Leaf epidermal features of Lithocarpus (Fagaceae) from China and their systematic significance

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 216-228

  Zhou, Wei ^a,b   Xia, Nian He ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Evolutionary trends; Leaf epidermis; Trichomes

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; NEW RECORD; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY; TRICHOME;

CHINA;

CASTANOPSIS; CYCLOBALANOPSIS; FAGACEAE; LITHOCARPUS; QUERCUS;

EID: 84855777143     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01196.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barnett EC. 1944. Keys to the species groups of Quercus, Lithocarpus, and Castanopsis of eastern Asia, with notes on their distribution. Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 34: 159-204.
2. Camus A. 1948. Monographie des genres Quercus et Lithocarpus. Paris: Paul Lechevalier Press, Pl. XXIV-XCVII.
3. Camus A. 19521954. Les chênes. Monographie du genre Lithocarpus. Paris: Paul Lechevalier Press, 511-1196.
4. Cannon CH, Manos PS. 2000. The Bornean Lithocarpus Bl. section Synaedrys (Lindl.) Barnett (Fagaceae): its circumscription and description of a new species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 343-357.
5. Cannon CH, Manos PS. 2003. Phylogeography of the southeast Asian stone oaks (Lithocarpus). Journal of Biogeography 30: 211-226.
6. Chen L, Li JQ, Wang HC, Li XW, Peng YS. 2009. Lithocarpus longzhouicus comb. nov. (Fagaceae) from China: based on morphological and molecular data. Nordic Journal of Botany 27: 90-96.
7. Chen ZD, Zhang ZY. 1991. A study on foliar epidermis in Betulaceae. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 29: 156-163.
8. Christophel DC, Kerrigan R, Rowett AI. 1996. The use of cuticular features in the taxonomy of the Lauraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83: 419-432.
9. Cutler DF. 1964. Anatomy of vegetative organs of Trigonobalanus Forman (Fagaceae). Kew Bulletin 17: 401-409.
10. Hardin JW. 1976. Terminology and classification of Quercus trichomes. The Journal of the Mitchell Society 92: 151-161.
11. Hardin JW. 1979. Patterns of variation in foliar trichomes of eastern North American Quercus. American Journal of Botany 66: 576-585.
12. Huang CC, Chang YT. 1998. Lithocarpus. In: Chen HY, Huang CC, eds. Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae, Vol. 22. Beijing: Science Press, 80-211.
13. Huang CC, Chang YT, Bruce B. 1999. Lithocarpus. In: Wu ZY, Peter HR, eds. Flora of China, Vol. 4. Beijing: Science Press, 333-369.
14. Jones JH. 1986. Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 228-275.
15. Li JQ. 1996. The origin and distribution of the family Fagaceae. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 34: 376-396.
16. Liang HP, Jen HW, Liu YQ. 1990. A study on the morphology of foliar trichomes of evergreen oaks (Quercus) in China and its implication in taxonomy. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 28: 112-121.
17. Liu MQ, Zhou ZK. 2009. Taxonomic and ecological implications of leaf cuticular morphology in Castanopsis, Castanea, and Chrysolepis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 283: 111-123.
18. Llamas F, Perez-Morales C, Acedo C, Penas A. 1995. Foliar trichomes of the evergreen and semideciduous species of the genera Quercus (Fagaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 47-57.
19. Luo Y, Zhou ZK. 2001. Leaf epidermis of Quercus subgen. Cyclobalanopsis (Oerst.) Schneid. (Fagaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 39: 489-501.
20. Manos PS, Zhou ZK, Cannon CH. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. International Journal of Plant Science 162: 1361-1379.
21. Nishida S, van der Werff H. 2007. Are cuticular characters useful in solving generic relationships of problematic species of Lauraceae. Taxon 56: 1229-1237.
22. Oh SH, Manos PS. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences. Taxon 57: 434-451.
23. Olsson U. 1976. The structure of stellate trichomes and their taxonomic implication in some Quercus (Fagaceae). Botaniska Notiser 128: 412-424.
24. Pu CX, Zhou ZK, Luo Y. 2002. A cladistic analysis of Quercus (Fagaceae) in China based on leaf epidermis and architecture. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 24: 689-698.
25. Stace CA. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany 4: 1-78.
26. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), 4.0 edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
27. Uzunova K, Palamarev E, Ehrendorfer F. 1997. Anatomical changes and evolutionary trends in the foliar epidermis of extant and fossil Euro-Mediterranean oaks (Fagaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 141-159.
28. Vázquez ML. 2006. Trichome morphology in selected Mexican red oak species (Quercus section Lobatae). Sida 22: 1091-1110.
29. Vázquez ML, Valencia AS, Nixon KC. 2004. Notes on red oaks (Quercus sect. Lobatae) in eastern Mexico, with description of a new species, Quercus hirtifolia. Brittonia 56: 136-142.
30. Zhou ZK, Willkinson H, Wu ZY. 1995. Taxonomical and evolutionary implications of the leaf anatomy and architecture of Quercus L. subgen. Quercus from China. Cathaya 7: 1-34.