Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications of Management Theory

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-10

  Dutta, Saurav ^a   Lawson, Raef ^b   Marcinko, David ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Institute of Management Accounts Inc   (United States)

^c SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency theory; Corporate social responsibility; Public policy; Stewardship; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855751282     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.259     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrams F. 1951. Management responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review May: 29-34.
2. Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K. 2002. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employee attractiveness. Business and Society 41: 292-318.
3. Baiman S. 1982. Agency research in managerial accounting: A survey. Journal of Accounting Literature 1: 154-213.
4. Barnett ML, Salomon RM. 2003. Throwing a curve at socially responsible investing research. Organization and Environment 16(3): 381-389.
5. Byrd J, Parrino R, Pritsch G. 1998. Stockholder-manager conflicts and firm value. Financial Analysts Journal May/June: 14-30.
6. Callan S, Thomas J. 2009. Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 61-78.
7. Cashore B. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15(4): 503-529.
8. Cragg W. 2002. Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 113-142.
9. Davis J, Schoorman F, Donaldson L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 20-47.
10. Donaldson L. 1990. The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review 15: 369-381.
11. Donaldson L, Davis J. 1991. Stewardship or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. American Journal of Management 16(1): 49-64.
12. Dutta S, Lawson R, Marcinko D. 2010a. Enhancing future business leaders' environmental awareness. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 9(1/2/3).
13. Dutta S, Lawson R, Marcinko D. 2010b. A system of cost variances to evaluate sustainability efforts. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance 21(3): 47-52.
14. Eisenhardt K. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57-74.
15. Epstein M. 2008. Making Sustainability Work. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc: San Francisco.
16. Foster D, Jonker J. 2005. Stakeholder relationships: the dialogue of engagement. Corporate Governance 5(5): 51-57.
17. Friedman M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine September 13, 1970.
18. Greening DW, Turban DB. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society 39: 254-280.
19. Harrington C. 2003. Socially responsible investing: Balancing financial needs with a concern for others. Journal of Accountancy 195(1): 52-56.
20. Hart SL. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20: 986-1015.
21. Jamali D. 2008. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics 82: 213-231.
22. Jensen M, Meckling W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
23. Jonker J, Foster D. 2002. Stakeholder excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9: 187-195.
24. Kusku F. 2007. From necessity to responsibility: Evidence for corporate environmental citizenship activities from a developing country perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14: 74-87.
25. Labbat S, White R. 2002. Environmental Finance. John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ.
26. Levy DL. 1997. Environmental management as political sustainability. Organization and Environment 10(2): 126-147.
27. Mackenzie C, Lewis A. 1999. Morals and markets: The case of ethical investing. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3): 439-452.
28. Maslow A. 1970. Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row: New York.
29. Moberg D. 1997. Virtuous peers in work organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 67-85.
30. Orlitzky M, Benjamin JD. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society 40(4): 369-396.
31. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Reyes SL. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta analysis. Organizational Studies 24(3): 403-441.
32. Prakash A. 2000. Greening the Firm: the Politics of Corporate Environmentalism, Cambridge University Press: West Nyack, NY.
33. Purser RE, Park C, Montuori A. 1995. Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review 20: 1053-1089.
34. Sen S, Bhattacharya CB. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 225-244.
35. Siegel D. 2009. Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives 23(3): 5-16.
36. Simmons J. 2004. Managing in the post-managerialist era: towards socially responsible corporate governance. Management Decision 32(3/4): 601-611.
37. Stauber JC, Rampton S. 1995. Toxic sludge is good for you. Common Courage: Monroe, ME.
38. Sundaramurthy C, Lewis M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review 28(3): 397-415.
39. Turban DB, Greening DW. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40: 658-672.
40. Waddock SA. 2002. Leading Corporate Citizens: Visions, Values, Value Added. McGraw-Hill: Boston.
41. Walley, N. and Whitehead, B. 1994. It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review May/June: 46-52.
42. Watts R, Zimmerman J. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
43. White A, Becker M, Savage D. 1993. Environmentally smart accounting: Using total cost assessment to advance pollution prevention. Pollution Prevention Review Summer: 247-259.
44. Williamson, OE. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press: New York.