Treatment effects of R-appliance and Anterior Inclined Bite Plate in Class II, Division I malocclusion

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 634-638

  Rahman, Showkatbakhsh ^a   Meybodi, Shahin Emami ^b   Jamilian, Abdolreza ^b   Meybod, Seyyed AmirReza Fatahi ^c   Meybodi, Elham Morshedi ^d  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d DDS   (Iran)

Author keywords

Angle Class II malocclusion; Functional orthodontic appliances; Growth; Removable orthodontic appliances

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855757454     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600015     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aelbers CM, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: part I, fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:513-519.
2. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:250-258.
3. nd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 343-356.
4. Clark WJ. Twin block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopaedics. London: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995. p. 45-46.
5. Clark WJ. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:1-18.
6. Ehmer U, Tulloch CJ, Proffit WR, Phillips C An internationa comparison of early treatment of Class II/1 cases: skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60:392-408.
7. Emami MS, Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh A. The effect of anterior inclined plane treatment on the dentoskeletal of Class II division 1 patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007;25:130-132.
8. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;113:51-61.
9. Graber TM, Neumann B. Removable orthodontic appliances. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1984. p. 198-356.
10. Hägglund P, Segerdal S, Forsberg CM. The integrated Herbst appliance-treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:120-127.
11. Jacobs T, Sawaengkit P. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research efficacy trials of bionator Class II treatment: a review. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:571-575.
12. Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Kamali Z. R-appliance: a different design in functional therapy in Class II Division I malocclusion. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2009;20:11-14.
13. Janson M, Janson G, Sant'Ana E, Simão TM, Freitas MR. An orthodontic-surgical approach to Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:266-273.
14. Kerr WJS, TenHave TR, McNamara JA Jr. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Eur J Orthod. 1989:235-242.
15. Lohakare SS. Orthodontic removable appliances. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2008. p. 46.
16. McDonagh S, Moss JP, Goodwin P, Lee RT A prospective optical surface scanning and cephalometric and assessment of the effect of functional appliances on the soft tissues. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:115-126.
17. McSherry PF, Bradley H. Class II correction - reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod. 2000;27:219-225.
18. Mills JR. The effect of functional appliances on the skeleta pattern. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:267-275
19. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst ortwin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128-137.
20. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
21. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Treatment effects of mandibular anterior repositioning appliances on patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:286-295.
22. Perillo L, Johnston LE Jr, Ferro A. Permanence of skeleta changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacia Orthop. 1996;109:132-139.
23. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J, Shaye R. Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a functiona appliance? Int J Orthod. 1991;29:3-8.
24. Sari Z, Goyenc Y, Doruk C, Usumez S. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs. activator-headgear combination. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:286-393
25. Shen G, Hägg U, Darendeliler M. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functiona appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005;8:2-10.
26. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:597-609.
27. Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:54-59.
28. Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacia Orthop. 1997;111:533-542.
29. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:242-251.
30. Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:9-17.