Multiple end joining mechanisms repair a chromosomal DNA break in fission yeast

DNA Repair

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 120-130

  Li, Peng ^a   Li, Jun ^a   Li, Ming ^a   Dou, Kun ^a   Zhang, Mei Jun ^a   Suo, Fang ^a   Du, Li Lin ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Microhomology mediated end joining; Non homologous end joining; Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Indexed keywords

POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA TEMPLATE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FUNGAL STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; YEAST CELL;

BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOMES; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA LIGASES; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; MUTATION; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

EID: 84855831157     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Wilson T.E. Nonhomologous end-joining: mechanisms, conservation and relationship to illegitimate recombination. Molecular Genetics of Recombination 2007, 487-513. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. A. Aguilera, R. Rothstein (Eds.).
2. Lieber M.R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA Break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79:181-211.
3. Gu J., Lu H., Tippin B., Shimazaki N., Goodman M.F., Lieber M.R. XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate incompatible DNA ends and can ligate across gaps. EMBO J. 2007, 26:1010-1023.
4. Gu J., Lu H., Tsai A.G., Schwarz K., Lieber M.R. Single-stranded DNA ligation and XLF-stimulated incompatible DNA end ligation by the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex: influence of terminal DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:5755-5762.
5. Tsai C.J., Kim S.A., Chu G. Cernunnos/XLF promotes the ligation of mismatched and noncohesive DNA ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:7851-7856.
6. Nick McElhinny S.A., Havener J.M., Garcia-Diaz M., et al. A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:357-366.
7. Davis B.J., Havener J.M., Ramsden D.A. End-bridging is required for pol mu to efficiently promote repair of noncomplementary ends by nonhomologous end joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:3085-3094.
8. Nussenzweig A., Nussenzweig M.C. A backup DNA repair pathway moves to the forefront. Cell 2007, 131:223-225.
9. Haber J.E. Alternative endings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:405-406.
10. McVey M., Lee S.E. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:529-538.
11. Burton P., McBride D.J., Wilkes J.M., Barry J.D., McCulloch R. Ku heterodimer-independent end joining in Trypanosoma brucei cell extracts relies upon sequence microhomology. Eukar. Cell 2007, 6:1773-1781.
12. Glover L., Jun J., Horn D. Microhomology-mediated deletion and gene conversion in African trypanosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:1372-1380.
13. Kramer K.M., Brock J.A., Bloom K., Moore J.K., Haber J.E. Two different types of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are repaired by similar RAD52-independent, nonhomologous recombination events. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14:1293-1301.
14. Moore J.K., Haber J.E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16:2164-2173.
15. Lee S.E., Pâques F., Sylvan J., Haber J.E. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:767-770.
16. Wilson T.E., Lieber M.R. Efficient processing of DNA ends during yeast nonhomologous end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:23599-23609.
17. Tseng S.-F., Gabriel A., Teng S.-C. Proofreading activity of DNA polymerase Pol2 mediates 3'-end processing during nonhomologous end joining in yeast. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000060.
18. Baumann P., Cech T.R. Protection of telomeres by the Ku protein in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:3265-3275.
19. Manolis K.G., Nimmo E.R., Hartsuiker E., Carr A.M., Jeggo P.A., Allshire R.C. Novel functional requirements for non-homologous DNA end joining in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 2001, 20:210-221.
20. Hentges P., Ahnesorg P., Pitcher R.S., et al. Evolutionary and functional conservation of the DNA non-homologous end-joining protein, XLF/Cernunnos. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:37517-37526.
21. Cavero S., Chahwan C., Russell P. Xlf1 is required for DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 2007, 175:963-967.
22. Boulton S.J., Jackson S.P. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 1998, 17:1819-1828.
23. González-Barrera S., Sánchez A., Ruiz J.F., et al. Characterization of SpPol4, a unique X-family DNA polymerase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:4762-4774.
24. Forsburg S.L., Rhind N. Basic methods for fission yeast. Yeast 2006, 23:173-183.
25. Du L.-L., Nakamura T.M., Moser B.A., Russell P. Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:6150-6158.
26. Nickoloff J.A., Chen E.Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83:7831-7835.
27. Sato M., Dhut S., Toda T. New drug-resistant cassettes for gene disruption and epitope tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 2005, 22:583-591.
28. Du L.-L., Nakamura T.M., Russell P. Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:1583-1596.
29. Gusfield D. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology 1997, Cambridge University Press.
30. Needleman S.B., Wunsch C.D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1970, 48:443-453.
31. Markham N.R., Zuker M. UNAFold: software for nucleic acid folding and hybridization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008, 453:3-31.
32. Decottignies A. Capture of extranuclear DNA at fission yeast double-strand breaks. Genetics 2005, 171:1535-1548.
33. Decottignies A. Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by Pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics 2007, 176:1403-1415.
34. Nickoloff J.A., Singer J.D., Heffron F. In vivo analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO nuclease recognition site by site-directed mutagenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10:1174-1179.
35. Shim E.Y., Ma J.-L., Oum J.-H., Yanez Y., Lee S.E. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:3934-3944.
36. Pardo B., Ma E., Marcand S. Mismatch tolerance by DNA polymerase Pol4 in the course of nonhomologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2006, 172:2689-2694.
37. Shendure J., Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1135-1145.
38. Daley J.M., Laan R.L.V., Suresh A., Wilson T.E. DNA joint dependence of Pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:29030-29037.
39. Wilson S., Warr N., Taylor D.L., Watts F.Z. The role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad32, the Mre11 homologue, and other DNA damage response proteins in non-homologous end joining and telomere length maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27:2655-2661.
40. Boulton S.J., Jackson S.P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 1996, 15:5093-5103.
41. Hope J.C., Mense S.M., Jalakas M., Mitsumoto J., Freyer G.A. Rqh1 blocks recombination between sister chromatids during double strand break repair, independent of its helicase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:5875-5880.
42. Karathanasis E., Wilson T.E. Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae end-joining efficiency by cell growth stage but not by impairment of recombination. Genetics 2002, 161:1015-1027.
43. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004, 431:1011-1017.