Examining collaborative dialogue among couples a window into prospective memory processes

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Volumn 219, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 100-107

  Margrett, Jennifer A ^a   Reese Melancon, Celinda ^b   Rendell, Peter G ^c  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aging; Collaborative cognition; Memory processes; Prospective memory; Reminders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855711475     PISSN: 21908370     EISSN: 21512604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000054     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bäckman, L., & Dixon, R. A. (1992). Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 259-283. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.259
2. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization and compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (1996). Interactive minds in a life-span perspective: Prologue. In P. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Aron, A. (2010). When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition, 38, 255-264. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.255
5. Brandimonte, M. A., & Ferrante, D. (2008). The social side of prospective memory. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 347-365). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
6. Carstensen, L. L., Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140-149. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.140
7. Cheng, S., & Strough, J. (2004). A comparison of collaborative and individual everyday problem solving in younger and older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 58, 167-195. doi: 10.2190/0Q2P-VMNH-4FXW-6J6A
8. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409-422). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
9. Dixon, R. A., & Bäckman, L. (1995). Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gains. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Dixon, R. A., & Gould, O. N. (1996). Adults telling and retelling stories collaboratively. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspective on the social foundation of cognition. New York, NY: University Press.
11. Dixon, R. A., & Gould, O. N. (1998). Younger and older adults collaborating on retelling everyday stories. AppliedDevelopmental Science, 2, 160-171. doi: 10.1207/s1532480xads0203_4
12. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 16, 717-726. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717
13. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1082-1088. doi: 10.1037/a0019184
14. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327-342. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
15. Gould, O. N., Kurzman, D., & Dixon, R. A. (1994). Communication during prose recall conversations by young and old dyads. Discourse Processes, 17, 149-165. doi: 10.1080/ 01638539409544863
16. Guynn, M. J. (2008). Theory of monitoring in prospective memory: Instantiating a retrieval mode and periodic target checking. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, G. O. Einstein, M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 53-76). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
17. Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Phillips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27-39. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27
18. Johansson, O., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2000). Do elderly couples have a better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121-133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/ 04)14:2<121::AID-ACP626>3.0.CO;2-A
19. Kimbler, K. J., & Margrett, J. A. (2009). Older adults' interactive behaviors during collaboration on everyday problems: Linking process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 531-542. doi: 10.1177/0165025409 343754
20. Kliegel, M., Mackinlay, R., & Jäger, T. (2008). A life-span approach to the development of complex prospective memory. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 187-216). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
21. Kobayashi, K., & Maruno, S. (1992). An analysis of contents in metamemory knowledge and processes as factors affecting prospective memory. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 377-385.
22. Kobayashi, K., & Maruno, S. (1994). The role of other persons in prospective memory: Dependence on other persons inhibits remembering and execution of a task. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 64, 482-487.
23. Margrett, J. A., & Marsiske, M. (2002). Gender differences in older adults' everyday cognitive collaboration. International Journal of Behavior Development [Special Section: Collaborative cognition in later adulthood], 26, 45-59. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000319
24. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2007). Comparing older and younger adults in an event-based prospective memory paradigm containing an output monitoring component. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 168-188. doi: 10.1080/138255891007074
25. Miller, P. (1993). Theories of developmental psychology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
26. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. A. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27. Thöne-Otto, A. T., & Walther, K. (2008). Assessment and treatment of prospective memory disorders in clinical practice. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, G. O. Einstein, M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 321-345). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
28. Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (1990). Metamemories of memory researchers. Memory & Cognition, 18, 321-327.
29. Reese, C. M., & Cherry, K. E. (2004). Practical memory concerns in adulthood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59, 235-253.
30. Reese, C. M., Cherry, K. E., & Norris, L. E. (1999). Practical memory concerns of older adults. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 5, 231-244.
31. Rendell, P. G., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Virtual week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology (Special Issue), 14, S43- S62. doi: 10.1002/acp.770
32. Rendell, P. G., & Henry, J. D. (2009). A review of virtual week for prospective memory assessment: Clinical implications. Brain Impairment, 10, 14-22. doi: 10.1375/brim.10.1.14
33. Schaefer, E. G., & Laing, M. L. (2000). 'Please remind me ...' The role of others in prospective remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S99-S114. doi: 10.1002/acp.773
34. Skladzien, E. M. (2010). Age differences in output-monitoring accuracy. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 240-256. doi: 10.1080/13825580903265673
35. Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1089-1095. doi: 10.1037/a0019183
36. Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734-746. doi: 10.1037/ 0278-7393.33.4.734
37. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010, May). Facts for features: Older Americans month: May 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau
38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Abridged from 1934; A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.