A method for antibiotic susceptibility testing: Applicable and accurate

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 341-345

  Ataee, Ramezan Ali ^a,b   Mehrabi Tavana, Ali ^a,b   Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Javad ^a   Moridi, Khadijeh ^a,b   Zadegan, Mahdi Ghorbananli ^a,b  

^a BAQIYATALLAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b University of Medical Sciences   (Iran)

Author keywords

Antibiotic; Dilution; Optical density

Indexed keywords

2 PROPANOL; ACETONITRILE; ALCOHOL; BUTANOL; CHLOROFORM; ISOBUTANOL; PENICILLIN G; PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; WATER;

ACCURACY; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BROTH DILUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MICROTITER PLATE ASSAY; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL DENSITY; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SOLVENT EFFECT; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84855691456     PISSN: 20083645     EISSN: 20084161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5812/kowsar.20083645.2374     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Backes BA, Cavalieri SJ, Rudrik JT, Britt EM. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19(6):744-7.
2. Chiang YL, Lin CH, Yen MY, Su YD, Chen SJ, Chen HF. Innovative antimicrobial susceptibility testing method using surface plasmon resonance. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24(7):1905-10.
3. Murray PR, Niles AC, Heeren RL. Comparison of a highly automated 5-h susceptibility testing system, the Cobas-Bact, with two reference methods: Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and broth microdilution. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25(12):2372-7.
4. Bauer AW. Current status of antibiotic susceptibility testing with single high potency discs. Am J Med Technol. 1966;32(2):97-102.
5. Barry AL, Garcia F, Thrupp LD. An improved single-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly-growing pathogens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970;53(2):149-58.
6. Hubert SK, Nguyen PD, Walker RD. Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1998;10(2):164-8.
7. Wayne PA. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically: approved standard M7-A7. 7th ed. Clinical and laboratory standards institute; 2006.
8. Woods GL, Bergmann JS, Witebsky FG, Fahle GA, Boulet B, Plaunt M, et al. Multisite reproducibility of E test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, and Mycobacterium fortuitum. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(2):656-61.
9. Jones RN, Biedenbach DJ, Marshall SA, Pfaller MA, Doern GV. Evaluation of the Vitek system to accurately test the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates against cefepime. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;32(2):107-10.
10. Liao CH, Kung HC, Hsu GJ, Lu PL, Liu YC, Chen CM, et al. In-vitro activity of tigecycline against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in Taiwan determined by the broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32 Suppl 3:S192-6.
11. Baker CN, Stocker SA, Rhoden DL, Thornsberry C. Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the auto SCAN-4 automated reader. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23(1):143-8.
12. Valdivieso-Garcia A, Imgrund R, Deckert A, Varughese BM, Harris K, Bunimov N, et al. Cost analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing comparing the E test and the agar dilution method in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65(2):168-74.
13. Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of contracting out on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(4):CD008133.
14. Lee SS, Chen YS, Tsai HC, Wann SR, Lin HH, Huang CK, et al. Predictors of septic metastatic infection and mortality among patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(5):642-50.
15. Torres E, Villanueva R, Bou G. Comparison of different methods of determining beta-lactam susceptibility in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(Pt 5):625-9.
16. Martinez-Lamas L, Trevino M, Romero-Jung PA, Regueiro BJ. [Comparison between Phoenix system and agar-based methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus spp]. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2008;21(3):184-8.
17. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Bailey & Scott's diagnostic microbiology. United State of America: Mosby; 2007:194-198.
18. Mittman SA, Huard RC, Della-Latta P, Whittier S. Comparison of BD phoenix to vitek 2, microscan MICroSTREP, and Etest for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(11):3557-61.
19. Clavier B, Perrier-Gros-Claude JD, Foissaud V, Dumas M, Aubert G, Barbe G, et al. [Comparison of the results of the E test and the method for determining minimum inhibitory concentrations in solid media for penicillin G, amoxicillin, and cefotaxime for S. pneumoniae. A multicenter study]. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1998;46(6):369-74.
20. Hansen SL, Freedy PK. Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;17(5):878-86.
21. Jones RN, Thornsberry C, Barry AL, Gavan TL. Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13(1):184-94.
22. Schwalbe R, Steele-Moore L, Goodwin AC. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocols. New York: CRC Press; 2007.
23. Wayne PA. Clinical and Laboratory standards institute. Document M100-S16.