W.D. Schulze. Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests for Contingent Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23, 105-31. (Pubitemid 35169721)
50. Portney, P. The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8, 3-17.
51. Roddewig, R.J. and J.D. Frey. Testing the Reliability of Contingent Valuation in the Real Estate Marketplace. The Appraisal Journal, 2006, 74, 267-80.
52. Schkade, D.A. and J.W. Payne. How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, 26, 88-109.
53. Seiler, M.J., V.L. Seiler, S. Traub, and D.M. Harrison. Regret Aversion and False Reference Points in Residential Real Estate. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2008, 30, 461-74.
54. Seip, K. and J. Strand. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: A Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1992, 2, 91-106.
55. Sewell, M. History of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. 2008. Retrieved on 9/15/2010 at: http://www.e-m-h.org/emh-history.pdf.
56. Simons, R.A. and K. Winson-Geideman. Determining Market Perceptions on Contamination of Residential Property Buyers Using Contingent Valuation Surveys. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2005, 27, 193-220. (Pubitemid 40763330)
57. Sprott, D.E. and T.A. Shimp. Using Product Sampling to Augment the Perceived Quality of Store Brands. Journal of Retailing, 2004, 80, 305-15. (Pubitemid 40595036)
58. Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 2010-2011 edition. The Appraisal Standards Board, The Appraisal Foundation. Authorized by Congress as the Source of Appraisal Standards and Appraiser Qualifications.
59. Whynes, D.K., J.L. Wolstenholme, and E. Frew. Evidence of Range Bias in Contingent Valuation Payment Scales. Health Economics, 2004, 13, 183-90. (Pubitemid 38208179)
60. Wilson, A.R. Contingent Valuation: Not an Appropriate Valuation Tool. The Appraisal Journal, 2006, Winter, 53-61.
61. World Bank Institute. Environmental Economics and Development Policy Course. Washington, DC. 2002. Retrieved on 9/29/2010. Accessed at: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/36513/ TheoryMethodContingentValuation.pdf.