Teaching and learning self-assessment strategies in middle school

Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 141-164

  Afflerbach, Peter ^a   Meuwissen, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855842117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613301     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Afflerbach, P. (2002). Teaching reading self-assessment strategies. In C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research'based best prractices (pp. 96-111). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Afflerbach, P., & VanSledright, B. (2001). Hath! Doth! What? Middle graders reading innovative history text. Journal of Adolescent and Adidt Literacy, 44, 698-709.
3. Baker, E. (1994). Learning-based assessments of history understanding. Educational Psychologist, 29, 97-106.
4. Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77-95). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 139-148.
6. Block, C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehensioninstruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford Press.
7. Flavell, J. (1978). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Grigg, W., Daane, M., Jin, Y., & Campbell, J. (2003). The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
10. Heaton, R. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Leipzig, D., & Afflerbach, P. (2000). Determining the suitability of assessments: Using the CURRV framework. In L. Baker, M. Dreher, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers (pp. 159-187). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Markman, E. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 50, 643-655.
13. Moss, P., Beck, J., Ebbs, C., Matson, B., Muchmore, J., Steele, D., & Taylor, C. (1992). Portfolios, accountability, and an interpretive approach to validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 12-21.
14. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Silver Spring, MD: National Council for the Social Studies.
15. National Council of Teachers of English/International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16. Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational assessment ofstudents (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
17. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
18. Paris, S., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal reports of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive sciences and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Washington, DC: Rand.
22. Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
23. Tierney, R., Carter, M., & Desai, L. (1991). Portfolio assessmentin the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
24. VanSledright, B. A., & Afflerbach, P. (in press). Assessing the status of historical sources: An exploratory study of eight elementary students reading documents. In P. Lee (Ed.), Children and teachers' ideas about history: International research in history education (Vol. 4). London: Woburn Press.
25. VanSledright, B., Alexander, P, Maggioni, L., & Kelly, T. (2002). The Historical Knowledge Teaching Assessment Battery. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
26. Wineburg, S. (1997). Beyond "breadth and depth": Subject matter knowledge and assessment. Theory Into Practice, 36, 255-263.