Effect of visual-spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-9

  Lufler, Rebecca S ^a   Zumwalt, Ann C ^b   Romney, Carla A ^c   Hoagland, Todd M ^d  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy course performance; Gross anatomy education; Medical education; Medical students; Mental rotation test; Visual spatial ability

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK; ROTATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMY; BOSTON; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84855769848     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.264     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anastakis DJ, Hamstra SJ, Matsumoto ED. 2000. Visual-spatial abilities in surgical training. Am J Surg 179: 469-471.
2. Baenninger MA, Newcombe N. 1989. The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 20: 327-344.
3. Boom-Saad Z, Langenecker SA, Bieliauskas LA, Graver CJ, O'Neill JR, Caveney AF, Greenfield LJ, Minter RM. 2008. Surgeons outperform normative controls on neuropsychologic tests, but age-related decay of skills persists. Am J Surg 195: 205-209.
4. Bouchard TJJr, McGee MG. 1977. Sex differences in human spatial ability: Not an X-linked recessive gene effect. Soc Biol 24: 332-335.
5. DeFries JC, Ashton GC, Johnson RC, Kuse AR, McClearn GE, Mi MP, Rashad MN, Vandenberg SC, Wilson JR. 1976. Parent-offspring resemblance for specific cognitive abilities in two ethnic groups. Nature 261: 131-133.
6. Donnon T, Paolucci EO, Violato C. 2007. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med 82: 100-106.
7. Fernandez R, Dror IE, Smith C. 2011. Spatial abilities of expert clinical anatomists: Comparison of abilities between novices, intermediates, and experts in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 4: 1-8.
8. Fleming ND. 2011. VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles. Christchurch, New Zealand: Neil D. Fleming. URL: [accessed 9 June 2011].
9. Fleming ND, Mills C. 1992. Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. Improv Acad 11: 137-155.
10. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. 2001. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 357: 363-364.
11. Guillot A, Champely S, Batier C, Thiriet P, Collet C. 2007. Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12: 491-507.
12. Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen VA, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. 2009. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 2157-2172.
13. Hegarty M, Keehner M, Khooshabeh P, Montello DR. 2009. How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learn Indiv Differ 19: 61-70.
14. Hegarty M, Kozhevnikov M. 1999. Types of visual-spatial representation and mathematical problem solving. J Educ Psychol 91: 684-689.
15. Honey P, Mumford A. 2006. The Learning Styles Questionnaire 40-Item Version. 1st Ed. Maidenhead, UK: Peter Honey Publications Ltd. 54 p.
16. Hoyek N, Collet C, Rastello O, Fargier P, Thiriet P, Guillot A. 2009. Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning. Teach Learn Med 21: 201-206.
17. Klein B, McCall L, Austin D, Piterman L. 2007. A psychometric evaluation of the learning styles questionnaire: 40-item version. Br J Educ Tech 38: 23-32.
18. Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J. 2005. Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cognit 33: 710-726.
19. Langlois J, Wells GA, Lecourtois M, Bergeron G, Yetisir E, Martin M. 2009. Spatial abilities in an elective course of applied anatomy after a problem-based learning curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 2: 107-112.
20. Linn MC, Petersen AC. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Dev 56: 1479-1498.
21. Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM. 2010. Incorporating radiology into medical gross anatomy: Does the use of cadaver CT scans improve students' academic performance in anatomy?. Anat Sci Educ 3: 56-63.
22. McGee MG. 1979. Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychol Bull 86: 889-918.
23. Newcombe N, Bandura MM, Taylor DC. 1983. Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles 9: 377-386.
24. Peplow PV. 1998. Attitudes and examination performance of female and male medical students in an active, case-based learning programme in anatomy. Med Teach 20: 349-355.
25. Peters M. 2005. Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems. Brain Cognit 57: 176-184.
26. Peters M, Battista C. 2008. Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library. Brain Cognit 66: 260-264.
27. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C. 1995. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cognit 28: 39-58.
28. Peters M, Manning JT, Reimers S. 2007. The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Arch Sex Behav 36: 251-260.
29. Peters M, Reimers S, Manning JT. 2006. Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255, 100 subjects: The BBC internet study. Brain Cognit 62: 177-189.
30. Provo J, Lamar C, Newby T. 2002. Using a cross-section to train veterinary students to visualize anatomical structures in three dimensions. J Res Sci Teach 39: 10-34.
31. Rochford K. 1985. Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Med Educ 19: 13-26.
32. Stericker A, LeVesconte S. 1982. Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill. J Pers Soc Pyschol 43: 1018-1029.
33. Terlecki MS, Newcombe NS, Little M. 2008. Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Appl Cognit Psychol 22: 996-1013.
34. Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR. 1978. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 47: 599-604.
35. Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117: 250-270.
36. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ, Matsumoto ED, Cusimano MD. 2002. Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet 359: 230-231.
37. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Caminiti MF, Anastakis DJ, Grober ED, Reznick RK. 2003. Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery 134: 750-757.
38. Zhao X, Oppler S, Dunleavy D, Kroopnick M. 2010. Validity of four approaches of using repeaters' MCAT scores in medical school admissions to predict USMLE Step 1 total scores. Acad Med 85: S64-S67.