Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 164-168

  Hubert, Susannah K ^a   Nguyen, Phouc Dinh ^a   Walker, Robert D ^a  

^a Michigan State University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; HUMANS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0032039895     PISSN: 10406387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104063879801000208     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Berke I, Tierno PM Jr: 1996, Comparison of efficacy and cost-effectiveness of BIOMIC VIDEO and Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility test systems for use in the clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 34:1980-1984.
2. Craig WA: 1993, Qualitative susceptibility tests versus quantitative MIC tests. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 16:231-236.
3. D'Amato RF, Hochstein L, Vernaleo JR, et al.: 1985, Evaluation of the BIOGRAM antimicrobial susceptibility test system. J Clin Microbiol 22:793-798.
4. Gerber AU, Craig WA: 1981, Worldwide clinical experience with cefoperazone. Drugs 22(Suppl.):108-118.
5. Matthews KR, Oliver SP, King SH: 1990, Comparison of Vitek gram-positive identification system with API Staph-Trac system for species identification of staphylococci of bovine origin. J Clin Microbiol 28:1649-1651.
6. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS): 1993, Methods for dilution of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed., approved standard M7-A4. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
7. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS): 1997, Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, tentative standard M31-T. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
8. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS): 1997, Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 6th ed., approved standard M2-A6. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
9. Salmon SA, Watts JL, Walker RD, et al.: 1995, Evaluation of a commercial system for the identification of gram-negative nonfermenting bacteria of veterinary importance. J Vet Diagn Invest 7:161-164.
10. Sautter RL, Denys GA: 1987, Comparison of BIOGRAM and commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test systems. J Clin Microbiol 25:301-304.