Healthcare professionals' adoption and use of a clinical information system (CIS) in primary care: Insights from the Da Vinci study

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 73-87

  Vedel, Isabelle ^a,b   Lapointe, Liette ^b   Lussier, Marie Thérèse ^c,d   Richard, Claude ^c   Goudreau, Johanne ^c,d   Lalonde, Lyne ^c,d   Turcotte, Alain ^c,d  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Centre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic disease; Communication; Computers; Diffusion of innovation; Health information technology; Information systems; Patient; Physician; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC DISEASE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PRIMARY HEALTHCARE;

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTERS; DIFFUSION BARRIERS; DYNAMICS; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICINE;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ARTICLE; CANADA; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NURSE; PHARMACIST; PHYSICIAN; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESIDENT; SUPPORT GROUP;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; QUEBEC;

EID: 84855782594     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Parchman M.L., Pugh J.A., Romero R.L., Bowers K.W. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann. Fam. Med. 2007, 5(May-June (3)):196-201.
2. Van den Akker M., Buntinx F., Roos S., Knotterus J. Co morbidity or multimorbidity: what's in a name? A review of the literature. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 1996, 2:65-70.
3. Ostbye T., Yarnall K.S., Krause K.M., Pollak K.I., Gradison M., Michener J.L. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care?. Ann. Fam. Med. 2005, 3(May-June (3)):209-214.
4. Fortin M., Bravo G., Hudon C., Vanasse A., Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann. Fam. Med. 2005, 3(May-June (3)):223-228.
5. Christensen K., Doblhammer G., Rau R., Vaupel J.W. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 2009, 374(3 October (9696)):1196-1208.
6. Wagner E.H., Austin B.T., Davis C., Hindmarsh M., Schaefer J., Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2001, 20(November-December (6)):64-78.
7. Bodenheimer T., Wagner E.H., Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002, 288(16 October (15)):1909-1914.
8. Sands L.P., Wang Y., McCabe G.P., Jennings K., Eng C., Covinsky K.E. Rates of acute care admissions for frail older people living with met versus unmet activity of daily living needs. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2006, 54(February (2)):339-344.
9. Wenger N.S., Solomon D.H., Roth C.P., MacLean C.H., Saliba D., Kamberg C.J., et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003, 139(4 November (9)):740-747.
10. Dorr D.A., Wilcox A., Burns L., Brunker C.P., Narus S.P., Clayton P.D. Implementing a multidisease chronic care model in primary care using people and technology. Dis. Manage. 2006, 9(February (1)):1-15.
11. Starfield B. Threads and yarns: weaving the tapestry of comorbidity. Ann. Fam. Med. 2006, 4(March-April (2)):101-103.
12. Martin J.C., Avant R.F., Bowman M.A., Bucholtz J.R., Dickinson J.R., Evans K.L., et al. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann. Fam. Med. 2004, 2(March-April (Suppl. (1))):S3-S32.
13. Avison D., Young T. Time to rethink health care and ICT?. Commun. ACM 2007, 50(6):69-74.
14. Strayer S.M., Pelletier S.L., Martindale J.R., Rais S., Powell J., Schorling J.B. A PDA-based counseling tool for improving medical student smoking cessation counseling. Fam. Med. 2010, 42(May (5)):350-357.
15. Crosson J.C., Stroebel C., Scott J.G., Stello B., Crabtree B.F. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Ann. Fam. Med. 2005, 3(July-August (4)):307-311.
16. Miller R.H., Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2004, 23(March-April (2)):116-126.
17. College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. National Physician Survey, 2007.
18. Lussier M.T., Turcotte A., Richard C., Lapointe L., Vedel I., Goudreau J., et al. An evaluation of a patient-centred information technology tool for the management of chronic diseases by primary care interdisciplinary teams. ElectronicHealthcare 2010, 8(4).
19. Walker J.M., Carayon P. From tasks to processes: the case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2009, 28(March-April (2)):467-477.
20. Prochaska J.O., Di Clemente C.C. The Transtheoretical Approach, Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy 1984, Dorsey Professional Book, Homewood Illinois.
21. MacPhail L.H., Neuwirth E.B., Bellows J. Coordination of diabetes care in four delivery models using an electronic health record. Med. Care 2009, 47(September (9)):993-999.
22. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, Free Press, New York. 5th ed.
23. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 1990, Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA. 2nd ed.
24. Miles H., Huberman A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1994, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Burton-Jones A., Straub D.W. Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Inf. Syst. Res. 2006, 17(3):228-246.
26. Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods 2002, Sage Publication, Newbury Park (CA). 3rd ed.
27. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research 1967, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
28. Strauss A.C., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques 1990, Sage Publications, Inc. 2nd ed.
29. Pandit M.R. The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method. Qual. Rep. 1996, 2(December (4)).
30. QSR International. NVivo 8 software.
31. Dawes M., Chan D. Knowing we practise good medicine: implementing the electronic medical record in family practice. Can. Fam. Physician 2010, 56(January (1)):15-16. pp. 15-16, e1-3.
32. Walkinshaw E. Challenges of family practice: shopping for electronics. CMAJ 2011, 183(6 September (12)):1353-1354.
33. Walkinshaw E. Challenges of family practice: using electronic records. CMAJ 2011, 183(6 September (12)):1354-1355.
34. Terry A.L., Thorpe C.F., Giles G., Brown J.B., Harris S.B., Reid G.J., et al. Implementing electronic health records: key factors in primary care. Can. Fam. Physician 2008, 54(May (5)):730-736.
35. Ebell M.H., Frame P. What can technology do to, and for, family medicine?. Fam. Med. 2001, 33(April (4)):311-319.
36. Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit, Implementing electronic health records in primary health care: DELPHI (Deliver Primary Healthcare Information) management and operations team perspectives. Report to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, London, On: Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit, 2006.
37. Gilles G., Brown J., Terry A.L., Thind A., Stewart M. Implementation and adoption of EHRs in family practice: the providers' perspective. Poster Presented at: 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group, October 2007.
38. Kim S., Malhotra N. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: an integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Manage. Sci. 2005, 51(1 May (5)):741-755.
39. Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001, 25(September (3)):351-370.
40. Hier D.B., Rothschild A., LeMaistre A., Keeler J. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005, 74(August (7-8)):657-662.
41. Ludwick D.A., Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(January (1)):22-31.
42. Hayrinen K., Saranto K., Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(May (5)):291-304.
43. Terry A.L., Giles G., Brown J.B., Thind A., Stewart M. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective. Fam. Med. 2009, 41(July-August (7)):508-512.
44. Ovretveit J., Scott T., Rundall T.G., Shortell S.M., Brommels M. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19(October (5)):259-266.
45. Hiatt J., Creasey T.J. Change Management: The People Side of Change 2003, Prosci Research, Loveland, Colo. 1st ed.
46. Caluwé Ld, Vermaak H. Learning to Change: A Guide for Organization Change Agents 2003, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
47. Soparnot R. Le management du changement 2010, Vuibert, Paris.
48. Denomme L.B., Terry A.L., Brown J.B., Thind A., Stewart M. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption. Fam. Med. 2011, 43(October (9)):638-642.
49. Walsh S.H. The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ 2004, 328(15 May (7449)):1184-1187.
50. Ventres W.B., Frankel R.M. Patient-centered care and electronic health records: it's still about the relationship. Fam. Med. 2010, 42(May (5)):364-366.
51. Bensing J.M., Tromp F., van Dulmen S., van den Brink-Muinen A., Verheul W., Schellevis F.G. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped general practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Fam. Pract. 2006, 7:62.
52. Morris MGaV V. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers. Psychol. 2000, 53:375-403.