Text simplification and comprehensible input: A case for an intuitive approach

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 89-108

  Crossley, Scott A ^a   Allen, David ^b   McNamara, Danielle S ^c  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computational linguistics; corpus linguistics; intuitive simplification; text comprehensibility; text simplification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855733171     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168811423456     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen D.A study of the role of relative clauses in the simplification of news texts for learners of English.System. 2009;37:585-99.
2. Allen J.,Widdowson H.G.The communicative approach to language teaching. Brumfit C.Johnson K., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979:124-42.
3. The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2). Baayen R.H.Piepenbrock R.van Rijn H., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium; 1995:.
4. Biber D.Representativeness in corpus design.Journal of Literary and Linguistic Computing. 1993;8:243-57.
5. Brace N.,Kemp R.,Snelgar R.SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. 2006). SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. 3rd edition. London: Palgrave.London: Palgrave; 2006:.
6. Carrell P.L.Readability in ESL.Reading in a Foreign Language. 1987;4:21-40.
7. Chafe W.L.Subject and topic. Li C.N., ed. New York: Academic; 1975:26-55.
8. Coltheart M.The MRC Psycholinguistic Database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1981;33A:497-505.
9. Cohen J.A power primer.Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155-59.
10. Crossley S.A.,McNamara D.S.Assessing L2 reading texts at the intermediate level: An approximate replication of Crossley, Louwerse, McCarthy & McNamara (2007).Language Teaching. 2008;41:409-29.
11. Crossley S.A.,McNamara D.S.Computationally assessing lexical differences in second language writing.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2009;17:119-35.
12. Crossley S.A.,Greenfield J.,McNamara D.S.Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices.TESOL Quarterly. 2008;42:475-93.
13. Crossley S.A.,Louwerse M.M.,McCarthy P.M.,McNamara D.S.A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts.The Modern Language Journal. 2007;91:15-30.
14. Davies A.,Widdowson H.Techniques in applied linguistics. Allen J.P.Corder S.P., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1974:155-201.
15. Davison A.,Kantor R.On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations.Reading Research Quarterly. 1982;17:187-209.
16. Dufty D.F.,Graesser A.C.,Lightman E.,Crossley S.A.,McNamara D.S.An algorithm for detecting spatial cohesion in text. Presentation at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse; 2006Minneapolis, MN, USA; 2006.
17. Fellbaum C.WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:.
18. Field A.Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage; 2005:.
19. Gaies S.J.The investigation of language classroom processes.TESOL Quarterly. 1983;17:205-17.
20. Goodman K.,Freeman D.Simplification: Theory and application. Tickoo M.L., ed. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center; 1993:69-76.
21. Graesser A.,McNamara D.,Louwerse M.,Cai Z.Coh-Metrix Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 2004;36:193-202.
22. Greenfield J.Readability formulas for EFL.JALT Journal. 2004;26:5-24.
23. Haberlandt K.F.,Graesser A.C.Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions.Journal of Experiment Psychology: General. 1985;114:357-74.
24. Hatch E.Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House; 1978:.
25. Hill D.Survey review: Graded readers.ELT Journal. 1997;51:57-81.
26. Hill D.Graded readers in English.ELT Journal. 2008;62:184-204.
27. Kintsch W.,Keenan J.Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences.Cognitive Psychology. 1973;5:257-74.
28. Klein W.Time in language. London: Routledge; 1994:.
29. Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Landauer T.McNamara D.S.Dennis S.Kintsch W., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2007:.
30. Little D.,Devitt S.,Singleton D.Learning foreign languages from authentic texts: Theory and practice. Dublin: Authentik; 1989:.
31. Long M.,Ross S.Simplification: Theory and application. Tickoo M.L., ed. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center; 1993:29-52.
32. Lotherington-Woloszyn H.Simplification: Theory and application. Tickoo M.L., ed. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center; 1993:140-54.
33. Magliano J.P.,Schleich M.C.Verb aspect and situation models.Discourse Processes. 2000;29:83-112.
34. Malvern D.D.,Richards B.J.,Chipere N.,Durán P.Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:.
35. McCarthy P.M.An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD).Dissertation Abstracts International. 2005;66:.
36. McCarthy P.M.,Jarvis S.vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation.Language Testing. 2007;24:459-88.
37. Nunan D.Second language teaching and learning. London: Heinle & Heinle; 1999:.
38. Onestopenglish (2007). News lessons [online]. Macmillan English Campus, London. Retrieved from: http://www.onestopenglish.com (November2011).
39. Pearson P.D.The effects of grammatical complexity on children's comprehension, recall, and conception of certain semantic relationships.Reading Research Quarterly. 1974-75;10:155-92.
40. Perfetti C.A.,Landi N.,Oakhill J.The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Snowling M.J.Hulme C., ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005:227-47.
41. Rashotte C.A.,Torgesen J.K.Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children.Reading Research Quarterly. 1985;20:180-88.
42. Rayner K.,Pollatsek A.The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994:.
43. Rosch E.,Mervis C.B.,Gray W.D.,Johnson D.M.,Boyes-Braem P.Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology. 1976;8:382-439.
44. Salsbury T.,Crossley S.A,McNamara D.S.Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse.Second Language Research. 2011;27:343-60.
45. Simensen A.M.Adapted readers: How are they adapted?.Reading in a Foreign Language. 1987;4:41-57.
46. Tweissi A.I.The effects of the amount and the type of simplification on foreign language reading comprehension.Reading in a Foreign Language. 1998;11:191-206.
47. Yano Y.,Long M.,Ross S.Effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension.Language Learning. 1994;44:189-219.
48. Young D.J.Linguistic simplification of second language reading material: Effective instructional practice?.The Modern Language Journal. 1999;83:350-66.
49. Zwaan R.A.,Magliano J.P.,Graesser A.C.Dimensions of situation-model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995;21:386-97.