Cooperation in the polish national parks and their neighborhood in a view of different stakeholders -a long way ahead?

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 295-312

  Olko, J ^a   Hedrzak, M ^b   Cent, J ^a   Subel, A ^c  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

^c Ojców National Park   (Poland)

Author keywords

Local community; Management of protected areas; National park; Stakeholders cooperation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NATIONAL PARK; NATURE CONSERVATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; PROTECTED AREA; STAKEHOLDER;

POLAND;

EID: 84855678603     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2011.592074     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Burger, T., 2002. Samorzad lokalny - park narodowy. Konflikt i szansa na wspoldzialanie. In: H. Pralat, ed. Samorzady i ich stowarzyszenia w ochronie parkow narodowych. Mosina: NFOSiGW, Stowarzyszenie Samorzadow Polskich Wspoldzialajacych z Parkami Narodowymi.
2. Campion, P. and Shrum, W., 2002. Environmental attitudes of researchers in developing countries. Journal of African and Asian studies, 37 (1), 17-42.
3. Cent, J., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., and Nowak, N., 2010. Ocena efektów [Public consultation programme Natura 2000 sites in Małopolska - effects' Evaluation]. Chrońmy Przyrode{ogon} Ojczysta{ogon}, 66 (4), 251-260.
4. Dz.U.2004.92.880., 2004. Ustawa z dnia 16 kwietnia 2004 r. o ochronie przyrody. Act on Nature Protection, Poland.
5. Dz.U.2008.199.1227., 2008. Ustawa z dnia 3 października 2008 r. o udoste{ogon}pnianiu informacji o środowisku i jego ochronie, udziale społeczeństwa w ochronie środowiska oraz o ocenach oddzialywania na środowisko. Act on Access to Information on Environment and its Protection, Public Participation in Environmental Conservation and Environmental Impact Assessment., Poland.
6. Dz.U.2008.201.1237., 2008. Ustawa z dnia 3 października 2008 r. o zmianie ustawy o ochronie przyrody oraz niektórych innych ustaw. Act on a Change of Act of Nature Protection and Some Other Acts, Poland.
7. Greenwood, D.J., Whyte, W.F., and Harkavy, I., 1993. Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Human relations, 46, 175-192.
8. Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., 2008. Rethinking nature conservation policy in Poland: the need for a human dimensions approach. Human dimensions of wildlife, 13, 380-381.
9. Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. and Cent, J., 2010. Udział społeczeństwa szansa{ogon} dla realizacji programu Natura 2000 w Polsce. Chrońmy Przyrode{ogon} Ojczysta{ogon}, 66 (5), 341-352.
10. Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. and Cent, J., 2011. Expansion of nature conservation areas - problems with Natura 2000 implementation in Poland? Environmental management, 47, 11-27.
11. Grujicic, I., Milijic, V., and Nonid, D., 2008. Conflict management in protected areas: the Lazar Canyon natural monument, Eastern Serbia. International journal of biodiversity science and management, 4 (4), 220-230.
12. GUS: Central Statistical Bureau, 2005. Ochrona Środowiska [Environmental Conservation in Poland]. Warszawa: Glówny Urza{ogon}d Statystyczny. Available from: www.stat.gov.pl [Accessed 10 September 2010].
13. Hibszer, A., and Partyka, J., 2005. Mie{ogon}dzy ochrona{ogon} przyrody a gospodarka{ogon} - blizej ochrony. Konflikty człowiek - przyroda na obszarach prawnie chronionych w Polsce. Sosnowiec - Ojców: Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne, Oddział Katowicki, Ojcowski Park Narodowy.
14. Howard, M.M., 2003. The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Howari, F., 2006. Environmental service learning programs in the United Arab Emirates: impact on environmental awareness and civic engagement. Washington, DC: Center for Social Development, Global Service Institute; George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University.
16. Kaiser, F.G., Oerke, B., and Bogner, F.X., 2007. Behavior-based environmental attitude: development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of environmental psychology, 27, 242-251.
17. Krolikowska, K., 2007. Konflikty spoleczne w polskich parkach narodowych. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
18. Lawrence, A., 2008. Experiences with participatory conservation in post-socialist Europe. International journal of biodiversity science and management, 4 (4), 179-186.
19. Maddenm, F., 2004. Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human-wildlife conflict. Human dimensions of wildlife, 9, 247-257.
20. Manfredo, M.J. and Dayer, A., 2004. Concepts of exploring the social aspects of human-wildlife conflict in a global context. Human dimensions of wildlife, 9, 317-328.
21. Olko, J. and Hedrzak, M., 2010. Komunikacja nieformalna jako element procesu zaangazowania spolecznosci lokalnej w dzialania na rzecz ochrony przyrody. Studia i Materialy Centrum Edukacji Przyrodniczo-Lesnej, 12 (1), 24.
22. Pietrzyk, A., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., and Cent, J., 2009. Potrzeby edukacyjne społeczności lokalnych w wybranych gminach polskich Krapat w zwia{ogon}zku z wdrazaniem programu Natura 2000. [Educational needs concerning Natura 2000 program among local residents of the Polish Carpathians' municipalities]. Chrońmy Przyrode{ogon} Ojczysta{ogon}, 65 (6), 407-414.
23. Polish Ministry of the Environment, 2009. Fourth national report on the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity - Poland. Available from: http://biodiv.mos.gov.pl/biodiv/files/IV-CBD-report---POLAND.pdf [Accessed 20 September 2010].
24. Polish Ministry of the Environment, 2010. Parki Narodowe w Polsce. Dzialałność Organizacyjna i Finanse w 2009. Available from: http://www.mos.gov.pl/g2/big/2011-01/b52618a356a47d83dc66b0a34aefb9a0.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2011].
25. Ramirez, R. and Quarry, W., 2004. Communication for development: a medium for innovation in natural resource management. IDRC and FAO.
26. Reed, M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological conservation, 141, 2417-2431.
27. Richards, C., Blackstock, K.L., and Carter, C.E., 2004. Practical approaches to participation. SERG Policy Brief no. 1. Aberdeen: Macaulay Land Use Research Institute.
28. Rodela, R. and Udovč, A., 2008. Participation in nature protection: does it benefit the local community? A Triglav National Park case study. International journal of biodiversity science and management, 4 (4), 210-219.
29. Solon, J. and Sikorski, P., 2007. The rules of landscape protection on private grounds within national parks (a case study of the areas of Bryzgiel and Krusznik in the Wigry National Park). Parki narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody, 26 (2), 123-134.
30. Švajda, J., 2008. Participatory conservation in a post communist context: the Tatra National Park and Biosphere Reserve, Slovakia. International journal of biodiversity science and management, 4 (4), 201-209.
31. Szabo, E.A., et al., 2008. Participatory protected area management - a case study from Rodna Mountains National Park, Romania. International journal of biodiversity science and management, 4 (4), 188-200.
32. Szafranski, J., 2003. Historia utworzenia Magurskiego Parku Narodowego. In: A. Górecki et al., eds. Przyroda Magurskiego Parku Narodowego. Kraków: Krempna.
33. Sztompka, P. 2000. Civilizational competence: a prerequisite of post-communist transition. http://www.ces.uj.edu.p1/download/Szt-f-1.doc.
34. Tews, K., 2009. From law-taking to policy-making. The environmental dimension of the EU accession process - challenges, risks and chances for the SEE countries. Environmental policy and governance, 19, 130-139.
35. The State Council for Nature Protection, 2007. Stanowisko w sprawie kryzysu ochrony przyrody w Polsce. [A stand on a Polish nature conservation crisis.] Communication. Available from: http://forum.bocian.org.pl/pafiledb/uploads/PROP-kryzys-ochrony-przyrody.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2011].
36. Tworzecki, H., 2008. A disaffected new democracy? Identities, institutions and civic engagement in post-communist Poland. Communist and post-communist studies, 41, 47-62.
37. Watson, K. and Halse, C.M., 2005. Environmental attitudes of pre-service teachers: a conceptual and methodological dilemma in cross-cultural data collection. Asia Pacific education review, 1 (6), 59-71.
38. Welp, M. and Stoll-Kleemann, S., 2006. Integrative theory of reflexive dialogues. In: S. Stoll-Kleemann and M. Welp, eds. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management. Heidelberg: Springer.