Commentary: Using potential outcomes to understand causal mediation analysis

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 861-873

  Imai, Kosuke ^a   Jo, Booil ^b   Stuart, Elizabeth A ^c  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855757202     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.606743     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albert, J. M. (2008). Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1282-1304.
2. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444-455.
3. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal?: A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991-1013.
5. Bollen, K. (1987). Total, direct and indirect effects in structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 37-69). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
6. Frangakis, C. E., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics, 58, 21-29.
7. Hill, J., Waldfogel, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Sustained effects of high participation in an early intervention for low-birth-weight premature infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 730-744.
8. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
9. Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 449-484). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
10. Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15, 309-334.
11. Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the black box of casualty: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105, forthcoming.
12. Imai, K., Keele, L., & Yamamoto, T. (2010). Identification, inference, and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science, 25, 51-71.
13. Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2009). Experimental designs for identifying causal mech-anisms. Technical report, Department of Politics, Princeton University. Retrieved from http://imai.princeton.edu/research/Design.html
14. Imai, K., & van Dyk, D. A. (2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 854-866.
15. Imai, K., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects under alter-native exogeneity assumptions. Technical report, Department of Politics, Princeton University. Retrieved from http://imai.princeton.edu/research/medsens.html
16. Jin, H., & Rubin, D. B. (2008). Principal stratification for causal inference with extended partial compliance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 101-111.
17. Jo, B. (2008). Causal inference in randomized experimentswith mediational processes. Psychological Methods, 13, 314-336.
18. Jo, B., & Stuart, E. A. (2009). On the use of propensity scores in principal causal effect estimation. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 2857-2875.
19. Jo, B., Stuart, E. A., MacKinnon, D. P., & Vinokur, A. D. (2011). The use of propensity scores in mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 425-452.
20. Jo, B., Wang, C.-P., & Ialongo, N. S. (2009). Using latent outcome trajectory classes in causal inference. Statistics and Its Interface, 2, 403-412.
21. Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2003). Design and analysis of cross-over trials (2nd ed.). London, England: Chapman & Hall.
22. Judd, C., & Kenny, D. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
23. Kraemer, H., Kiernan, M., Essex, M., & Kupfer, D. (2008). How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology, 27, 101-108.
24. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 816-841.
26. Mealli, F., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). Comment on Adams et al. and assumptions allowing the estimation of direct causal effects. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 79-87.
27. Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 411-420). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
29. Pearl, J. (in press). The causal mediation formula-a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms. Prevention Science.
30. Petersen, M. L., Sinisi, S. E., & van der Laan, M. J. (2006). Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology, 17, 276-284.
31. Robins, J. M. (2003). Semantics of causal DAG models and the identification of direct and indirect effects. In P. J. Green, N. L. Hjort, and S. Richardson (Eds.), Highly structured stochastic systems (pp. 70-81). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
32. Robins, J. M., & Greenland, S. (1992). Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology, 3, 143-155.
33. Robins, J. M., & Greenland, S. (1994). Adjusting for differential rates of pcp prophylaxis in highversus low-dose AZT treatment arms in an AIDS randomized trial. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 737-749.
34. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010). Design of observational studies. New York, NY: Springer.
35. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
36. Rubin, D. B. (2004). Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31, 161-170.
37. Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322-331.
38. Shrout, P., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
39. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
40. Sobel, M. E. (1988). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In J. S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions (pp. 46-64). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Sobel, M. E. (2008). Identification of causal parameters in randomized studies with mediating variables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 230-251.
42. Spencer, S., Zanna, M., & Fong, G. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
43. Stuart, E. A. (2010).Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1-21.
44. Stuart, E. A., & Ialongo, N. S. (2010). Matching methods for selection of subjects for follow-up. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 746-765.
45. Stuart, E. A., Warkentien, S., & Jo, B. (2011). Using propensity scores to account for varying levels of program participation in randomized controlled trials. Manuscript in preparation.
46. Ten Have, T., Elliott, M., Joffe, M., Zanutto, E., & Datto, C. (2004). Causal models for randomized physician encouragement trials in treating primary care depression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 16-25.
47. VanderWeele, T. J. (2008). Simple relations between principal stratification and direct and indirect effects. Statistics and Probability Letters, 78, 2957-2962.
48. Wang, C.-P., Jo, B., & Brown, C. H. (2011). Causal inference in longitudinal comparative ef- fectiveness studies with repeated measures of a continuous intermediate variable. Manuscript submitted for publication.