Orion: A system for modeling, transformation and visualization of multidimensional heterogeneous networks

VAST 2011 - IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2011, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 51-60

  Heer, Jeffrey ^a   Perer, Adam ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IBM RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

data management; data transformation; end user programming; graphs; social network analysis; visualization

Indexed keywords

CENTRALITY MEASURES; COMPLEX ACTIVITY; DATA TRANSFORMATION; DISTRIBUTED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; DRAG-AND-DROP; END USER PROGRAMMING; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS; GRAPHS; INTERACTIVE MODELING; LARGE GRAPHS; NETWORK DATA; NETWORK MODELS; RELATIONAL OPERATOR; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; USER INTERACTION; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE; WORKFLOW LANGUAGE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; FLOW VISUALIZATION; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; METADATA; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOFTWARE DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84855794181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VAST.2011.6102441     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. E. Adar. GUESS: a language and interface for graph exploration. In ACM CHI, pages 791-800, 2006.
2. C. Aggarwal and H. Wang, editors. Managing and Mining Graph Data. Springer, 2010.
3. V. Batagelj and A. Mrvar. Pajek - program for large analysis. Connections, page 47, 1998.
4. M. Bostock and J. Heer. Protovis: A graphical toolkit for visualization. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 15(6):1121-1128, 2009.
5. M. Freire, C. Plaisant, B. Shneiderman, and J. Golbeck. ManyNets: an interface for multiple network analysis and visualization. In ACM CHI, pages 213-222, 2010.
6. G. W. Furnas. Generalized fisheye views. In ACM CHI, pages 16-23, 1986.
7. Gephi. http://gephi.org/.
8. M. Ghoniem, J.-D. Fekete, and P. Castagliola. On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: a controlled experiment and statistical analysis. Information Visualization, 4:114-135, July 2005.
9. H. He and A. K. Singh. Graphs-at-a-time: Query language and access methods for graph databases. In ACM SIGMOD, pages 405-417, 2008.
10. J. Heer and M. Agrawala. Software design patterns for information visualization. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 12(5):853-860, 2006. (Pubitemid 44955613)
11. J. Heer and M. Bostock. Declarative language design for interactive visualization. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 16(6):1149-1156, 2010.
12. B. Heller, E. Marschner, E. Rosenfeld, and J. Heer. Visualizing collaboration and influence in the open-source software community. In Mining Software Repositories, pages 223-226, 2011.
13. N. Henry and J.-D. Fekete. Visually exploring large social networks. In INTERACT, pages 604-610, 2007.
14. N. Henry, J.-D. Fekete, and M. J. McGuffin. NodeTrix: a hybrid visualization of social networks. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 13:1302-1309, November 2007. (Pubitemid 350076603)
15. I. Herman, G. Melançon, and M. S. Marshall. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Trans Vis &Comp Graphics, 6:24-43, January 2000. (Pubitemid 30594718)
16. D. Huynh and S. Mazzocchi. Google Refine. http://code.google.com/p/ google-refine/.
17. igraph. http://igraph.sourceforge.net/.
18. Jung. http://jung.sourceforge.net/.
19. S. Kandel, A. Paepcke, J. Hellerstein, and J. Heer. Wrangler: Interactive visual specification of data transformation scripts. In ACM CHI, pages 3363-3372, 2011.
20. H. Kang, L. Getoor, B. Shneiderman, M. Bilgic, and L. Licamele. Interactive entity resolution in relational data: A visual analytic tool and its evaluation. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 14(5):999-1014, 2008.
21. H. Kang, C. Plaisant, B. Lee, and B. B. Bederson. NetLens: iterative exploration of content-actor network data. Information Visualization, 6(1):18-31, March 2007. (Pubitemid 46598305)
22. B. Lee, M. Czerwinski, G. Robertson, and B. B. Bederson. Understanding research trends in conferences using PaperLens. In ACM CHI Extended Abstracts, pages 1969-1972, 2005.
23. J. Leskovec. SNAP. http://snap.stanford.edu/.
24. Network Workbench. http://nwb.slis.indiana.edu/.
25. M. E. J. Newman. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E, 69(6), 2004.
26. A. Perer and B. Shneiderman. Systematic yet flexible discovery: guiding domain experts through exploratory data analysis. In Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), pages 109-118, 2008.
27. B. Shneiderman and A. Aris. Network visualization by semantic substrates. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 12:733-740, 2006. (Pubitemid 44955598)
28. M. A. Smith, B. Shneiderman, N. Milic-Frayling, E. Mendes Rodrigues, V. Barash, C. Dunne, T. Capone, A. Perer, and E. Gleave. Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL. In Communities and Technologies (C&T), pages 255-264, 2009.
29. C. Stolte, D. Tang, and P. Hanrahan. Polaris: A system for query, analysis, and visualization of multidimensional relational databases. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 8(1):52-65, January 2002. (Pubitemid 34573482)
30. UCINET. http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/.
31. F. van Ham and A. Perer. "Search, Show Context, Expand on Demand": Supporting large graph exploration with degree-of-interest. IEEE Trans Vis & Comp Graphics, 15:953-960, November 2009.
32. F. van Ham, H.-J. Schulz, and J. M. Dimicco. Honeycomb: Visual analysis of large scale social networks. In INTERACT, pages 429-442, 2009.
33. M. Wattenberg. Visual exploration of multivariate graphs. In ACM CHI, pages 811-819, 2006.
34. L.Wilkinson. The Grammar of Graphics. Springer-Verlag, Secaucus, NJ, 2005.