Design theorizing individual information systems

PACIS 2011 - 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Baskerville, Richard ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design science; Individual computing; Personal systems

Indexed keywords

COMPUTING POWER; DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN SCIENCE; INDIVIDUAL COMPUTING; INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS; INFLUENCE MODEL;

DESIGN; RESEARCH;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84855838614     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Agarwal, R., Animesh, A., & Prasad, K. (2009). Research Note-Social Interactions and the "Digital Divide": Explaining Variations in Internet Use. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 277- 294.
2. Alter, S. (2008). Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 448-469.
3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
4. Baskerville, R. (2011). Individual information systems as a research arena (Editorial). European Journal Information Systems, 20(3), 251-254.
5. Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (2010). Explanatory Design Theory. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(5), 271-282.
6. Bassellier, G., Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2001). Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 159-182. (Pubitemid 32716737)
7. Bergman, O., Beyth-Marom, R., & Nachmias, R. (2008). The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems design: Evidence and implementations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 235-245.
8. Bostrom, R., & Heinen, S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective, part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(1), 17-32.
9. Burton, H. D. (1981). FAMULUS Revisited: Ten Years of Personal Information Systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(6), 440.
10. Burton, H. D. (1985). The Changing Environment of Personal Information Systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1), 48-52.
11. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Practice. Chichester: J. Wiley.
12. Ciborra, C. U., & Hanseth, O. (1999). Introduction: From Control to Drift. In C. U. Ciborra, K. Braa, A. Cordella, B. Dahlbom, A. Failla, O. Hanseth, V. Hepsoe, J. Ljungberg, E. Monteiro & K. A. Simon (Eds.), From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures.
13. Claisse, G., & Rowe, F. (1987). The telephone in question: Questions on communication. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 14(2-5), 207-219.
14. Crowston, K., Fitzgerald, B., Gloor, P., Schultze, U., & Yoo, Y. (2010). Panel: IS After Hours: How Should IS Researchers Study Non-Organizational Uses of ICT? Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems.
15. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
16. Dewan, S., Ganley, D., & Kraemer, K. (2010). Complementarities in the Diffusion of Personal Computers and the Internet: Implications for the Global Digital Divide. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 925-942.
17. Dodd, J. L., & Carr, H. H. (1994). Systems development led by end-users. Journal of Systems Management, 45(8), 34-40.
18. El Sawy, O. A. (1985). Personal Information Systems for Strategic Scanning in Turbulent Environments: Can the CEO Go On-Line? MIS Quarterly, 9(1), 53-60.
19. Fingar, P. (2009). Dot Cloud: The 21st Century Business Platform Built on Cloud Computing. Tampa, Fla.: MK Press.
20. Foschio, L. G. (1984). Motor Vehicle Records: Balancing Individual Privacy and the Public's Legitimate Need to Know. Communications and the Law, 6(1), 15-20.
21. Ghorab, K. E. (1997). The impact of technology acceptance consideration on system usage, and adopted level of technological sophistication: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 17(4), 249-259.
22. Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
23. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
24. Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312-335.
25. Hirschheim, R. (1985). Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective. Chichester: J.: Wiley.
26. Hooker, J. N. (2004). Is design theory possible? Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(2), 73-82.
27. Kasper, G. M. (1996). A theory of decision support system design for user calibration. Information Systems Research, 7(2), 215-232.
28. Kensing, F. (2003). Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. Copenhagne: ITU Press.
29. Kim, D. (2009). Adoption of Personal Information System: Innovation Diffusion Theory and Task- Technology Fit. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Information and Management Sciences. Proceedings, 13(2), 50-55.
30. Kraut, R. (1996). The Internet @ home. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 32-35.
31. Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and Communication: Alternative Uses of the Internet in Households. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 287-303.
32. Lehman, J. A. (1985). Personal Computing vs. Personal Computers. Information & Management, 9(5), 253-259.
33. Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2011). The Internet Big Picture. Retrieved 21 Feb, 2011, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
34. Moon, C. (1988). Computerized personal information systems for research scientists. International Journal of Information Management, 8(4), 265-273.
35. Mumford, E. (1983). Participative systems design: Practice and theory. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 4, 47-57.
36. Mumford, E., & Weir, M. (1979). Computer Systems Work Design: The ETHICS Method. London: Associated Business Press.
37. Nickerson, R. S. (1981). Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15(4), 469-483. (Pubitemid 12223597)
38. Norman, D. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
39. Ravasio, P., Schär, S. G., & Krueger, H. (2004). In pursuit of desktop evolution. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(2), 156-180.
40. Roof, B. M. (1982). A Personal Information System Checkup. Management Accounting, 63(7), 29-35.
41. Silberschatz, A., & Zdonik, S. (1996). Strategic directions in database systems-breaking out of the box. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4), 764.
42. Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
43. Taylor, N. J. (2006). The Impact of Public Grid Computing Portfolio Composition on Adoption Intentions. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(1), 23-32. (Pubitemid 44905734)
44. Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102.
45. Vidmar, N., & Flaherty, D. H. (1985). Concern for Personal Privacy in an Electronic Age. Journal of Communication (pre-1986), 35(2), 91-103.
46. Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36-59.
47. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory Construction As Disciplined Imagination. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531.
48. Yoo, S., & Yoon, S. (2010). Optimal Information System for Teams. Asia - Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics : APJAE, 17(2), 129-149.