Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction after body contouring: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 807-813

  Reavey, Patrick L ^a   Klassen, Anne F ^b   Cano, Stefan J ^c   McCarthy, Colleen ^g   Scott, Amie ^g   Peter Rubin, J ^e   Shermak, Michele ^f   Pusic, Andrea L ^d  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g NONE

Author keywords

Abdominoplasty; Body contouring; Brachioplasty; Breast reduction; Dermatolipectomy; Liposuction; Massive weight loss; Obesity; Thighplasty

Indexed keywords

BODY IMAGE; BREAST REDUCTION; BREAST REDUCTION ASSESSED SEVERITY SCALE QUESTIONNAIRE; BREAST RELATED SYMPTOMS QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DERRIFORD APPEARANCE SCALE; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FREIBURG QUESTIONNAIRE ON AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY AND COSMETIC SURGERY; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; LIPOSUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); ARTICLE; BARIATRIC SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BARIATRIC SURGERY; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84855739714     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: 1527330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1090820X11417426     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. National databank statistics, 2010. http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/Stats2010-1.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2011.
2. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Metabolic and bariatric surgery fact sheet. http://www.asmbs.org/Newsite07/media/asbs- presskit.htm. Published 2008. Accessed October 21, 2010.
3. Heddens CJ. Body contouring after massive weight loss. Plast Surg Nurs 2004;24:107-115.
4. Pecori L, Serra Cervetti GG, Marinari GM, Migliori F, Adami GF. Attitudes of morbidly obese patients to weight loss and body image following bariatric surgery and body contouring. Obes Surg 2007;17:68-73.
5. Song AY, Rubin JP, Thomas V, Dudas JR, Marra KG, Fernstrom MH. Body image and quality of life in post massive weight loss body contouring patients. Obesity 2006;14:1626-1636. (Pubitemid 46214830)
6. Sarwer DB, Fabricatore AN. Psychiatric considerations of the massive weight loss patient. Clin Plast Surg 2008;35:1-10. (Pubitemid 350179950)
7. Sarwer DB, Thompson JK, Mitchell JE, Rubin JP. Psychological considerations of the bariatric surgery patient undergoing body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:423e-434e.
8. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2000/2008/2009 national plastic surgery statistics: cosmetic and reconstructive procedure trends. http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Media/Statistics.html. Published 2009. October 21, 2010.
9. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
10. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002;11:193-204.
11. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures. Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/. Published 2009. Accessed October 20, 2010.
12. Augustin M, Zschocke I, Sommer B, Sattler G. Sociodemographic profile and satisfaction with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent anesthesia. Dermatol Surg 1999;25:480-483. (Pubitemid 29279590)
13. Sommer B, Zschocke I, Bergfeld D, Sattler G, Augustin M. Satisfaction of patients after treatment with botulinum toxin for dynamic facial lines. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:456-460. (Pubitemid 36583141)
14. Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:216-222. (Pubitemid 32288603)
15. Carr T, Harris D, James C. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59): a new scale to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol 2000;5:201-215. (Pubitemid 30248882)
16. Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS 24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol 2005;10:285-298. (Pubitemid 40677065)
17. Klassen A, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Goodacre T. Contrasting evidence of the effectiveness of cosmetic surgery from two health related quality of life measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:440-441. (Pubitemid 29306622)
18. Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Goodacre T. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic surgery patients with a condition-specific instrument: the Derriford Scale. Br J Plast Surg 1998;51:380-384. (Pubitemid 28391134)
19. Klassen A, Newton J, Goodacre T. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59) [comment]. Br J Plast Surg 2001;10:647-648. (Pubitemid 32982645)
20. Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1591-1599. (Pubitemid 33032622)
21. Sigurdson L, Mykhalovskiy E, Kirkland S, Pallen A. Symptoms and related severity experienced by women with breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:481-486. (Pubitemid 46142930)
22. Sigurdson L, Kirkland SA, Mykhalovskiy E. Validation of a questionnaire for measuring morbidity in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1108-1114. (Pubitemid 47493933)
23. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:345-353.
24. Cano S, Pusic AL, Klassen A, et al. BREAST-Q: a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery [abstract 1742]. 2009 International Society for Quality of Life meeting abstracts. QLR J 2009; A-37.
25. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-W5esley; 1968.
26. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
27. Wright B, Stone M. Best Test Design: Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1979.
28. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal: measurements, however must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:857-890.
29. Magdaleno RJ, Chaim EA, Turato ER. Understanding the life experiences of Brazilian women after bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. Obes Surg 2010;20:1086-1089.